Nomograms for Bladder Cancer

Shahrokh F. Shariat, Vitaly Margulis, Yair Lotan, Francesco Montorsi, Pierre I. Karakiewicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with bladder cancer face a variable risk of recurrence based on their clinical characteristics and the biology of their disease. Physicians need tools to accurately estimate the risk of recurrence and cancer-specific mortality to recommend individualized therapy and to design appropriate clinical trials. Methods: A MEDLINE literature search was performed on bladder cancer nomograms from January 1966 to July 2007. We recorded input variables, prediction form, number of patients used to develop the prediction tools, the outcome being predicted, prediction tool-specific features, predictive accuracy, and whether validation was performed. Each prediction tool was classified into patient clinical disease state and the outcome being predicted. Results: The literature search generated 11 published prediction tools that may be applied to patients in various clinical stages of bladder cancer. Of the 11 prediction tools, 8 have undergone validation. The following considerations need to be applied when designing and judging predictive models: predictive accuracy (internal and external validation), calibration, generalizability (reproducibility and transportability), and level of complexity, with the intent of determining whether the new model offers advantages relative to available alternatives. Studies comparing decision tools show that nomograms outperform other methodologies such as risk grouping. Conclusions: Nomograms provide the most accurate individualized risk estimations that facilitate management decisions. However, current nomograms still need to be refined. Potential advances may include the incorporation of biomarkers, validation in larger patient cohorts, and prospective data acquisition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-53
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008

Fingerprint

Nomograms
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Recurrence
MEDLINE
Calibration
Biomarkers
Clinical Trials
Physicians
Mortality
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Bladder cancer
  • Nomogram
  • Prediction
  • Prognosis
  • Risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Shariat, S. F., Margulis, V., Lotan, Y., Montorsi, F., & Karakiewicz, P. I. (2008). Nomograms for Bladder Cancer. European Urology, 54(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.004

Nomograms for Bladder Cancer. / Shariat, Shahrokh F.; Margulis, Vitaly; Lotan, Yair; Montorsi, Francesco; Karakiewicz, Pierre I.

In: European Urology, Vol. 54, No. 1, 07.2008, p. 41-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shariat, SF, Margulis, V, Lotan, Y, Montorsi, F & Karakiewicz, PI 2008, 'Nomograms for Bladder Cancer', European Urology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.004
Shariat, Shahrokh F. ; Margulis, Vitaly ; Lotan, Yair ; Montorsi, Francesco ; Karakiewicz, Pierre I. / Nomograms for Bladder Cancer. In: European Urology. 2008 ; Vol. 54, No. 1. pp. 41-53.
@article{7067ee025ae448f1baa583d529f91928,
title = "Nomograms for Bladder Cancer",
abstract = "Introduction: Patients with bladder cancer face a variable risk of recurrence based on their clinical characteristics and the biology of their disease. Physicians need tools to accurately estimate the risk of recurrence and cancer-specific mortality to recommend individualized therapy and to design appropriate clinical trials. Methods: A MEDLINE literature search was performed on bladder cancer nomograms from January 1966 to July 2007. We recorded input variables, prediction form, number of patients used to develop the prediction tools, the outcome being predicted, prediction tool-specific features, predictive accuracy, and whether validation was performed. Each prediction tool was classified into patient clinical disease state and the outcome being predicted. Results: The literature search generated 11 published prediction tools that may be applied to patients in various clinical stages of bladder cancer. Of the 11 prediction tools, 8 have undergone validation. The following considerations need to be applied when designing and judging predictive models: predictive accuracy (internal and external validation), calibration, generalizability (reproducibility and transportability), and level of complexity, with the intent of determining whether the new model offers advantages relative to available alternatives. Studies comparing decision tools show that nomograms outperform other methodologies such as risk grouping. Conclusions: Nomograms provide the most accurate individualized risk estimations that facilitate management decisions. However, current nomograms still need to be refined. Potential advances may include the incorporation of biomarkers, validation in larger patient cohorts, and prospective data acquisition.",
keywords = "Bladder cancer, Nomogram, Prediction, Prognosis, Risk",
author = "Shariat, {Shahrokh F.} and Vitaly Margulis and Yair Lotan and Francesco Montorsi and Karakiewicz, {Pierre I.}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "41--53",
journal = "European Urology",
issn = "0302-2838",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nomograms for Bladder Cancer

AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F.

AU - Margulis, Vitaly

AU - Lotan, Yair

AU - Montorsi, Francesco

AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I.

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - Introduction: Patients with bladder cancer face a variable risk of recurrence based on their clinical characteristics and the biology of their disease. Physicians need tools to accurately estimate the risk of recurrence and cancer-specific mortality to recommend individualized therapy and to design appropriate clinical trials. Methods: A MEDLINE literature search was performed on bladder cancer nomograms from January 1966 to July 2007. We recorded input variables, prediction form, number of patients used to develop the prediction tools, the outcome being predicted, prediction tool-specific features, predictive accuracy, and whether validation was performed. Each prediction tool was classified into patient clinical disease state and the outcome being predicted. Results: The literature search generated 11 published prediction tools that may be applied to patients in various clinical stages of bladder cancer. Of the 11 prediction tools, 8 have undergone validation. The following considerations need to be applied when designing and judging predictive models: predictive accuracy (internal and external validation), calibration, generalizability (reproducibility and transportability), and level of complexity, with the intent of determining whether the new model offers advantages relative to available alternatives. Studies comparing decision tools show that nomograms outperform other methodologies such as risk grouping. Conclusions: Nomograms provide the most accurate individualized risk estimations that facilitate management decisions. However, current nomograms still need to be refined. Potential advances may include the incorporation of biomarkers, validation in larger patient cohorts, and prospective data acquisition.

AB - Introduction: Patients with bladder cancer face a variable risk of recurrence based on their clinical characteristics and the biology of their disease. Physicians need tools to accurately estimate the risk of recurrence and cancer-specific mortality to recommend individualized therapy and to design appropriate clinical trials. Methods: A MEDLINE literature search was performed on bladder cancer nomograms from January 1966 to July 2007. We recorded input variables, prediction form, number of patients used to develop the prediction tools, the outcome being predicted, prediction tool-specific features, predictive accuracy, and whether validation was performed. Each prediction tool was classified into patient clinical disease state and the outcome being predicted. Results: The literature search generated 11 published prediction tools that may be applied to patients in various clinical stages of bladder cancer. Of the 11 prediction tools, 8 have undergone validation. The following considerations need to be applied when designing and judging predictive models: predictive accuracy (internal and external validation), calibration, generalizability (reproducibility and transportability), and level of complexity, with the intent of determining whether the new model offers advantages relative to available alternatives. Studies comparing decision tools show that nomograms outperform other methodologies such as risk grouping. Conclusions: Nomograms provide the most accurate individualized risk estimations that facilitate management decisions. However, current nomograms still need to be refined. Potential advances may include the incorporation of biomarkers, validation in larger patient cohorts, and prospective data acquisition.

KW - Bladder cancer

KW - Nomogram

KW - Prediction

KW - Prognosis

KW - Risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44149118662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44149118662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 18207314

AN - SCOPUS:44149118662

VL - 54

SP - 41

EP - 53

JO - European Urology

JF - European Urology

SN - 0302-2838

IS - 1

ER -