Molecular diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor in routinely processed tissue: A comparison of two FISH strategies and RT-PCR in malignant round cell tumors

Robert S. Bridge, Veena Rajaram, Louis P. Dehner, John D. Pfeifer, Arie Perry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

122 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (EWS/PNET) is a diagnostically challenging malignant round cell tumor with signature translocations involving the EWS gene. These translocations are detectable with both reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. However, RT-PCR is less sensitive in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded than frozen tissue. Similarly, commercial FISH probes have recently become available, but have yet to be rigorously tested in the clinical setting. Therefore, we have compared RT-PCR with FISH using 'home brew' fusion probes for Ewing sarcoma (EWS)-FLI1 and a commercial EWS break apart probe set in 67 archival round cell tumors, including 27 EWS/PNETs. Sensitivities and specificities for both FISH assays were 91 and 100%, respectively, whereas RT-PCR had a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 85%. The break apart strategy was easier to interpret than probe fusion approach. We conclude that FISH is a more sensitive and reliable ancillary technique than RT-PCR for the diagnosis of EWS/PNET in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, although the latter provides additional information regarding fusion transcript subtype and prognosis. The commercial break apart probe set is both readily available and easy to interpret, making it particularly attractive. Nonetheless, complex round cell tumors often benefit from molecular testing with multiple methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalModern Pathology
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2006

Fingerprint

Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors
Ewing's Sarcoma
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Paraffin
Formaldehyde
Neoplasms
Sensitivity and Specificity
Genes

Keywords

  • Ewing sarcoma
  • FISH
  • Fusion transcript
  • Molecular diagnostics
  • Primitive neuroectodermal tumor
  • RT-PCR
  • Translocation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Molecular diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor in routinely processed tissue : A comparison of two FISH strategies and RT-PCR in malignant round cell tumors. / Bridge, Robert S.; Rajaram, Veena; Dehner, Louis P.; Pfeifer, John D.; Perry, Arie.

In: Modern Pathology, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.2006, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{598fa913970543e9a08bde52976a1eef,
title = "Molecular diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor in routinely processed tissue: A comparison of two FISH strategies and RT-PCR in malignant round cell tumors",
abstract = "Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (EWS/PNET) is a diagnostically challenging malignant round cell tumor with signature translocations involving the EWS gene. These translocations are detectable with both reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. However, RT-PCR is less sensitive in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded than frozen tissue. Similarly, commercial FISH probes have recently become available, but have yet to be rigorously tested in the clinical setting. Therefore, we have compared RT-PCR with FISH using 'home brew' fusion probes for Ewing sarcoma (EWS)-FLI1 and a commercial EWS break apart probe set in 67 archival round cell tumors, including 27 EWS/PNETs. Sensitivities and specificities for both FISH assays were 91 and 100{\%}, respectively, whereas RT-PCR had a sensitivity of 54{\%} and a specificity of 85{\%}. The break apart strategy was easier to interpret than probe fusion approach. We conclude that FISH is a more sensitive and reliable ancillary technique than RT-PCR for the diagnosis of EWS/PNET in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, although the latter provides additional information regarding fusion transcript subtype and prognosis. The commercial break apart probe set is both readily available and easy to interpret, making it particularly attractive. Nonetheless, complex round cell tumors often benefit from molecular testing with multiple methods.",
keywords = "Ewing sarcoma, FISH, Fusion transcript, Molecular diagnostics, Primitive neuroectodermal tumor, RT-PCR, Translocation",
author = "Bridge, {Robert S.} and Veena Rajaram and Dehner, {Louis P.} and Pfeifer, {John D.} and Arie Perry",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1038/modpathol.3800486",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc",
issn = "0893-3952",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Molecular diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor in routinely processed tissue

T2 - A comparison of two FISH strategies and RT-PCR in malignant round cell tumors

AU - Bridge, Robert S.

AU - Rajaram, Veena

AU - Dehner, Louis P.

AU - Pfeifer, John D.

AU - Perry, Arie

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (EWS/PNET) is a diagnostically challenging malignant round cell tumor with signature translocations involving the EWS gene. These translocations are detectable with both reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. However, RT-PCR is less sensitive in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded than frozen tissue. Similarly, commercial FISH probes have recently become available, but have yet to be rigorously tested in the clinical setting. Therefore, we have compared RT-PCR with FISH using 'home brew' fusion probes for Ewing sarcoma (EWS)-FLI1 and a commercial EWS break apart probe set in 67 archival round cell tumors, including 27 EWS/PNETs. Sensitivities and specificities for both FISH assays were 91 and 100%, respectively, whereas RT-PCR had a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 85%. The break apart strategy was easier to interpret than probe fusion approach. We conclude that FISH is a more sensitive and reliable ancillary technique than RT-PCR for the diagnosis of EWS/PNET in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, although the latter provides additional information regarding fusion transcript subtype and prognosis. The commercial break apart probe set is both readily available and easy to interpret, making it particularly attractive. Nonetheless, complex round cell tumors often benefit from molecular testing with multiple methods.

AB - Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (EWS/PNET) is a diagnostically challenging malignant round cell tumor with signature translocations involving the EWS gene. These translocations are detectable with both reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. However, RT-PCR is less sensitive in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded than frozen tissue. Similarly, commercial FISH probes have recently become available, but have yet to be rigorously tested in the clinical setting. Therefore, we have compared RT-PCR with FISH using 'home brew' fusion probes for Ewing sarcoma (EWS)-FLI1 and a commercial EWS break apart probe set in 67 archival round cell tumors, including 27 EWS/PNETs. Sensitivities and specificities for both FISH assays were 91 and 100%, respectively, whereas RT-PCR had a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 85%. The break apart strategy was easier to interpret than probe fusion approach. We conclude that FISH is a more sensitive and reliable ancillary technique than RT-PCR for the diagnosis of EWS/PNET in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, although the latter provides additional information regarding fusion transcript subtype and prognosis. The commercial break apart probe set is both readily available and easy to interpret, making it particularly attractive. Nonetheless, complex round cell tumors often benefit from molecular testing with multiple methods.

KW - Ewing sarcoma

KW - FISH

KW - Fusion transcript

KW - Molecular diagnostics

KW - Primitive neuroectodermal tumor

KW - RT-PCR

KW - Translocation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32844474047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32844474047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/modpathol.3800486

DO - 10.1038/modpathol.3800486

M3 - Article

C2 - 16258512

AN - SCOPUS:32844474047

VL - 19

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc

JF - Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc

SN - 0893-3952

IS - 1

ER -