Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients who present during off hours have higher risk profiles and are treated less aggressively, but their outcomes are not worse: A report from can rapid risk stratification of unstable angina patients suppress adverse outcomes with early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines CRUSADE initiative

Charles V. Pollack, Judd E. Hollander, Anita Y. Chen, Eric D. Peterson, Sripal Bangalore, Frank W. Peacock, Christopher P. Cannon, John G. Canto, Brian W. Gibler, Magnus E. Ohman, Matthew T. Roe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Evidence-based guidelines call for advanced and definitive therapy for patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). It is not known whether these guidelines are follow more diligently when patients arrive in the ED during regular hours, during which hospital resources including cardiology consultation may be more readily available.To determine whether patients with NSTEMI who present to the ED outside of usual hours have prolonged times to advanced and definitive therapy and poorer short-term outcomes.We examined NSTEMI patients from the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress ADverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) national quality improvement initiative (January 2001-April 2003) and compared demographics, risk profiles, intensity of medical management, and timing and intensity of intervention by whether presentation occurred during usual or off hours.We analyzed 34,297 NSTEMI presentations; 15,090 (44%) occurred during usual hours; 19,207 (56%) occurred during off hours. Off-hours-presenting patients had generally higher cardiac risk and received initial ECGs more quickly than patients who presented during usual hours (median 15 minutes vs. 18 minutes, P < 0.0001), and received similar (although suboptimal) medical management. In contrast, those who presented during off hours were less likely to receive timely diagnostic angiography, PCI, and bypass surgery (cath: median 32.9 hours vs. 24.3 hours, P < 0.0001; PCI: 28.6 hours vs. 23.6 hours, P < 0.0001). Despite these differences, in-hospital outcomes were similar.Time of patient presentation has a modest impact on the timeliness of intervention in NSTEMI but was not associated with lower mortality. Although intensity of medical management was similar between groups, it was generally lower than current guidelines recommend, indicating potential for improvement in NSTEMI outcomes, regardless of time of presentation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-33
Number of pages5
JournalCritical pathways in cardiology
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CRUSADE
  • Day of week
  • NSTEMI
  • Time of day
  • Time to intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients who present during off hours have higher risk profiles and are treated less aggressively, but their outcomes are not worse: A report from can rapid risk stratification of unstable angina patients suppress adverse outcomes with early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines CRUSADE initiative'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this