MO‐E‐M100F‐05: Fluoroscopic Tracking of Multiple Implanted Fiducial Markers Using Multiple Object Tracking Algorithm

X. Tang, G. Sharp, S. Jiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a multiple fiducial marker tracking system providing precise tumor localization for beam gating and tracking. Method and Materials: We developed a multiple marker tracking system allowing us to track implanted fiducial markers for the treatment of mobile tumors. For each patient, LAT and AP fluoroscopic videos were acquired during the treatment. For each fluoroscopic frame, we first applied a prediction module to predict the marker positions and then a detection module to detect markers in the area around the predicted positions. Then, we applied a multiple object tracking algorithm to identify the true markers among all the detected ones. Breathing pattern information was used to improve the tracking performance. Four criteria were used to identify tracking failures, and when tracking failure happened, the system could immediately inform the user and disable the treatment beam. Results: We compared the performance of the proposed system to a conventional tracking system. To test the robustness of the tracking system, artificial markers were added around the true markers to generate false matches. The conventional system easily misses tracking markers in the presence of artificial markers; furthermore, it cannot detect subsequent tracking failures. Our proposed system could track markers well in the presence of artificial markers, and it could also successfully detect tracking failures. Our proposed system achieved a 0% failure rate almost all the time, and it yielded a low e95 (the maximum marker tracking error at 95% confidence level) — less than 1.5 mm. Conclusion: The proposed marker tracking system can track multiple markers simultaneously without confusion and it is robust enough to continue tracking even when the marker is moving behind bony anatomy. It can also detect tracking failures and inform the user. Conflict of Interest: Research is partially sponsored by an NCI grant (1 R21 CA110177 A 01A1).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Fiducial Markers
Conflict of Interest
Organized Financing
Neoplasms
Anatomy
Respiration
Therapeutics
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

MO‐E‐M100F‐05 : Fluoroscopic Tracking of Multiple Implanted Fiducial Markers Using Multiple Object Tracking Algorithm. / Tang, X.; Sharp, G.; Jiang, S.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8200fe08a85244c1b644a43c68967f6f,
title = "MO‐E‐M100F‐05: Fluoroscopic Tracking of Multiple Implanted Fiducial Markers Using Multiple Object Tracking Algorithm",
abstract = "Purpose: To develop a multiple fiducial marker tracking system providing precise tumor localization for beam gating and tracking. Method and Materials: We developed a multiple marker tracking system allowing us to track implanted fiducial markers for the treatment of mobile tumors. For each patient, LAT and AP fluoroscopic videos were acquired during the treatment. For each fluoroscopic frame, we first applied a prediction module to predict the marker positions and then a detection module to detect markers in the area around the predicted positions. Then, we applied a multiple object tracking algorithm to identify the true markers among all the detected ones. Breathing pattern information was used to improve the tracking performance. Four criteria were used to identify tracking failures, and when tracking failure happened, the system could immediately inform the user and disable the treatment beam. Results: We compared the performance of the proposed system to a conventional tracking system. To test the robustness of the tracking system, artificial markers were added around the true markers to generate false matches. The conventional system easily misses tracking markers in the presence of artificial markers; furthermore, it cannot detect subsequent tracking failures. Our proposed system could track markers well in the presence of artificial markers, and it could also successfully detect tracking failures. Our proposed system achieved a 0{\%} failure rate almost all the time, and it yielded a low e95 (the maximum marker tracking error at 95{\%} confidence level) — less than 1.5 mm. Conclusion: The proposed marker tracking system can track multiple markers simultaneously without confusion and it is robust enough to continue tracking even when the marker is moving behind bony anatomy. It can also detect tracking failures and inform the user. Conflict of Interest: Research is partially sponsored by an NCI grant (1 R21 CA110177 A 01A1).",
author = "X. Tang and G. Sharp and S. Jiang",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1118/1.2761271",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MO‐E‐M100F‐05

T2 - Fluoroscopic Tracking of Multiple Implanted Fiducial Markers Using Multiple Object Tracking Algorithm

AU - Tang, X.

AU - Sharp, G.

AU - Jiang, S.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Purpose: To develop a multiple fiducial marker tracking system providing precise tumor localization for beam gating and tracking. Method and Materials: We developed a multiple marker tracking system allowing us to track implanted fiducial markers for the treatment of mobile tumors. For each patient, LAT and AP fluoroscopic videos were acquired during the treatment. For each fluoroscopic frame, we first applied a prediction module to predict the marker positions and then a detection module to detect markers in the area around the predicted positions. Then, we applied a multiple object tracking algorithm to identify the true markers among all the detected ones. Breathing pattern information was used to improve the tracking performance. Four criteria were used to identify tracking failures, and when tracking failure happened, the system could immediately inform the user and disable the treatment beam. Results: We compared the performance of the proposed system to a conventional tracking system. To test the robustness of the tracking system, artificial markers were added around the true markers to generate false matches. The conventional system easily misses tracking markers in the presence of artificial markers; furthermore, it cannot detect subsequent tracking failures. Our proposed system could track markers well in the presence of artificial markers, and it could also successfully detect tracking failures. Our proposed system achieved a 0% failure rate almost all the time, and it yielded a low e95 (the maximum marker tracking error at 95% confidence level) — less than 1.5 mm. Conclusion: The proposed marker tracking system can track multiple markers simultaneously without confusion and it is robust enough to continue tracking even when the marker is moving behind bony anatomy. It can also detect tracking failures and inform the user. Conflict of Interest: Research is partially sponsored by an NCI grant (1 R21 CA110177 A 01A1).

AB - Purpose: To develop a multiple fiducial marker tracking system providing precise tumor localization for beam gating and tracking. Method and Materials: We developed a multiple marker tracking system allowing us to track implanted fiducial markers for the treatment of mobile tumors. For each patient, LAT and AP fluoroscopic videos were acquired during the treatment. For each fluoroscopic frame, we first applied a prediction module to predict the marker positions and then a detection module to detect markers in the area around the predicted positions. Then, we applied a multiple object tracking algorithm to identify the true markers among all the detected ones. Breathing pattern information was used to improve the tracking performance. Four criteria were used to identify tracking failures, and when tracking failure happened, the system could immediately inform the user and disable the treatment beam. Results: We compared the performance of the proposed system to a conventional tracking system. To test the robustness of the tracking system, artificial markers were added around the true markers to generate false matches. The conventional system easily misses tracking markers in the presence of artificial markers; furthermore, it cannot detect subsequent tracking failures. Our proposed system could track markers well in the presence of artificial markers, and it could also successfully detect tracking failures. Our proposed system achieved a 0% failure rate almost all the time, and it yielded a low e95 (the maximum marker tracking error at 95% confidence level) — less than 1.5 mm. Conclusion: The proposed marker tracking system can track multiple markers simultaneously without confusion and it is robust enough to continue tracking even when the marker is moving behind bony anatomy. It can also detect tracking failures and inform the user. Conflict of Interest: Research is partially sponsored by an NCI grant (1 R21 CA110177 A 01A1).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024809332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024809332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2761271

DO - 10.1118/1.2761271

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024809332

VL - 34

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -