Microscopic analysis of sharp force trauma in bone and cartilage: A validation study

Christian Crowder, Christopher W. Rainwater, Jeannette S. Fridie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sharp force trauma research lacks agreement on reported error rates for correctly identifying toolmark characteristics on bone and cartilage. This study provides error rates for determining blade class (serrated, partially serrated, nonserrated) and type of edge bevel (left, right, even). Three analysts examined cuts to a wax medium, cartilage, and bone using two types of microscopes. Additionally, the observers examined impressions taken from the wax medium and the cartilage. Overall, a total of 504 observations were performed. Serrated blades were distinguishable from nonserrated blades due to their patterned striations. Some difficulties were encountered in distinguishing serrated and partially serrated blades; however, when these groups were considered together as one classification type (serrated), classification accuracy improved from 79% to 96%. Classification accuracy for edge bevel was 65%. Error rates were similar when comparing direct observation of the cut marks versus indirect observation (impressions). Additionally, the type of microscope used did not affect error rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1119-1126
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Forensic Sciences
Volume58
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Validation Studies
Cartilage
Waxes
Bone and Bones
Wounds and Injuries
Observation
Research

Keywords

  • Forensic anthropology
  • Forensic science
  • Knife wound
  • Sharp force trauma
  • Stab wound
  • Striations
  • Toolmarks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Genetics

Cite this

Microscopic analysis of sharp force trauma in bone and cartilage : A validation study. / Crowder, Christian; Rainwater, Christopher W.; Fridie, Jeannette S.

In: Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 58, No. 5, 01.09.2013, p. 1119-1126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Crowder, Christian ; Rainwater, Christopher W. ; Fridie, Jeannette S. / Microscopic analysis of sharp force trauma in bone and cartilage : A validation study. In: Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2013 ; Vol. 58, No. 5. pp. 1119-1126.
@article{6d98e7cb8165440d9b4dc47026e6a823,
title = "Microscopic analysis of sharp force trauma in bone and cartilage: A validation study",
abstract = "Sharp force trauma research lacks agreement on reported error rates for correctly identifying toolmark characteristics on bone and cartilage. This study provides error rates for determining blade class (serrated, partially serrated, nonserrated) and type of edge bevel (left, right, even). Three analysts examined cuts to a wax medium, cartilage, and bone using two types of microscopes. Additionally, the observers examined impressions taken from the wax medium and the cartilage. Overall, a total of 504 observations were performed. Serrated blades were distinguishable from nonserrated blades due to their patterned striations. Some difficulties were encountered in distinguishing serrated and partially serrated blades; however, when these groups were considered together as one classification type (serrated), classification accuracy improved from 79{\%} to 96{\%}. Classification accuracy for edge bevel was 65{\%}. Error rates were similar when comparing direct observation of the cut marks versus indirect observation (impressions). Additionally, the type of microscope used did not affect error rates.",
keywords = "Forensic anthropology, Forensic science, Knife wound, Sharp force trauma, Stab wound, Striations, Toolmarks",
author = "Christian Crowder and Rainwater, {Christopher W.} and Fridie, {Jeannette S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1556-4029.12180",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "1119--1126",
journal = "Journal of Forensic Sciences",
issn = "0022-1198",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microscopic analysis of sharp force trauma in bone and cartilage

T2 - A validation study

AU - Crowder, Christian

AU - Rainwater, Christopher W.

AU - Fridie, Jeannette S.

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Sharp force trauma research lacks agreement on reported error rates for correctly identifying toolmark characteristics on bone and cartilage. This study provides error rates for determining blade class (serrated, partially serrated, nonserrated) and type of edge bevel (left, right, even). Three analysts examined cuts to a wax medium, cartilage, and bone using two types of microscopes. Additionally, the observers examined impressions taken from the wax medium and the cartilage. Overall, a total of 504 observations were performed. Serrated blades were distinguishable from nonserrated blades due to their patterned striations. Some difficulties were encountered in distinguishing serrated and partially serrated blades; however, when these groups were considered together as one classification type (serrated), classification accuracy improved from 79% to 96%. Classification accuracy for edge bevel was 65%. Error rates were similar when comparing direct observation of the cut marks versus indirect observation (impressions). Additionally, the type of microscope used did not affect error rates.

AB - Sharp force trauma research lacks agreement on reported error rates for correctly identifying toolmark characteristics on bone and cartilage. This study provides error rates for determining blade class (serrated, partially serrated, nonserrated) and type of edge bevel (left, right, even). Three analysts examined cuts to a wax medium, cartilage, and bone using two types of microscopes. Additionally, the observers examined impressions taken from the wax medium and the cartilage. Overall, a total of 504 observations were performed. Serrated blades were distinguishable from nonserrated blades due to their patterned striations. Some difficulties were encountered in distinguishing serrated and partially serrated blades; however, when these groups were considered together as one classification type (serrated), classification accuracy improved from 79% to 96%. Classification accuracy for edge bevel was 65%. Error rates were similar when comparing direct observation of the cut marks versus indirect observation (impressions). Additionally, the type of microscope used did not affect error rates.

KW - Forensic anthropology

KW - Forensic science

KW - Knife wound

KW - Sharp force trauma

KW - Stab wound

KW - Striations

KW - Toolmarks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883558965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883558965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1556-4029.12180

DO - 10.1111/1556-4029.12180

M3 - Article

C2 - 23865497

AN - SCOPUS:84883558965

VL - 58

SP - 1119

EP - 1126

JO - Journal of Forensic Sciences

JF - Journal of Forensic Sciences

SN - 0022-1198

IS - 5

ER -