Modified iodine-paper technique for the standardized determination of sweat gland activation

Daniel Gagnon, Matthew S. Ganio, Rebekah A I Lucas, James Pearson, Craig G. Crandall, Glen P. Kenny

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quantifying sweat gland activation provides important information when explaining differences in sweat rate between populations and physiological conditions. However, no standard technique has been proposed to measure sweat gland activation, while the reliability of sweat gland activation measurements is unknown. We examined the interrater and internal reliability of the modified-iodine paper technique, as well as compared computer-aided analysis to manual counts of sweat gland activation. Iodine-impregnated paper was pressed against the skin of 35 participants in whom sweating was elicited by exercise in the heat or infusion of methylcholine. The number of active glands was subsequently determined by computer-aided analysis. In total, 382 measurements were used to evaluate: 1) agreement between computer analysis and manual counts; 2) the interrater reliability of computer analysis between independent investigators; and 3) the internal reliability of sweat gland activation measurements between duplicate samples. The number of glands identified with computer analysis did not differ from manual counts (68 ± 29 vs. 72 ± 24 glands/cm 2; P = 0.27). These measures were highly correlated (r = 0.77) with a mean bias ± limits of agreement of -4 ± 38 glands/cm 2. When comparing computer analysis measures between investigators, values were highly correlated (r = 0.95; P < 0.001) and the mean bias ± limits of agreement was 4 ± 18 glands/cm 2. Finally, duplicate measures of sweat gland activation were highly correlated (r = 0.88; P < 0.001) with a mean bias ± limits of agreement of 3 ± 29 glands/cm 2. These results favor the use of the modified-iodine paper technique with computer-aided analysis as a standard technique to reliably evaluate the number of active sweat glands.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1419-1425
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume112
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2012

Fingerprint

Sweat Glands
Iodine
Research Personnel
Sweating
Sweat
Hot Temperature
Skin
Population

Keywords

  • Heat loss
  • Heat-activated sweat glands
  • Sweat output
  • Sweat rate
  • Thermoregulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Modified iodine-paper technique for the standardized determination of sweat gland activation. / Gagnon, Daniel; Ganio, Matthew S.; Lucas, Rebekah A I; Pearson, James; Crandall, Craig G.; Kenny, Glen P.

In: Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 112, No. 8, 15.04.2012, p. 1419-1425.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gagnon, Daniel ; Ganio, Matthew S. ; Lucas, Rebekah A I ; Pearson, James ; Crandall, Craig G. ; Kenny, Glen P. / Modified iodine-paper technique for the standardized determination of sweat gland activation. In: Journal of Applied Physiology. 2012 ; Vol. 112, No. 8. pp. 1419-1425.
@article{9b6c1e90c14c4275a45ee28d8a03613e,
title = "Modified iodine-paper technique for the standardized determination of sweat gland activation",
abstract = "Quantifying sweat gland activation provides important information when explaining differences in sweat rate between populations and physiological conditions. However, no standard technique has been proposed to measure sweat gland activation, while the reliability of sweat gland activation measurements is unknown. We examined the interrater and internal reliability of the modified-iodine paper technique, as well as compared computer-aided analysis to manual counts of sweat gland activation. Iodine-impregnated paper was pressed against the skin of 35 participants in whom sweating was elicited by exercise in the heat or infusion of methylcholine. The number of active glands was subsequently determined by computer-aided analysis. In total, 382 measurements were used to evaluate: 1) agreement between computer analysis and manual counts; 2) the interrater reliability of computer analysis between independent investigators; and 3) the internal reliability of sweat gland activation measurements between duplicate samples. The number of glands identified with computer analysis did not differ from manual counts (68 ± 29 vs. 72 ± 24 glands/cm 2; P = 0.27). These measures were highly correlated (r = 0.77) with a mean bias ± limits of agreement of -4 ± 38 glands/cm 2. When comparing computer analysis measures between investigators, values were highly correlated (r = 0.95; P < 0.001) and the mean bias ± limits of agreement was 4 ± 18 glands/cm 2. Finally, duplicate measures of sweat gland activation were highly correlated (r = 0.88; P < 0.001) with a mean bias ± limits of agreement of 3 ± 29 glands/cm 2. These results favor the use of the modified-iodine paper technique with computer-aided analysis as a standard technique to reliably evaluate the number of active sweat glands.",
keywords = "Heat loss, Heat-activated sweat glands, Sweat output, Sweat rate, Thermoregulation",
author = "Daniel Gagnon and Ganio, {Matthew S.} and Lucas, {Rebekah A I} and James Pearson and Crandall, {Craig G.} and Kenny, {Glen P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1152/japplphysiol.01508.2011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "1419--1425",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "0161-7567",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modified iodine-paper technique for the standardized determination of sweat gland activation

AU - Gagnon, Daniel

AU - Ganio, Matthew S.

AU - Lucas, Rebekah A I

AU - Pearson, James

AU - Crandall, Craig G.

AU - Kenny, Glen P.

PY - 2012/4/15

Y1 - 2012/4/15

N2 - Quantifying sweat gland activation provides important information when explaining differences in sweat rate between populations and physiological conditions. However, no standard technique has been proposed to measure sweat gland activation, while the reliability of sweat gland activation measurements is unknown. We examined the interrater and internal reliability of the modified-iodine paper technique, as well as compared computer-aided analysis to manual counts of sweat gland activation. Iodine-impregnated paper was pressed against the skin of 35 participants in whom sweating was elicited by exercise in the heat or infusion of methylcholine. The number of active glands was subsequently determined by computer-aided analysis. In total, 382 measurements were used to evaluate: 1) agreement between computer analysis and manual counts; 2) the interrater reliability of computer analysis between independent investigators; and 3) the internal reliability of sweat gland activation measurements between duplicate samples. The number of glands identified with computer analysis did not differ from manual counts (68 ± 29 vs. 72 ± 24 glands/cm 2; P = 0.27). These measures were highly correlated (r = 0.77) with a mean bias ± limits of agreement of -4 ± 38 glands/cm 2. When comparing computer analysis measures between investigators, values were highly correlated (r = 0.95; P < 0.001) and the mean bias ± limits of agreement was 4 ± 18 glands/cm 2. Finally, duplicate measures of sweat gland activation were highly correlated (r = 0.88; P < 0.001) with a mean bias ± limits of agreement of 3 ± 29 glands/cm 2. These results favor the use of the modified-iodine paper technique with computer-aided analysis as a standard technique to reliably evaluate the number of active sweat glands.

AB - Quantifying sweat gland activation provides important information when explaining differences in sweat rate between populations and physiological conditions. However, no standard technique has been proposed to measure sweat gland activation, while the reliability of sweat gland activation measurements is unknown. We examined the interrater and internal reliability of the modified-iodine paper technique, as well as compared computer-aided analysis to manual counts of sweat gland activation. Iodine-impregnated paper was pressed against the skin of 35 participants in whom sweating was elicited by exercise in the heat or infusion of methylcholine. The number of active glands was subsequently determined by computer-aided analysis. In total, 382 measurements were used to evaluate: 1) agreement between computer analysis and manual counts; 2) the interrater reliability of computer analysis between independent investigators; and 3) the internal reliability of sweat gland activation measurements between duplicate samples. The number of glands identified with computer analysis did not differ from manual counts (68 ± 29 vs. 72 ± 24 glands/cm 2; P = 0.27). These measures were highly correlated (r = 0.77) with a mean bias ± limits of agreement of -4 ± 38 glands/cm 2. When comparing computer analysis measures between investigators, values were highly correlated (r = 0.95; P < 0.001) and the mean bias ± limits of agreement was 4 ± 18 glands/cm 2. Finally, duplicate measures of sweat gland activation were highly correlated (r = 0.88; P < 0.001) with a mean bias ± limits of agreement of 3 ± 29 glands/cm 2. These results favor the use of the modified-iodine paper technique with computer-aided analysis as a standard technique to reliably evaluate the number of active sweat glands.

KW - Heat loss

KW - Heat-activated sweat glands

KW - Sweat output

KW - Sweat rate

KW - Thermoregulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860337416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860337416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.01508.2011

DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.01508.2011

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 1419

EP - 1425

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 0161-7567

IS - 8

ER -