Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations

James R. Korndorffer, John L. Clayton, Seifu T. Tesfay, William C. Brunner, Rafael Sierra, J. Bruce Dunne, Daniel B. Jones, Robert V Rege, Cheri L. Touchard, Daniel J Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The "Southwestern" videotrainer stations have demonstrated concurrent validity (transferability to the operating room). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Southwestern stations for construct validity (the ability to discriminate between subjects at different levels of experience). Materials and methods. From two surgical training programs, Institutional Review Board approved protocol data were collected from 142 subjects, including novice (medical students and R1, n = 66), intermediate (R2-R4, n = 67), and advanced (R5 and expert surgeons, n = 9) groups. All participants performed three repetitions on each of five stations. Completion time was scored for each task. Laparoscopic experience was determined from residency case log databases and from expert surgeon personal case logs. Results for the three groups were compared using one-way ANOVA, including relevant pair-wise comparisons. Correlations between number of laparoscopic cases performed and task scores were determined by Pearson's and Spearman's rho-correlation coefficients. Results. The mean number of laparoscopic cases performed prior to completing the five tasks was 0 for novices, 9 for intermediates, and 431 for the advanced group. Significant differences (P < 0.001) were noted between groups for all five tasks and composite score. Task scores and composite scores significantly correlated with laparoscopic experience (P < 0.01). Conclusion. These data suggest that differences in laparoscopic ability are detected by performance on the videotrainer; thus, construct validity is demonstrated. Moreover, scores accurately reflect laparoscopic experience. Further validation may allow such simulators to be used for testing and credentialing purposes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)114-119
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume128
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005

Fingerprint

Credentialing
Research Ethics Committees
Operating Rooms
Internship and Residency
Medical Students
Analysis of Variance
Databases
Education
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic skills training
  • Laparoscopy
  • Simulator
  • Surgical education
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Korndorffer, J. R., Clayton, J. L., Tesfay, S. T., Brunner, W. C., Sierra, R., Dunne, J. B., ... Scott, D. J. (2005). Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations. Journal of Surgical Research, 128(1), 114-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.03.014

Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations. / Korndorffer, James R.; Clayton, John L.; Tesfay, Seifu T.; Brunner, William C.; Sierra, Rafael; Dunne, J. Bruce; Jones, Daniel B.; Rege, Robert V; Touchard, Cheri L.; Scott, Daniel J.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 128, No. 1, 09.2005, p. 114-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Korndorffer, JR, Clayton, JL, Tesfay, ST, Brunner, WC, Sierra, R, Dunne, JB, Jones, DB, Rege, RV, Touchard, CL & Scott, DJ 2005, 'Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations', Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 114-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.03.014
Korndorffer JR, Clayton JL, Tesfay ST, Brunner WC, Sierra R, Dunne JB et al. Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations. Journal of Surgical Research. 2005 Sep;128(1):114-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.03.014
Korndorffer, James R. ; Clayton, John L. ; Tesfay, Seifu T. ; Brunner, William C. ; Sierra, Rafael ; Dunne, J. Bruce ; Jones, Daniel B. ; Rege, Robert V ; Touchard, Cheri L. ; Scott, Daniel J. / Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2005 ; Vol. 128, No. 1. pp. 114-119.
@article{28b8acb49a38469b8e26da0f64a37c0b,
title = "Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations",
abstract = "Background. The {"}Southwestern{"} videotrainer stations have demonstrated concurrent validity (transferability to the operating room). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Southwestern stations for construct validity (the ability to discriminate between subjects at different levels of experience). Materials and methods. From two surgical training programs, Institutional Review Board approved protocol data were collected from 142 subjects, including novice (medical students and R1, n = 66), intermediate (R2-R4, n = 67), and advanced (R5 and expert surgeons, n = 9) groups. All participants performed three repetitions on each of five stations. Completion time was scored for each task. Laparoscopic experience was determined from residency case log databases and from expert surgeon personal case logs. Results for the three groups were compared using one-way ANOVA, including relevant pair-wise comparisons. Correlations between number of laparoscopic cases performed and task scores were determined by Pearson's and Spearman's rho-correlation coefficients. Results. The mean number of laparoscopic cases performed prior to completing the five tasks was 0 for novices, 9 for intermediates, and 431 for the advanced group. Significant differences (P < 0.001) were noted between groups for all five tasks and composite score. Task scores and composite scores significantly correlated with laparoscopic experience (P < 0.01). Conclusion. These data suggest that differences in laparoscopic ability are detected by performance on the videotrainer; thus, construct validity is demonstrated. Moreover, scores accurately reflect laparoscopic experience. Further validation may allow such simulators to be used for testing and credentialing purposes.",
keywords = "Laparoscopic skills training, Laparoscopy, Simulator, Surgical education, Validity",
author = "Korndorffer, {James R.} and Clayton, {John L.} and Tesfay, {Seifu T.} and Brunner, {William C.} and Rafael Sierra and Dunne, {J. Bruce} and Jones, {Daniel B.} and Rege, {Robert V} and Touchard, {Cheri L.} and Scott, {Daniel J}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2005.03.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "128",
pages = "114--119",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations

AU - Korndorffer, James R.

AU - Clayton, John L.

AU - Tesfay, Seifu T.

AU - Brunner, William C.

AU - Sierra, Rafael

AU - Dunne, J. Bruce

AU - Jones, Daniel B.

AU - Rege, Robert V

AU - Touchard, Cheri L.

AU - Scott, Daniel J

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Background. The "Southwestern" videotrainer stations have demonstrated concurrent validity (transferability to the operating room). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Southwestern stations for construct validity (the ability to discriminate between subjects at different levels of experience). Materials and methods. From two surgical training programs, Institutional Review Board approved protocol data were collected from 142 subjects, including novice (medical students and R1, n = 66), intermediate (R2-R4, n = 67), and advanced (R5 and expert surgeons, n = 9) groups. All participants performed three repetitions on each of five stations. Completion time was scored for each task. Laparoscopic experience was determined from residency case log databases and from expert surgeon personal case logs. Results for the three groups were compared using one-way ANOVA, including relevant pair-wise comparisons. Correlations between number of laparoscopic cases performed and task scores were determined by Pearson's and Spearman's rho-correlation coefficients. Results. The mean number of laparoscopic cases performed prior to completing the five tasks was 0 for novices, 9 for intermediates, and 431 for the advanced group. Significant differences (P < 0.001) were noted between groups for all five tasks and composite score. Task scores and composite scores significantly correlated with laparoscopic experience (P < 0.01). Conclusion. These data suggest that differences in laparoscopic ability are detected by performance on the videotrainer; thus, construct validity is demonstrated. Moreover, scores accurately reflect laparoscopic experience. Further validation may allow such simulators to be used for testing and credentialing purposes.

AB - Background. The "Southwestern" videotrainer stations have demonstrated concurrent validity (transferability to the operating room). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Southwestern stations for construct validity (the ability to discriminate between subjects at different levels of experience). Materials and methods. From two surgical training programs, Institutional Review Board approved protocol data were collected from 142 subjects, including novice (medical students and R1, n = 66), intermediate (R2-R4, n = 67), and advanced (R5 and expert surgeons, n = 9) groups. All participants performed three repetitions on each of five stations. Completion time was scored for each task. Laparoscopic experience was determined from residency case log databases and from expert surgeon personal case logs. Results for the three groups were compared using one-way ANOVA, including relevant pair-wise comparisons. Correlations between number of laparoscopic cases performed and task scores were determined by Pearson's and Spearman's rho-correlation coefficients. Results. The mean number of laparoscopic cases performed prior to completing the five tasks was 0 for novices, 9 for intermediates, and 431 for the advanced group. Significant differences (P < 0.001) were noted between groups for all five tasks and composite score. Task scores and composite scores significantly correlated with laparoscopic experience (P < 0.01). Conclusion. These data suggest that differences in laparoscopic ability are detected by performance on the videotrainer; thus, construct validity is demonstrated. Moreover, scores accurately reflect laparoscopic experience. Further validation may allow such simulators to be used for testing and credentialing purposes.

KW - Laparoscopic skills training

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Simulator

KW - Surgical education

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23944456851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23944456851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2005.03.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2005.03.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 15916767

AN - SCOPUS:23944456851

VL - 128

SP - 114

EP - 119

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 1

ER -