Modification of Plusoptix referral criteria to enhance sensitivity and specificity during pediatric vision screening

Niraj R. Nathan, Sean P. Donahue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the impact of using several different proposed sets of referral criteria on the specificity and sensitivity of the plusoptiX S08 photoscreener for detecting amblyopia risk factors. Methods: During a 2-month period, 144 children ages 9 months to 14 years were screened at the Tennessee Lions Eye Center before receiving a comprehensive eye examination and cycloplegic refraction. Three previously published sets of referral criteria were used for screening, including the manufacturer's criteria and the criteria proposed by Arthur and colleagues, which are nearly identical to the gold standard examination failure thresholds proposed by the Vision Screening Committee of the American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS). Modifications of these criteria also were evaluated. The screening results obtained by the plusoptiX S08 were compared with the results from the gold standard pediatric ophthalmologic examination, and the respective sensitivities and specificities of each set of referral criteria in detecting amblyopia risk factors identified by the AAPOS Vision Screening Committee were calculated. Results: The manufacturer's criteria yielded high sensitivity (100%) but very low specificity (37%). The Arthur criteria, which used the values for the AAPOS-defined amblyopia risk factors as referral criteria, maintained sensitivity (89%) and greatly improved specificity (76%). Two modifications of the Arthur criteria further increased specificity with minimal loss of sensitivity. Conclusions: The manufacturer's criteria have excellent sensitivity but low specificity, warranting modification; other criteria increase specificity with minimal effect on sensitivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)551-555
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of AAPOS
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011

Fingerprint

Vision Screening
Amblyopia
Strabismus
Ophthalmology
Referral and Consultation
Pediatrics
Sensitivity and Specificity
Lions
Mydriatics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Modification of Plusoptix referral criteria to enhance sensitivity and specificity during pediatric vision screening. / Nathan, Niraj R.; Donahue, Sean P.

In: Journal of AAPOS, Vol. 15, No. 6, 01.12.2011, p. 551-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{356ee2f105e84fb2930a12287fcbdfc0,
title = "Modification of Plusoptix referral criteria to enhance sensitivity and specificity during pediatric vision screening",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine the impact of using several different proposed sets of referral criteria on the specificity and sensitivity of the plusoptiX S08 photoscreener for detecting amblyopia risk factors. Methods: During a 2-month period, 144 children ages 9 months to 14 years were screened at the Tennessee Lions Eye Center before receiving a comprehensive eye examination and cycloplegic refraction. Three previously published sets of referral criteria were used for screening, including the manufacturer's criteria and the criteria proposed by Arthur and colleagues, which are nearly identical to the gold standard examination failure thresholds proposed by the Vision Screening Committee of the American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS). Modifications of these criteria also were evaluated. The screening results obtained by the plusoptiX S08 were compared with the results from the gold standard pediatric ophthalmologic examination, and the respective sensitivities and specificities of each set of referral criteria in detecting amblyopia risk factors identified by the AAPOS Vision Screening Committee were calculated. Results: The manufacturer's criteria yielded high sensitivity (100{\%}) but very low specificity (37{\%}). The Arthur criteria, which used the values for the AAPOS-defined amblyopia risk factors as referral criteria, maintained sensitivity (89{\%}) and greatly improved specificity (76{\%}). Two modifications of the Arthur criteria further increased specificity with minimal loss of sensitivity. Conclusions: The manufacturer's criteria have excellent sensitivity but low specificity, warranting modification; other criteria increase specificity with minimal effect on sensitivity.",
author = "Nathan, {Niraj R.} and Donahue, {Sean P.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.08.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "551--555",
journal = "Journal of AAPOS",
issn = "1091-8531",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modification of Plusoptix referral criteria to enhance sensitivity and specificity during pediatric vision screening

AU - Nathan, Niraj R.

AU - Donahue, Sean P.

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Purpose: To determine the impact of using several different proposed sets of referral criteria on the specificity and sensitivity of the plusoptiX S08 photoscreener for detecting amblyopia risk factors. Methods: During a 2-month period, 144 children ages 9 months to 14 years were screened at the Tennessee Lions Eye Center before receiving a comprehensive eye examination and cycloplegic refraction. Three previously published sets of referral criteria were used for screening, including the manufacturer's criteria and the criteria proposed by Arthur and colleagues, which are nearly identical to the gold standard examination failure thresholds proposed by the Vision Screening Committee of the American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS). Modifications of these criteria also were evaluated. The screening results obtained by the plusoptiX S08 were compared with the results from the gold standard pediatric ophthalmologic examination, and the respective sensitivities and specificities of each set of referral criteria in detecting amblyopia risk factors identified by the AAPOS Vision Screening Committee were calculated. Results: The manufacturer's criteria yielded high sensitivity (100%) but very low specificity (37%). The Arthur criteria, which used the values for the AAPOS-defined amblyopia risk factors as referral criteria, maintained sensitivity (89%) and greatly improved specificity (76%). Two modifications of the Arthur criteria further increased specificity with minimal loss of sensitivity. Conclusions: The manufacturer's criteria have excellent sensitivity but low specificity, warranting modification; other criteria increase specificity with minimal effect on sensitivity.

AB - Purpose: To determine the impact of using several different proposed sets of referral criteria on the specificity and sensitivity of the plusoptiX S08 photoscreener for detecting amblyopia risk factors. Methods: During a 2-month period, 144 children ages 9 months to 14 years were screened at the Tennessee Lions Eye Center before receiving a comprehensive eye examination and cycloplegic refraction. Three previously published sets of referral criteria were used for screening, including the manufacturer's criteria and the criteria proposed by Arthur and colleagues, which are nearly identical to the gold standard examination failure thresholds proposed by the Vision Screening Committee of the American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS). Modifications of these criteria also were evaluated. The screening results obtained by the plusoptiX S08 were compared with the results from the gold standard pediatric ophthalmologic examination, and the respective sensitivities and specificities of each set of referral criteria in detecting amblyopia risk factors identified by the AAPOS Vision Screening Committee were calculated. Results: The manufacturer's criteria yielded high sensitivity (100%) but very low specificity (37%). The Arthur criteria, which used the values for the AAPOS-defined amblyopia risk factors as referral criteria, maintained sensitivity (89%) and greatly improved specificity (76%). Two modifications of the Arthur criteria further increased specificity with minimal loss of sensitivity. Conclusions: The manufacturer's criteria have excellent sensitivity but low specificity, warranting modification; other criteria increase specificity with minimal effect on sensitivity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83455262000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83455262000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.08.008

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 551

EP - 555

JO - Journal of AAPOS

JF - Journal of AAPOS

SN - 1091-8531

IS - 6

ER -