MO‐D‐ValB‐05: Commissioning An AC Electromagnetic Localization System for Radiation Therapy

T. Willoughby, S. Meeks, E. Vertatschitsch, S. Dimmer, J. Riley, J. Flynn, T. Solberg, N. Liu, T. Djemil, S. Jani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose/Objective: To establish a commissioning and acceptance test protocol for an AC electromagnetic tracking system for use in target localization and tracking during radiation therapy. (Calypso® 4D Localization System, Calypso Medical, Seattle, WA). Materials/Methods: Following installation of infrared cameras and electromagnetic system, compatibility tests were made to ensure the system did not interfere with radiation output, MLCs or IMRT field fluence. The collision space between the linac and the Calypso System was evaluated. System verification included calibration using software and calibration tools, one of which has embedded RF transponders and optical reflectors. End‐to‐end testing to assess localization accuracy included CT scan of a radiographic phantom with RF transponders, creation of four Calypso Plans, data entry to the Calypso System and execution of treatment sessions. Tracking accuracy was measured using a precision translation table for orthogonal motions ± 5 mm. Results: Calypso System did not affect normal clinical operations of radiation output, MLC, or IMRT field segmentation. Overall accuracy on ten systems at five institutions and 40 treatment plans was 0.068 ± 0.027 cm, incorporating contributing errors from the CT scans, identification of transponders in the phantom, and effects of radiation dose delivery. With stable environment, no systematic drift was noticed over 30 minute. Translations of precise increments from −0.50 cm to +0.05cm were accurately tracked with error of 0.00cm, −0.02cm and 0.01cm (lat, long, vert). The system maintained accuracy with monthly optical calibrations. Changes in system readout of ±0.05 cm (readout quantization) were noticed at certain gantry angles. Conclusion: Evaluations demonstrate the AC electromagnetic system with wireless transponders can be integrated into the radiotherapy environment with existing instrumentation and operates within the designed accuracy specification. Conflict of Interest: Work supported by Calypso Medical Technologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2161-2162
Number of pages2
JournalMedical Physics
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Electromagnetic Phenomena
Radiotherapy
Calibration
Imaging Phantoms
Radiation
Conflict of Interest
Radiation Effects
thiacloprid
Software
Technology
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Willoughby, T., Meeks, S., Vertatschitsch, E., Dimmer, S., Riley, J., Flynn, J., ... Jani, S. (2006). MO‐D‐ValB‐05: Commissioning An AC Electromagnetic Localization System for Radiation Therapy. Medical Physics, 33(6), 2161-2162. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2241419

MO‐D‐ValB‐05 : Commissioning An AC Electromagnetic Localization System for Radiation Therapy. / Willoughby, T.; Meeks, S.; Vertatschitsch, E.; Dimmer, S.; Riley, J.; Flynn, J.; Solberg, T.; Liu, N.; Djemil, T.; Jani, S.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2006, p. 2161-2162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Willoughby, T, Meeks, S, Vertatschitsch, E, Dimmer, S, Riley, J, Flynn, J, Solberg, T, Liu, N, Djemil, T & Jani, S 2006, 'MO‐D‐ValB‐05: Commissioning An AC Electromagnetic Localization System for Radiation Therapy', Medical Physics, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 2161-2162. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2241419
Willoughby T, Meeks S, Vertatschitsch E, Dimmer S, Riley J, Flynn J et al. MO‐D‐ValB‐05: Commissioning An AC Electromagnetic Localization System for Radiation Therapy. Medical Physics. 2006;33(6):2161-2162. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2241419
Willoughby, T. ; Meeks, S. ; Vertatschitsch, E. ; Dimmer, S. ; Riley, J. ; Flynn, J. ; Solberg, T. ; Liu, N. ; Djemil, T. ; Jani, S. / MO‐D‐ValB‐05 : Commissioning An AC Electromagnetic Localization System for Radiation Therapy. In: Medical Physics. 2006 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 2161-2162.
@article{abba3bd7cc0a4a19b8253554acd3b868,
title = "MO‐D‐ValB‐05: Commissioning An AC Electromagnetic Localization System for Radiation Therapy",
abstract = "Purpose/Objective: To establish a commissioning and acceptance test protocol for an AC electromagnetic tracking system for use in target localization and tracking during radiation therapy. (Calypso{\circledR} 4D Localization System, Calypso Medical, Seattle, WA). Materials/Methods: Following installation of infrared cameras and electromagnetic system, compatibility tests were made to ensure the system did not interfere with radiation output, MLCs or IMRT field fluence. The collision space between the linac and the Calypso System was evaluated. System verification included calibration using software and calibration tools, one of which has embedded RF transponders and optical reflectors. End‐to‐end testing to assess localization accuracy included CT scan of a radiographic phantom with RF transponders, creation of four Calypso Plans, data entry to the Calypso System and execution of treatment sessions. Tracking accuracy was measured using a precision translation table for orthogonal motions ± 5 mm. Results: Calypso System did not affect normal clinical operations of radiation output, MLC, or IMRT field segmentation. Overall accuracy on ten systems at five institutions and 40 treatment plans was 0.068 ± 0.027 cm, incorporating contributing errors from the CT scans, identification of transponders in the phantom, and effects of radiation dose delivery. With stable environment, no systematic drift was noticed over 30 minute. Translations of precise increments from −0.50 cm to +0.05cm were accurately tracked with error of 0.00cm, −0.02cm and 0.01cm (lat, long, vert). The system maintained accuracy with monthly optical calibrations. Changes in system readout of ±0.05 cm (readout quantization) were noticed at certain gantry angles. Conclusion: Evaluations demonstrate the AC electromagnetic system with wireless transponders can be integrated into the radiotherapy environment with existing instrumentation and operates within the designed accuracy specification. Conflict of Interest: Work supported by Calypso Medical Technologies.",
author = "T. Willoughby and S. Meeks and E. Vertatschitsch and S. Dimmer and J. Riley and J. Flynn and T. Solberg and N. Liu and T. Djemil and S. Jani",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1118/1.2241419",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "2161--2162",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MO‐D‐ValB‐05

T2 - Commissioning An AC Electromagnetic Localization System for Radiation Therapy

AU - Willoughby, T.

AU - Meeks, S.

AU - Vertatschitsch, E.

AU - Dimmer, S.

AU - Riley, J.

AU - Flynn, J.

AU - Solberg, T.

AU - Liu, N.

AU - Djemil, T.

AU - Jani, S.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Purpose/Objective: To establish a commissioning and acceptance test protocol for an AC electromagnetic tracking system for use in target localization and tracking during radiation therapy. (Calypso® 4D Localization System, Calypso Medical, Seattle, WA). Materials/Methods: Following installation of infrared cameras and electromagnetic system, compatibility tests were made to ensure the system did not interfere with radiation output, MLCs or IMRT field fluence. The collision space between the linac and the Calypso System was evaluated. System verification included calibration using software and calibration tools, one of which has embedded RF transponders and optical reflectors. End‐to‐end testing to assess localization accuracy included CT scan of a radiographic phantom with RF transponders, creation of four Calypso Plans, data entry to the Calypso System and execution of treatment sessions. Tracking accuracy was measured using a precision translation table for orthogonal motions ± 5 mm. Results: Calypso System did not affect normal clinical operations of radiation output, MLC, or IMRT field segmentation. Overall accuracy on ten systems at five institutions and 40 treatment plans was 0.068 ± 0.027 cm, incorporating contributing errors from the CT scans, identification of transponders in the phantom, and effects of radiation dose delivery. With stable environment, no systematic drift was noticed over 30 minute. Translations of precise increments from −0.50 cm to +0.05cm were accurately tracked with error of 0.00cm, −0.02cm and 0.01cm (lat, long, vert). The system maintained accuracy with monthly optical calibrations. Changes in system readout of ±0.05 cm (readout quantization) were noticed at certain gantry angles. Conclusion: Evaluations demonstrate the AC electromagnetic system with wireless transponders can be integrated into the radiotherapy environment with existing instrumentation and operates within the designed accuracy specification. Conflict of Interest: Work supported by Calypso Medical Technologies.

AB - Purpose/Objective: To establish a commissioning and acceptance test protocol for an AC electromagnetic tracking system for use in target localization and tracking during radiation therapy. (Calypso® 4D Localization System, Calypso Medical, Seattle, WA). Materials/Methods: Following installation of infrared cameras and electromagnetic system, compatibility tests were made to ensure the system did not interfere with radiation output, MLCs or IMRT field fluence. The collision space between the linac and the Calypso System was evaluated. System verification included calibration using software and calibration tools, one of which has embedded RF transponders and optical reflectors. End‐to‐end testing to assess localization accuracy included CT scan of a radiographic phantom with RF transponders, creation of four Calypso Plans, data entry to the Calypso System and execution of treatment sessions. Tracking accuracy was measured using a precision translation table for orthogonal motions ± 5 mm. Results: Calypso System did not affect normal clinical operations of radiation output, MLC, or IMRT field segmentation. Overall accuracy on ten systems at five institutions and 40 treatment plans was 0.068 ± 0.027 cm, incorporating contributing errors from the CT scans, identification of transponders in the phantom, and effects of radiation dose delivery. With stable environment, no systematic drift was noticed over 30 minute. Translations of precise increments from −0.50 cm to +0.05cm were accurately tracked with error of 0.00cm, −0.02cm and 0.01cm (lat, long, vert). The system maintained accuracy with monthly optical calibrations. Changes in system readout of ±0.05 cm (readout quantization) were noticed at certain gantry angles. Conclusion: Evaluations demonstrate the AC electromagnetic system with wireless transponders can be integrated into the radiotherapy environment with existing instrumentation and operates within the designed accuracy specification. Conflict of Interest: Work supported by Calypso Medical Technologies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024811225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024811225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2241419

DO - 10.1118/1.2241419

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024811225

VL - 33

SP - 2161

EP - 2162

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -