No catheter angiography is needed in patients with an obscure acute gastrointestinal bleed and negative CTA

Pratik A. Shukla, Adam Zybulewski, Marcin K. Kolber, Erik Berkowitz, James Silberzweig, Morris Hayim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the negative predictive power of computed tomography angiography (CTA) for the identification of obscure acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (GI bleeding not visualized/treated by endoscopy) on subsequent mesenteric angiography (MA) with the intention to treat. Materials and methods A retrospective chart review of patients was performed who underwent mesenteric angiography for the evaluation/treatment of acute GI bleeding between November 2012 and July 2016. Patients with negative CTA examinations that proceeded to MA were identified. Negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated. Results 20 patients (14 male, 6 female; average age: 73.1 ± 12.8 years) underwent 20 negative CTA examinations for the evaluation and treatment of GI bleeding followed by mesenteric angiography. Eighteen of 20 patients had negative subsequent MA (negative predictive value, NPV = 90%). Both false negative cases were upper GI bleed (vs 0 lower GI bleed); this difference was significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions The high NPV of CTA for the evaluation of GI bleeding suggests utility for excluding patients that are unlikely to benefit from MA and subsequent endovascular therapy. CTA may be considered for the first line diagnostic study for the evaluation of obscure GI bleeding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)106-109
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Imaging
Volume43
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Angiography
Catheters
Hemorrhage
Endoscopy
Computed Tomography Angiography
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Computed tomography angiography (CTA)
  • False negative
  • Intention to treat
  • Mesenteric angiography
  • Negative predictive value
  • Obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

No catheter angiography is needed in patients with an obscure acute gastrointestinal bleed and negative CTA. / Shukla, Pratik A.; Zybulewski, Adam; Kolber, Marcin K.; Berkowitz, Erik; Silberzweig, James; Hayim, Morris.

In: Clinical Imaging, Vol. 43, 01.05.2017, p. 106-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shukla, Pratik A. ; Zybulewski, Adam ; Kolber, Marcin K. ; Berkowitz, Erik ; Silberzweig, James ; Hayim, Morris. / No catheter angiography is needed in patients with an obscure acute gastrointestinal bleed and negative CTA. In: Clinical Imaging. 2017 ; Vol. 43. pp. 106-109.
@article{0d0f44fd2e8e40d7ae974ec688ab55e0,
title = "No catheter angiography is needed in patients with an obscure acute gastrointestinal bleed and negative CTA",
abstract = "Purpose To evaluate the negative predictive power of computed tomography angiography (CTA) for the identification of obscure acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (GI bleeding not visualized/treated by endoscopy) on subsequent mesenteric angiography (MA) with the intention to treat. Materials and methods A retrospective chart review of patients was performed who underwent mesenteric angiography for the evaluation/treatment of acute GI bleeding between November 2012 and July 2016. Patients with negative CTA examinations that proceeded to MA were identified. Negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated. Results 20 patients (14 male, 6 female; average age: 73.1 ± 12.8 years) underwent 20 negative CTA examinations for the evaluation and treatment of GI bleeding followed by mesenteric angiography. Eighteen of 20 patients had negative subsequent MA (negative predictive value, NPV = 90{\%}). Both false negative cases were upper GI bleed (vs 0 lower GI bleed); this difference was significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions The high NPV of CTA for the evaluation of GI bleeding suggests utility for excluding patients that are unlikely to benefit from MA and subsequent endovascular therapy. CTA may be considered for the first line diagnostic study for the evaluation of obscure GI bleeding.",
keywords = "Computed tomography angiography (CTA), False negative, Intention to treat, Mesenteric angiography, Negative predictive value, Obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding",
author = "Shukla, {Pratik A.} and Adam Zybulewski and Kolber, {Marcin K.} and Erik Berkowitz and James Silberzweig and Morris Hayim",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.02.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "106--109",
journal = "Clinical Imaging",
issn = "0899-7071",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - No catheter angiography is needed in patients with an obscure acute gastrointestinal bleed and negative CTA

AU - Shukla, Pratik A.

AU - Zybulewski, Adam

AU - Kolber, Marcin K.

AU - Berkowitz, Erik

AU - Silberzweig, James

AU - Hayim, Morris

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Purpose To evaluate the negative predictive power of computed tomography angiography (CTA) for the identification of obscure acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (GI bleeding not visualized/treated by endoscopy) on subsequent mesenteric angiography (MA) with the intention to treat. Materials and methods A retrospective chart review of patients was performed who underwent mesenteric angiography for the evaluation/treatment of acute GI bleeding between November 2012 and July 2016. Patients with negative CTA examinations that proceeded to MA were identified. Negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated. Results 20 patients (14 male, 6 female; average age: 73.1 ± 12.8 years) underwent 20 negative CTA examinations for the evaluation and treatment of GI bleeding followed by mesenteric angiography. Eighteen of 20 patients had negative subsequent MA (negative predictive value, NPV = 90%). Both false negative cases were upper GI bleed (vs 0 lower GI bleed); this difference was significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions The high NPV of CTA for the evaluation of GI bleeding suggests utility for excluding patients that are unlikely to benefit from MA and subsequent endovascular therapy. CTA may be considered for the first line diagnostic study for the evaluation of obscure GI bleeding.

AB - Purpose To evaluate the negative predictive power of computed tomography angiography (CTA) for the identification of obscure acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (GI bleeding not visualized/treated by endoscopy) on subsequent mesenteric angiography (MA) with the intention to treat. Materials and methods A retrospective chart review of patients was performed who underwent mesenteric angiography for the evaluation/treatment of acute GI bleeding between November 2012 and July 2016. Patients with negative CTA examinations that proceeded to MA were identified. Negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated. Results 20 patients (14 male, 6 female; average age: 73.1 ± 12.8 years) underwent 20 negative CTA examinations for the evaluation and treatment of GI bleeding followed by mesenteric angiography. Eighteen of 20 patients had negative subsequent MA (negative predictive value, NPV = 90%). Both false negative cases were upper GI bleed (vs 0 lower GI bleed); this difference was significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions The high NPV of CTA for the evaluation of GI bleeding suggests utility for excluding patients that are unlikely to benefit from MA and subsequent endovascular therapy. CTA may be considered for the first line diagnostic study for the evaluation of obscure GI bleeding.

KW - Computed tomography angiography (CTA)

KW - False negative

KW - Intention to treat

KW - Mesenteric angiography

KW - Negative predictive value

KW - Obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014437083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014437083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.02.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 28278445

AN - SCOPUS:85014437083

VL - 43

SP - 106

EP - 109

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

SN - 0899-7071

ER -