Multi-detector row CT in evaluation of 94 living renal donors by readers with varied experience

Dushyant V. Sahani, Neeraj Rastogi, Alan C. Greenfield, Sanjeeva P. Kalva, Dicken Ko, Sanjay Saini, Gordon Harris, Peter R. Mueller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the accuracy of four-section multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of renal transplant donors when scans are read by one of multiple readers with varied levels of expertise, by using surgery as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Informed consent was waived. Between October 1999 and March 2003, 94 renal donors (42 men, 52 women; mean age, 44 years) underwent four-section multi-detector row CT. Unenhanced scanning of the abdomen was performed with 5-mm section thickness and table speed of 15 mm per rotation. Next, 135-150 mL of nonionic iodinated (300 mg/mL) contrast material was injected intravenously at a rate of 4-5 mL/sec. Contrast material-enhanced CT was initiated 20-25 seconds, 65-70 seconds, and 10 minutes after start of injection. Arterial phase scanning was performed with 1.25-mm section thickness and 7.5-mm table speed. Venous and excretory phase scanning was performed with 2.5-mm section thickness and 15-mm table speed. Each scan was evaluated independently by one of 11 readers for renal vascular and ureteral anatomic variants. Findings at CT were compared with those at surgery. Sensitivity and specificity (with 95% confidence intervals) and accuracy of CT were calculated on the basis of presence or absence of variant anatomy at surgery. RESULTS: CT depicted 107 of 114 renal arteries confirmed at surgery; seven accessory arteries were missed in six donor kidneys. CT depicted 95 of 98 renal veins confirmed at surgery. Sensitivity and specificity of CT were 66% and 100%, 75% and 100%, and 50% and 100%, and overall accuracy was 94%, 97%, and 99%, for identification of variant anatomy of renal arteries, veins, and ureters, respectively. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT as the sole imaging technique in the preoperative evaluation of living renal donors is accurate even when images are read by multiple readers with varied levels of expertise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)905-910
Number of pages6
JournalRadiology
Volume235
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Living Donors
Tomography
Kidney
Renal Veins
Tissue Donors
Renal Artery
Contrast Media
Anatomy
Sensitivity and Specificity
Research Ethics Committees
Social Responsibility
Health Insurance
Ureter
Informed Consent
Abdomen
Blood Vessels
Retrospective Studies
Arteries
Confidence Intervals
Injections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Sahani, D. V., Rastogi, N., Greenfield, A. C., Kalva, S. P., Ko, D., Saini, S., ... Mueller, P. R. (2005). Multi-detector row CT in evaluation of 94 living renal donors by readers with varied experience. Radiology, 235(3), 905-910. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353040496

Multi-detector row CT in evaluation of 94 living renal donors by readers with varied experience. / Sahani, Dushyant V.; Rastogi, Neeraj; Greenfield, Alan C.; Kalva, Sanjeeva P.; Ko, Dicken; Saini, Sanjay; Harris, Gordon; Mueller, Peter R.

In: Radiology, Vol. 235, No. 3, 06.2005, p. 905-910.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sahani, DV, Rastogi, N, Greenfield, AC, Kalva, SP, Ko, D, Saini, S, Harris, G & Mueller, PR 2005, 'Multi-detector row CT in evaluation of 94 living renal donors by readers with varied experience', Radiology, vol. 235, no. 3, pp. 905-910. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353040496
Sahani DV, Rastogi N, Greenfield AC, Kalva SP, Ko D, Saini S et al. Multi-detector row CT in evaluation of 94 living renal donors by readers with varied experience. Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):905-910. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353040496
Sahani, Dushyant V. ; Rastogi, Neeraj ; Greenfield, Alan C. ; Kalva, Sanjeeva P. ; Ko, Dicken ; Saini, Sanjay ; Harris, Gordon ; Mueller, Peter R. / Multi-detector row CT in evaluation of 94 living renal donors by readers with varied experience. In: Radiology. 2005 ; Vol. 235, No. 3. pp. 905-910.
@article{bdf280c5f7424aab90909d874a714fa5,
title = "Multi-detector row CT in evaluation of 94 living renal donors by readers with varied experience",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the accuracy of four-section multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of renal transplant donors when scans are read by one of multiple readers with varied levels of expertise, by using surgery as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Informed consent was waived. Between October 1999 and March 2003, 94 renal donors (42 men, 52 women; mean age, 44 years) underwent four-section multi-detector row CT. Unenhanced scanning of the abdomen was performed with 5-mm section thickness and table speed of 15 mm per rotation. Next, 135-150 mL of nonionic iodinated (300 mg/mL) contrast material was injected intravenously at a rate of 4-5 mL/sec. Contrast material-enhanced CT was initiated 20-25 seconds, 65-70 seconds, and 10 minutes after start of injection. Arterial phase scanning was performed with 1.25-mm section thickness and 7.5-mm table speed. Venous and excretory phase scanning was performed with 2.5-mm section thickness and 15-mm table speed. Each scan was evaluated independently by one of 11 readers for renal vascular and ureteral anatomic variants. Findings at CT were compared with those at surgery. Sensitivity and specificity (with 95{\%} confidence intervals) and accuracy of CT were calculated on the basis of presence or absence of variant anatomy at surgery. RESULTS: CT depicted 107 of 114 renal arteries confirmed at surgery; seven accessory arteries were missed in six donor kidneys. CT depicted 95 of 98 renal veins confirmed at surgery. Sensitivity and specificity of CT were 66{\%} and 100{\%}, 75{\%} and 100{\%}, and 50{\%} and 100{\%}, and overall accuracy was 94{\%}, 97{\%}, and 99{\%}, for identification of variant anatomy of renal arteries, veins, and ureters, respectively. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT as the sole imaging technique in the preoperative evaluation of living renal donors is accurate even when images are read by multiple readers with varied levels of expertise.",
author = "Sahani, {Dushyant V.} and Neeraj Rastogi and Greenfield, {Alan C.} and Kalva, {Sanjeeva P.} and Dicken Ko and Sanjay Saini and Gordon Harris and Mueller, {Peter R.}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1148/radiol.2353040496",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "235",
pages = "905--910",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-detector row CT in evaluation of 94 living renal donors by readers with varied experience

AU - Sahani, Dushyant V.

AU - Rastogi, Neeraj

AU - Greenfield, Alan C.

AU - Kalva, Sanjeeva P.

AU - Ko, Dicken

AU - Saini, Sanjay

AU - Harris, Gordon

AU - Mueller, Peter R.

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the accuracy of four-section multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of renal transplant donors when scans are read by one of multiple readers with varied levels of expertise, by using surgery as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Informed consent was waived. Between October 1999 and March 2003, 94 renal donors (42 men, 52 women; mean age, 44 years) underwent four-section multi-detector row CT. Unenhanced scanning of the abdomen was performed with 5-mm section thickness and table speed of 15 mm per rotation. Next, 135-150 mL of nonionic iodinated (300 mg/mL) contrast material was injected intravenously at a rate of 4-5 mL/sec. Contrast material-enhanced CT was initiated 20-25 seconds, 65-70 seconds, and 10 minutes after start of injection. Arterial phase scanning was performed with 1.25-mm section thickness and 7.5-mm table speed. Venous and excretory phase scanning was performed with 2.5-mm section thickness and 15-mm table speed. Each scan was evaluated independently by one of 11 readers for renal vascular and ureteral anatomic variants. Findings at CT were compared with those at surgery. Sensitivity and specificity (with 95% confidence intervals) and accuracy of CT were calculated on the basis of presence or absence of variant anatomy at surgery. RESULTS: CT depicted 107 of 114 renal arteries confirmed at surgery; seven accessory arteries were missed in six donor kidneys. CT depicted 95 of 98 renal veins confirmed at surgery. Sensitivity and specificity of CT were 66% and 100%, 75% and 100%, and 50% and 100%, and overall accuracy was 94%, 97%, and 99%, for identification of variant anatomy of renal arteries, veins, and ureters, respectively. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT as the sole imaging technique in the preoperative evaluation of living renal donors is accurate even when images are read by multiple readers with varied levels of expertise.

AB - PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the accuracy of four-section multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of renal transplant donors when scans are read by one of multiple readers with varied levels of expertise, by using surgery as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Informed consent was waived. Between October 1999 and March 2003, 94 renal donors (42 men, 52 women; mean age, 44 years) underwent four-section multi-detector row CT. Unenhanced scanning of the abdomen was performed with 5-mm section thickness and table speed of 15 mm per rotation. Next, 135-150 mL of nonionic iodinated (300 mg/mL) contrast material was injected intravenously at a rate of 4-5 mL/sec. Contrast material-enhanced CT was initiated 20-25 seconds, 65-70 seconds, and 10 minutes after start of injection. Arterial phase scanning was performed with 1.25-mm section thickness and 7.5-mm table speed. Venous and excretory phase scanning was performed with 2.5-mm section thickness and 15-mm table speed. Each scan was evaluated independently by one of 11 readers for renal vascular and ureteral anatomic variants. Findings at CT were compared with those at surgery. Sensitivity and specificity (with 95% confidence intervals) and accuracy of CT were calculated on the basis of presence or absence of variant anatomy at surgery. RESULTS: CT depicted 107 of 114 renal arteries confirmed at surgery; seven accessory arteries were missed in six donor kidneys. CT depicted 95 of 98 renal veins confirmed at surgery. Sensitivity and specificity of CT were 66% and 100%, 75% and 100%, and 50% and 100%, and overall accuracy was 94%, 97%, and 99%, for identification of variant anatomy of renal arteries, veins, and ureters, respectively. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT as the sole imaging technique in the preoperative evaluation of living renal donors is accurate even when images are read by multiple readers with varied levels of expertise.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18844461270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18844461270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2353040496

DO - 10.1148/radiol.2353040496

M3 - Article

C2 - 15833989

AN - SCOPUS:18844461270

VL - 235

SP - 905

EP - 910

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 3

ER -