Minimally invasive esophagectomy

Alberto De Hoyos, Virginia R. Litle, James D. Luketich

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Minimally invasive esophagectomy can be safely performed in selected cases in centers specializing in minimally invasive esophageal surgery. Potential benefits include lessened physiologic insult, with decreased hospital stay and a more rapid recovery to full activity. Drawbacks include the cost of the disposable instrumentation and the steep learning curve. As thoracic surgeons continue to acquire expertise with this procedure, improved results may be expected. Prospective trials with longer follow-up will be required to confirm any advantages of MIE over conventional approaches. Open surgical approaches should remain the standard operation for esophagectomy in most institutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)631-647
Number of pages17
JournalSurgical Clinics of North America
Volume85
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2005

Fingerprint

Esophagectomy
Learning Curve
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Length of Stay
Thorax
Costs and Cost Analysis
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Minimally invasive esophagectomy. / De Hoyos, Alberto; Litle, Virginia R.; Luketich, James D.

In: Surgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 85, No. 3, 01.06.2005, p. 631-647.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

De Hoyos, Alberto ; Litle, Virginia R. ; Luketich, James D. / Minimally invasive esophagectomy. In: Surgical Clinics of North America. 2005 ; Vol. 85, No. 3. pp. 631-647.
@article{2397e49b3b91462dad9c9f2b94fe9bd1,
title = "Minimally invasive esophagectomy",
abstract = "Minimally invasive esophagectomy can be safely performed in selected cases in centers specializing in minimally invasive esophageal surgery. Potential benefits include lessened physiologic insult, with decreased hospital stay and a more rapid recovery to full activity. Drawbacks include the cost of the disposable instrumentation and the steep learning curve. As thoracic surgeons continue to acquire expertise with this procedure, improved results may be expected. Prospective trials with longer follow-up will be required to confirm any advantages of MIE over conventional approaches. Open surgical approaches should remain the standard operation for esophagectomy in most institutions.",
author = "{De Hoyos}, Alberto and Litle, {Virginia R.} and Luketich, {James D.}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.suc.2005.01.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "631--647",
journal = "Surgical Clinics of North America",
issn = "0039-6109",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive esophagectomy

AU - De Hoyos, Alberto

AU - Litle, Virginia R.

AU - Luketich, James D.

PY - 2005/6/1

Y1 - 2005/6/1

N2 - Minimally invasive esophagectomy can be safely performed in selected cases in centers specializing in minimally invasive esophageal surgery. Potential benefits include lessened physiologic insult, with decreased hospital stay and a more rapid recovery to full activity. Drawbacks include the cost of the disposable instrumentation and the steep learning curve. As thoracic surgeons continue to acquire expertise with this procedure, improved results may be expected. Prospective trials with longer follow-up will be required to confirm any advantages of MIE over conventional approaches. Open surgical approaches should remain the standard operation for esophagectomy in most institutions.

AB - Minimally invasive esophagectomy can be safely performed in selected cases in centers specializing in minimally invasive esophageal surgery. Potential benefits include lessened physiologic insult, with decreased hospital stay and a more rapid recovery to full activity. Drawbacks include the cost of the disposable instrumentation and the steep learning curve. As thoracic surgeons continue to acquire expertise with this procedure, improved results may be expected. Prospective trials with longer follow-up will be required to confirm any advantages of MIE over conventional approaches. Open surgical approaches should remain the standard operation for esophagectomy in most institutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20344376663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20344376663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.suc.2005.01.003

DO - 10.1016/j.suc.2005.01.003

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15927657

AN - SCOPUS:20344376663

VL - 85

SP - 631

EP - 647

JO - Surgical Clinics of North America

JF - Surgical Clinics of North America

SN - 0039-6109

IS - 3

ER -