Nominal group technique: A brainstorming tool for identifying areas to improve pain management in hospitalized patients

Adolfo Peña, Carlos A. Estrada, Debbie Soniat, Benjamin Taylor, Michael Burton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Pain management in hospitalized patients remains a priority area for improvement; effective strategies for consensus development are needed to prioritize interventions. Objective: To identify challenges, barriers, and perspectives of healthcare providers in managing pain among hospitalized patients. Design: Qualitative and quantitative group consensus using a brainstorming technique for quality improvement-the nominal group technique (NGT). Setting: One medical, 1 medical-surgical, and 1 surgical hospital unit at a large academic medical center. Participants: Nurses, resident physicians, patient care technicians, and unit clerks. MEASUREMENTS: Responses and ranking to the NGT question: "What causes uncontrolled pain in your unit?" Results: Twenty-seven health workers generated a total of 94 ideas. The ideas perceived contributing to a suboptimal pain control were grouped as system factors (timeliness, n = 18 ideas; communication, n = 11; pain assessment, n = 8), human factors (knowledge and experience, n = 16; provider bias, n = 8; patient factors, n = 19), and interface of system and human factors (standardization, n = 14). Knowledge, timeliness, provider bias, and patient factors were the top ranked themes. Conclusions: Knowledge and timeliness are considered main priorities to improve pain control. NGT is an efficient tool for identifying general and context-specific priority areas for quality improvement; teams of healthcare providers should consider using NGT to address their own challenges and barriers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)416-420
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Hospital Medicine
Volume7
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Pain Management
Pain
Quality Improvement
Health Personnel
Consensus
Hospital Units
Pain Measurement
Patient Care
Nurses
Communication
Physicians
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Assessment and Diagnosis
  • Care Planning
  • Fundamentals and skills
  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

Nominal group technique : A brainstorming tool for identifying areas to improve pain management in hospitalized patients. / Peña, Adolfo; Estrada, Carlos A.; Soniat, Debbie; Taylor, Benjamin; Burton, Michael.

In: Journal of Hospital Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 5, 05.2012, p. 416-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Peña, Adolfo ; Estrada, Carlos A. ; Soniat, Debbie ; Taylor, Benjamin ; Burton, Michael. / Nominal group technique : A brainstorming tool for identifying areas to improve pain management in hospitalized patients. In: Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 5. pp. 416-420.
@article{1189947cd0d6475792742a15c4d3677e,
title = "Nominal group technique: A brainstorming tool for identifying areas to improve pain management in hospitalized patients",
abstract = "Background: Pain management in hospitalized patients remains a priority area for improvement; effective strategies for consensus development are needed to prioritize interventions. Objective: To identify challenges, barriers, and perspectives of healthcare providers in managing pain among hospitalized patients. Design: Qualitative and quantitative group consensus using a brainstorming technique for quality improvement-the nominal group technique (NGT). Setting: One medical, 1 medical-surgical, and 1 surgical hospital unit at a large academic medical center. Participants: Nurses, resident physicians, patient care technicians, and unit clerks. MEASUREMENTS: Responses and ranking to the NGT question: {"}What causes uncontrolled pain in your unit?{"} Results: Twenty-seven health workers generated a total of 94 ideas. The ideas perceived contributing to a suboptimal pain control were grouped as system factors (timeliness, n = 18 ideas; communication, n = 11; pain assessment, n = 8), human factors (knowledge and experience, n = 16; provider bias, n = 8; patient factors, n = 19), and interface of system and human factors (standardization, n = 14). Knowledge, timeliness, provider bias, and patient factors were the top ranked themes. Conclusions: Knowledge and timeliness are considered main priorities to improve pain control. NGT is an efficient tool for identifying general and context-specific priority areas for quality improvement; teams of healthcare providers should consider using NGT to address their own challenges and barriers.",
author = "Adolfo Pe{\~n}a and Estrada, {Carlos A.} and Debbie Soniat and Benjamin Taylor and Michael Burton",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/jhm.1900",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "416--420",
journal = "Journal of hospital medicine (Online)",
issn = "1553-5606",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nominal group technique

T2 - A brainstorming tool for identifying areas to improve pain management in hospitalized patients

AU - Peña, Adolfo

AU - Estrada, Carlos A.

AU - Soniat, Debbie

AU - Taylor, Benjamin

AU - Burton, Michael

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Background: Pain management in hospitalized patients remains a priority area for improvement; effective strategies for consensus development are needed to prioritize interventions. Objective: To identify challenges, barriers, and perspectives of healthcare providers in managing pain among hospitalized patients. Design: Qualitative and quantitative group consensus using a brainstorming technique for quality improvement-the nominal group technique (NGT). Setting: One medical, 1 medical-surgical, and 1 surgical hospital unit at a large academic medical center. Participants: Nurses, resident physicians, patient care technicians, and unit clerks. MEASUREMENTS: Responses and ranking to the NGT question: "What causes uncontrolled pain in your unit?" Results: Twenty-seven health workers generated a total of 94 ideas. The ideas perceived contributing to a suboptimal pain control were grouped as system factors (timeliness, n = 18 ideas; communication, n = 11; pain assessment, n = 8), human factors (knowledge and experience, n = 16; provider bias, n = 8; patient factors, n = 19), and interface of system and human factors (standardization, n = 14). Knowledge, timeliness, provider bias, and patient factors were the top ranked themes. Conclusions: Knowledge and timeliness are considered main priorities to improve pain control. NGT is an efficient tool for identifying general and context-specific priority areas for quality improvement; teams of healthcare providers should consider using NGT to address their own challenges and barriers.

AB - Background: Pain management in hospitalized patients remains a priority area for improvement; effective strategies for consensus development are needed to prioritize interventions. Objective: To identify challenges, barriers, and perspectives of healthcare providers in managing pain among hospitalized patients. Design: Qualitative and quantitative group consensus using a brainstorming technique for quality improvement-the nominal group technique (NGT). Setting: One medical, 1 medical-surgical, and 1 surgical hospital unit at a large academic medical center. Participants: Nurses, resident physicians, patient care technicians, and unit clerks. MEASUREMENTS: Responses and ranking to the NGT question: "What causes uncontrolled pain in your unit?" Results: Twenty-seven health workers generated a total of 94 ideas. The ideas perceived contributing to a suboptimal pain control were grouped as system factors (timeliness, n = 18 ideas; communication, n = 11; pain assessment, n = 8), human factors (knowledge and experience, n = 16; provider bias, n = 8; patient factors, n = 19), and interface of system and human factors (standardization, n = 14). Knowledge, timeliness, provider bias, and patient factors were the top ranked themes. Conclusions: Knowledge and timeliness are considered main priorities to improve pain control. NGT is an efficient tool for identifying general and context-specific priority areas for quality improvement; teams of healthcare providers should consider using NGT to address their own challenges and barriers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861961707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861961707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jhm.1900

DO - 10.1002/jhm.1900

M3 - Article

C2 - 22190453

AN - SCOPUS:84861961707

VL - 7

SP - 416

EP - 420

JO - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

JF - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

SN - 1553-5606

IS - 5

ER -