MRI scanner-independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients

Youngseob Seo, Zhiyue J. Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure specific absorption rate (SAR) during MRI scanning using a human torso phantom through quantification of diffusion coefficients independently of those reported by the scanner software for five 1.5 and 3 T clinical MRI systems from different vendors. Methods: A quadrature body coil transmitted the RF power and a body array coil received the signals. With diffusion tensor imaging, SAR values for three MRI sequences were measured on the five scanners and compared to the nominal values calculated by the scanners. Results: For the GE 1.5 T MRI system, the MRI scanner-reported SAR value was 1.58 W kg-1 and the measured SAR value was 1.38 W kg-1. For the Philips 1.5 T MRI scanner, the MRI system-reported SAR value was 1.48 W kg-1 and the measured value was 1.39 W kg-1. For the Siemens 3 T MRI system, the reported SAR value was 2.5 W kg-1 and the measured SAR value was 1.96 W kg-1. For two Philips 3 T MRI scanners, the reported SAR values were 1.5 W kg-1 and the measured values were 1.94 and 1.96 W kg-1. The percentage differences between the measured and reported SAR values on the GE 1.5 T, Philips 1.5 T, Siemens 3 T, and Philips 3 T were 13.5, 6.3, 24.2, 25.6, and 26.6% respectively. Conclusion: The scanner-independent SAR measurements using diffusion coefficients described in this study can play a significant role in estimating accurate SAR values as a standardized method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)224-229
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Magnetic resonance imaging
scanners
diffusion coefficient
Diffusion tensor imaging
coils
torso
Torso
Diffusion Tensor Imaging
quadratures
Scanning
estimating
Software
tensors
computer programs
scanning

Keywords

  • Diffusion coefficient
  • Diffusion tensor imaging
  • Human torso phantom
  • MR safety
  • Specific absorption rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Instrumentation
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

MRI scanner-independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients. / Seo, Youngseob; Wang, Zhiyue J.

In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 18, No. 4, 01.07.2017, p. 224-229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c10f5427fe134a51acaf39940d25c8ca,
title = "MRI scanner-independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure specific absorption rate (SAR) during MRI scanning using a human torso phantom through quantification of diffusion coefficients independently of those reported by the scanner software for five 1.5 and 3 T clinical MRI systems from different vendors. Methods: A quadrature body coil transmitted the RF power and a body array coil received the signals. With diffusion tensor imaging, SAR values for three MRI sequences were measured on the five scanners and compared to the nominal values calculated by the scanners. Results: For the GE 1.5 T MRI system, the MRI scanner-reported SAR value was 1.58 W kg-1 and the measured SAR value was 1.38 W kg-1. For the Philips 1.5 T MRI scanner, the MRI system-reported SAR value was 1.48 W kg-1 and the measured value was 1.39 W kg-1. For the Siemens 3 T MRI system, the reported SAR value was 2.5 W kg-1 and the measured SAR value was 1.96 W kg-1. For two Philips 3 T MRI scanners, the reported SAR values were 1.5 W kg-1 and the measured values were 1.94 and 1.96 W kg-1. The percentage differences between the measured and reported SAR values on the GE 1.5 T, Philips 1.5 T, Siemens 3 T, and Philips 3 T were 13.5, 6.3, 24.2, 25.6, and 26.6{\%} respectively. Conclusion: The scanner-independent SAR measurements using diffusion coefficients described in this study can play a significant role in estimating accurate SAR values as a standardized method.",
keywords = "Diffusion coefficient, Diffusion tensor imaging, Human torso phantom, MR safety, Specific absorption rate",
author = "Youngseob Seo and Wang, {Zhiyue J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acm2.12095",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "224--229",
journal = "Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics",
issn = "1526-9914",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MRI scanner-independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients

AU - Seo, Youngseob

AU - Wang, Zhiyue J.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure specific absorption rate (SAR) during MRI scanning using a human torso phantom through quantification of diffusion coefficients independently of those reported by the scanner software for five 1.5 and 3 T clinical MRI systems from different vendors. Methods: A quadrature body coil transmitted the RF power and a body array coil received the signals. With diffusion tensor imaging, SAR values for three MRI sequences were measured on the five scanners and compared to the nominal values calculated by the scanners. Results: For the GE 1.5 T MRI system, the MRI scanner-reported SAR value was 1.58 W kg-1 and the measured SAR value was 1.38 W kg-1. For the Philips 1.5 T MRI scanner, the MRI system-reported SAR value was 1.48 W kg-1 and the measured value was 1.39 W kg-1. For the Siemens 3 T MRI system, the reported SAR value was 2.5 W kg-1 and the measured SAR value was 1.96 W kg-1. For two Philips 3 T MRI scanners, the reported SAR values were 1.5 W kg-1 and the measured values were 1.94 and 1.96 W kg-1. The percentage differences between the measured and reported SAR values on the GE 1.5 T, Philips 1.5 T, Siemens 3 T, and Philips 3 T were 13.5, 6.3, 24.2, 25.6, and 26.6% respectively. Conclusion: The scanner-independent SAR measurements using diffusion coefficients described in this study can play a significant role in estimating accurate SAR values as a standardized method.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure specific absorption rate (SAR) during MRI scanning using a human torso phantom through quantification of diffusion coefficients independently of those reported by the scanner software for five 1.5 and 3 T clinical MRI systems from different vendors. Methods: A quadrature body coil transmitted the RF power and a body array coil received the signals. With diffusion tensor imaging, SAR values for three MRI sequences were measured on the five scanners and compared to the nominal values calculated by the scanners. Results: For the GE 1.5 T MRI system, the MRI scanner-reported SAR value was 1.58 W kg-1 and the measured SAR value was 1.38 W kg-1. For the Philips 1.5 T MRI scanner, the MRI system-reported SAR value was 1.48 W kg-1 and the measured value was 1.39 W kg-1. For the Siemens 3 T MRI system, the reported SAR value was 2.5 W kg-1 and the measured SAR value was 1.96 W kg-1. For two Philips 3 T MRI scanners, the reported SAR values were 1.5 W kg-1 and the measured values were 1.94 and 1.96 W kg-1. The percentage differences between the measured and reported SAR values on the GE 1.5 T, Philips 1.5 T, Siemens 3 T, and Philips 3 T were 13.5, 6.3, 24.2, 25.6, and 26.6% respectively. Conclusion: The scanner-independent SAR measurements using diffusion coefficients described in this study can play a significant role in estimating accurate SAR values as a standardized method.

KW - Diffusion coefficient

KW - Diffusion tensor imaging

KW - Human torso phantom

KW - MR safety

KW - Specific absorption rate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018761643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018761643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acm2.12095

DO - 10.1002/acm2.12095

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 224

EP - 229

JO - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

SN - 1526-9914

IS - 4

ER -