National EMS research agenda

Michael R. Sayre, Lynn J. White, Lawrence H. Brown, Michael Armacost, J. Michael Dean, Scott B. Frame, Baxter Larmon, Susan MacLean, N. Clay Mann, Gregg Margolis, Isabelle Melese-d'Hospital, Keith Neely, Michael O'Keefe, Daniel W. Spaite, Susan D. McHenry, Timothy B. Davis, Elinor Walker, Jon R. Krohmer, Dede Gish Panjada, Jennifer Kimzey & 25 others Kenneth Williams, Jeffrey Susman, Andrew Pollak, Nate Kuppermann, Kurt Krumperman, Alan Katz, John W. Becher, Scott Frame, Richard Levinson, Jeff Plant, James M Atkins, Kathy Robinson, Cindy Doyle, John Sinclair, Lori Moore, Jay Scott, Judith A. Ruple, Richard Hunt, Todd Hatley, Kevin McGinnis, Don Wood, Howard Werman, Kenneth R. Knipper, Elizabeth Criss, Robert O'Connor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Now, more than ever before, the spirit of the emergency services professional is recognized by people everywhere. Individuals from every walk of life comprehend the reality of the job these professionals do each day. Placing the safety of others above their own is their acknowledged responsibility. Rescue and treatment of ill and injured patients are their purpose as well as their gratification. The men and women who provide prehospital care are well aware of the unpredictable nature of emergency medical services (EMS). Prehospital care is given when and where it is needed: in urban settings with vertical challenges and gridlock; in rural settings with limited access; in confined spaces; within entrapments; or simply in the street, exposed to the elements. Despite the challenges, EMS professionals rise to the occasion to do their best with the resources available. Despite more than 30 years of dedicated service by thousands of EMS professionals, academic researchers, and public policy makers, the nation's EMS system is treating victims of illness and injury with little or no evidence that the care they provide is optimal. A national investment in the EMS research infrastructure is necessary to overcome obstacles currently impeding the accumulation of essential evidence of the effectiveness of EMS practice. Funding is required to train new researchers and to help them establish their careers. Financial backing is needed to support the development of effective prehospital treatments for the diseases that drive the design of the EMS system, including injury and sudden cardiac arrest. Innovative strategies to make EMS research easier to accomplish in emergency situations must be implemented. Researchers must have access to patient outcome information in order to evaluate and improve prehospital care. New biomedical and technical advances must be evaluated using scientific methodology. Research is the key to maintaining focus on improving the overall health of the community in a competitive and cost-conscious health care market. Most importantly, research is essential to ensure that the best possible patient care is provided in the prehospital setting. The bravery and dedication of EMS professionals cannot be underestimated. Images of firefighters, EMS personnel, and others going into danger while others are evacuating will remain burned in our collective consciousness. These professionals deserve the benefit of research to assist them in providing the best possible care in the challenging circumstances they encounter. With this document, we are seeking support for elevating the science of EMS and prehospital care to the next level. It is essential that we examine innovative ways to deliver prehospital care. Strategies to protect the safety of both the patient and the public safety worker must be devised and tested. There are many questions that remain to be asked, many practices to be evaluated, and many procedures to be improved. Research is the key to obtaining the answers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume6
Issue number3 SUPPL.
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Biomedical Research
Research Personnel
Research
Emergencies
Confined Spaces
Firefighters
Safety
Health Care Sector
Sudden Cardiac Death
Wounds and Injuries
Anniversaries and Special Events
Public Policy
Patient Safety
Administrative Personnel
Consciousness
Patient Care
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Agenda
  • Emergency medical services
  • Prehospital care
  • Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Sayre, M. R., White, L. J., Brown, L. H., Armacost, M., Dean, J. M., Frame, S. B., ... O'Connor, R. (2002). National EMS research agenda. Prehospital Emergency Care, 6(3 SUPPL.).

National EMS research agenda. / Sayre, Michael R.; White, Lynn J.; Brown, Lawrence H.; Armacost, Michael; Dean, J. Michael; Frame, Scott B.; Larmon, Baxter; MacLean, Susan; Mann, N. Clay; Margolis, Gregg; Melese-d'Hospital, Isabelle; Neely, Keith; O'Keefe, Michael; Spaite, Daniel W.; McHenry, Susan D.; Davis, Timothy B.; Walker, Elinor; Krohmer, Jon R.; Panjada, Dede Gish; Kimzey, Jennifer; Williams, Kenneth; Susman, Jeffrey; Pollak, Andrew; Kuppermann, Nate; Krumperman, Kurt; Katz, Alan; Becher, John W.; Frame, Scott; Levinson, Richard; Plant, Jeff; Atkins, James M; Robinson, Kathy; Doyle, Cindy; Sinclair, John; Moore, Lori; Scott, Jay; Ruple, Judith A.; Hunt, Richard; Hatley, Todd; McGinnis, Kevin; Wood, Don; Werman, Howard; Knipper, Kenneth R.; Criss, Elizabeth; O'Connor, Robert.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 6, No. 3 SUPPL., 2002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sayre, MR, White, LJ, Brown, LH, Armacost, M, Dean, JM, Frame, SB, Larmon, B, MacLean, S, Mann, NC, Margolis, G, Melese-d'Hospital, I, Neely, K, O'Keefe, M, Spaite, DW, McHenry, SD, Davis, TB, Walker, E, Krohmer, JR, Panjada, DG, Kimzey, J, Williams, K, Susman, J, Pollak, A, Kuppermann, N, Krumperman, K, Katz, A, Becher, JW, Frame, S, Levinson, R, Plant, J, Atkins, JM, Robinson, K, Doyle, C, Sinclair, J, Moore, L, Scott, J, Ruple, JA, Hunt, R, Hatley, T, McGinnis, K, Wood, D, Werman, H, Knipper, KR, Criss, E & O'Connor, R 2002, 'National EMS research agenda', Prehospital Emergency Care, vol. 6, no. 3 SUPPL..
Sayre MR, White LJ, Brown LH, Armacost M, Dean JM, Frame SB et al. National EMS research agenda. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2002;6(3 SUPPL.).
Sayre, Michael R. ; White, Lynn J. ; Brown, Lawrence H. ; Armacost, Michael ; Dean, J. Michael ; Frame, Scott B. ; Larmon, Baxter ; MacLean, Susan ; Mann, N. Clay ; Margolis, Gregg ; Melese-d'Hospital, Isabelle ; Neely, Keith ; O'Keefe, Michael ; Spaite, Daniel W. ; McHenry, Susan D. ; Davis, Timothy B. ; Walker, Elinor ; Krohmer, Jon R. ; Panjada, Dede Gish ; Kimzey, Jennifer ; Williams, Kenneth ; Susman, Jeffrey ; Pollak, Andrew ; Kuppermann, Nate ; Krumperman, Kurt ; Katz, Alan ; Becher, John W. ; Frame, Scott ; Levinson, Richard ; Plant, Jeff ; Atkins, James M ; Robinson, Kathy ; Doyle, Cindy ; Sinclair, John ; Moore, Lori ; Scott, Jay ; Ruple, Judith A. ; Hunt, Richard ; Hatley, Todd ; McGinnis, Kevin ; Wood, Don ; Werman, Howard ; Knipper, Kenneth R. ; Criss, Elizabeth ; O'Connor, Robert. / National EMS research agenda. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2002 ; Vol. 6, No. 3 SUPPL.
@article{a4e1f7292fed4a39be33f7f1ba19281d,
title = "National EMS research agenda",
abstract = "Now, more than ever before, the spirit of the emergency services professional is recognized by people everywhere. Individuals from every walk of life comprehend the reality of the job these professionals do each day. Placing the safety of others above their own is their acknowledged responsibility. Rescue and treatment of ill and injured patients are their purpose as well as their gratification. The men and women who provide prehospital care are well aware of the unpredictable nature of emergency medical services (EMS). Prehospital care is given when and where it is needed: in urban settings with vertical challenges and gridlock; in rural settings with limited access; in confined spaces; within entrapments; or simply in the street, exposed to the elements. Despite the challenges, EMS professionals rise to the occasion to do their best with the resources available. Despite more than 30 years of dedicated service by thousands of EMS professionals, academic researchers, and public policy makers, the nation's EMS system is treating victims of illness and injury with little or no evidence that the care they provide is optimal. A national investment in the EMS research infrastructure is necessary to overcome obstacles currently impeding the accumulation of essential evidence of the effectiveness of EMS practice. Funding is required to train new researchers and to help them establish their careers. Financial backing is needed to support the development of effective prehospital treatments for the diseases that drive the design of the EMS system, including injury and sudden cardiac arrest. Innovative strategies to make EMS research easier to accomplish in emergency situations must be implemented. Researchers must have access to patient outcome information in order to evaluate and improve prehospital care. New biomedical and technical advances must be evaluated using scientific methodology. Research is the key to maintaining focus on improving the overall health of the community in a competitive and cost-conscious health care market. Most importantly, research is essential to ensure that the best possible patient care is provided in the prehospital setting. The bravery and dedication of EMS professionals cannot be underestimated. Images of firefighters, EMS personnel, and others going into danger while others are evacuating will remain burned in our collective consciousness. These professionals deserve the benefit of research to assist them in providing the best possible care in the challenging circumstances they encounter. With this document, we are seeking support for elevating the science of EMS and prehospital care to the next level. It is essential that we examine innovative ways to deliver prehospital care. Strategies to protect the safety of both the patient and the public safety worker must be devised and tested. There are many questions that remain to be asked, many practices to be evaluated, and many procedures to be improved. Research is the key to obtaining the answers.",
keywords = "Agenda, Emergency medical services, Prehospital care, Research",
author = "Sayre, {Michael R.} and White, {Lynn J.} and Brown, {Lawrence H.} and Michael Armacost and Dean, {J. Michael} and Frame, {Scott B.} and Baxter Larmon and Susan MacLean and Mann, {N. Clay} and Gregg Margolis and Isabelle Melese-d'Hospital and Keith Neely and Michael O'Keefe and Spaite, {Daniel W.} and McHenry, {Susan D.} and Davis, {Timothy B.} and Elinor Walker and Krohmer, {Jon R.} and Panjada, {Dede Gish} and Jennifer Kimzey and Kenneth Williams and Jeffrey Susman and Andrew Pollak and Nate Kuppermann and Kurt Krumperman and Alan Katz and Becher, {John W.} and Scott Frame and Richard Levinson and Jeff Plant and Atkins, {James M} and Kathy Robinson and Cindy Doyle and John Sinclair and Lori Moore and Jay Scott and Ruple, {Judith A.} and Richard Hunt and Todd Hatley and Kevin McGinnis and Don Wood and Howard Werman and Knipper, {Kenneth R.} and Elizabeth Criss and Robert O'Connor",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - National EMS research agenda

AU - Sayre, Michael R.

AU - White, Lynn J.

AU - Brown, Lawrence H.

AU - Armacost, Michael

AU - Dean, J. Michael

AU - Frame, Scott B.

AU - Larmon, Baxter

AU - MacLean, Susan

AU - Mann, N. Clay

AU - Margolis, Gregg

AU - Melese-d'Hospital, Isabelle

AU - Neely, Keith

AU - O'Keefe, Michael

AU - Spaite, Daniel W.

AU - McHenry, Susan D.

AU - Davis, Timothy B.

AU - Walker, Elinor

AU - Krohmer, Jon R.

AU - Panjada, Dede Gish

AU - Kimzey, Jennifer

AU - Williams, Kenneth

AU - Susman, Jeffrey

AU - Pollak, Andrew

AU - Kuppermann, Nate

AU - Krumperman, Kurt

AU - Katz, Alan

AU - Becher, John W.

AU - Frame, Scott

AU - Levinson, Richard

AU - Plant, Jeff

AU - Atkins, James M

AU - Robinson, Kathy

AU - Doyle, Cindy

AU - Sinclair, John

AU - Moore, Lori

AU - Scott, Jay

AU - Ruple, Judith A.

AU - Hunt, Richard

AU - Hatley, Todd

AU - McGinnis, Kevin

AU - Wood, Don

AU - Werman, Howard

AU - Knipper, Kenneth R.

AU - Criss, Elizabeth

AU - O'Connor, Robert

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Now, more than ever before, the spirit of the emergency services professional is recognized by people everywhere. Individuals from every walk of life comprehend the reality of the job these professionals do each day. Placing the safety of others above their own is their acknowledged responsibility. Rescue and treatment of ill and injured patients are their purpose as well as their gratification. The men and women who provide prehospital care are well aware of the unpredictable nature of emergency medical services (EMS). Prehospital care is given when and where it is needed: in urban settings with vertical challenges and gridlock; in rural settings with limited access; in confined spaces; within entrapments; or simply in the street, exposed to the elements. Despite the challenges, EMS professionals rise to the occasion to do their best with the resources available. Despite more than 30 years of dedicated service by thousands of EMS professionals, academic researchers, and public policy makers, the nation's EMS system is treating victims of illness and injury with little or no evidence that the care they provide is optimal. A national investment in the EMS research infrastructure is necessary to overcome obstacles currently impeding the accumulation of essential evidence of the effectiveness of EMS practice. Funding is required to train new researchers and to help them establish their careers. Financial backing is needed to support the development of effective prehospital treatments for the diseases that drive the design of the EMS system, including injury and sudden cardiac arrest. Innovative strategies to make EMS research easier to accomplish in emergency situations must be implemented. Researchers must have access to patient outcome information in order to evaluate and improve prehospital care. New biomedical and technical advances must be evaluated using scientific methodology. Research is the key to maintaining focus on improving the overall health of the community in a competitive and cost-conscious health care market. Most importantly, research is essential to ensure that the best possible patient care is provided in the prehospital setting. The bravery and dedication of EMS professionals cannot be underestimated. Images of firefighters, EMS personnel, and others going into danger while others are evacuating will remain burned in our collective consciousness. These professionals deserve the benefit of research to assist them in providing the best possible care in the challenging circumstances they encounter. With this document, we are seeking support for elevating the science of EMS and prehospital care to the next level. It is essential that we examine innovative ways to deliver prehospital care. Strategies to protect the safety of both the patient and the public safety worker must be devised and tested. There are many questions that remain to be asked, many practices to be evaluated, and many procedures to be improved. Research is the key to obtaining the answers.

AB - Now, more than ever before, the spirit of the emergency services professional is recognized by people everywhere. Individuals from every walk of life comprehend the reality of the job these professionals do each day. Placing the safety of others above their own is their acknowledged responsibility. Rescue and treatment of ill and injured patients are their purpose as well as their gratification. The men and women who provide prehospital care are well aware of the unpredictable nature of emergency medical services (EMS). Prehospital care is given when and where it is needed: in urban settings with vertical challenges and gridlock; in rural settings with limited access; in confined spaces; within entrapments; or simply in the street, exposed to the elements. Despite the challenges, EMS professionals rise to the occasion to do their best with the resources available. Despite more than 30 years of dedicated service by thousands of EMS professionals, academic researchers, and public policy makers, the nation's EMS system is treating victims of illness and injury with little or no evidence that the care they provide is optimal. A national investment in the EMS research infrastructure is necessary to overcome obstacles currently impeding the accumulation of essential evidence of the effectiveness of EMS practice. Funding is required to train new researchers and to help them establish their careers. Financial backing is needed to support the development of effective prehospital treatments for the diseases that drive the design of the EMS system, including injury and sudden cardiac arrest. Innovative strategies to make EMS research easier to accomplish in emergency situations must be implemented. Researchers must have access to patient outcome information in order to evaluate and improve prehospital care. New biomedical and technical advances must be evaluated using scientific methodology. Research is the key to maintaining focus on improving the overall health of the community in a competitive and cost-conscious health care market. Most importantly, research is essential to ensure that the best possible patient care is provided in the prehospital setting. The bravery and dedication of EMS professionals cannot be underestimated. Images of firefighters, EMS personnel, and others going into danger while others are evacuating will remain burned in our collective consciousness. These professionals deserve the benefit of research to assist them in providing the best possible care in the challenging circumstances they encounter. With this document, we are seeking support for elevating the science of EMS and prehospital care to the next level. It is essential that we examine innovative ways to deliver prehospital care. Strategies to protect the safety of both the patient and the public safety worker must be devised and tested. There are many questions that remain to be asked, many practices to be evaluated, and many procedures to be improved. Research is the key to obtaining the answers.

KW - Agenda

KW - Emergency medical services

KW - Prehospital care

KW - Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19244367890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19244367890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 3 SUPPL.

ER -