Normative warrant in diagnostic criteria: The case of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders

John Z. Sadler, Bill Fulford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article focuses on the kinds of evaluative judgments made when applying DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria within the diagnostic interview between clinician and patient. The authors name these kinds of value judgments in diagnosis "normative warrant" because they involve one or more justifications (warrants) for standard-bearing (normative) elements involved in applying diagnostic criteria to actual patients. Seven types of normative warrant judgments are described (Type 1, Semantic-Phenomenal Matching; Type 2, Solicitation Choice; Type 3, Sociocultural Context; Type 4, Performance-Context Matching; Type 5, Deviance Threshold; Type 6, Threshold Characterization; Type 7, Disvalue characterization) and the typology is illustrated by applying it to various DSM-IV-TR personality disorder criteria. A research and clinical understanding of normative warrant may well contribute to the refinement of criteria sets as well as the refinement of the clinical use of criteria sets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)170-180
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Personality Disorders
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Personality Disorders
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Semantics
Names
Interviews
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Normative warrant in diagnostic criteria : The case of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders. / Sadler, John Z.; Fulford, Bill.

In: Journal of Personality Disorders, Vol. 20, No. 2, 04.2006, p. 170-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{37dbd1e824fb4c10b82eae6cfeea5f07,
title = "Normative warrant in diagnostic criteria: The case of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders",
abstract = "This article focuses on the kinds of evaluative judgments made when applying DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria within the diagnostic interview between clinician and patient. The authors name these kinds of value judgments in diagnosis {"}normative warrant{"} because they involve one or more justifications (warrants) for standard-bearing (normative) elements involved in applying diagnostic criteria to actual patients. Seven types of normative warrant judgments are described (Type 1, Semantic-Phenomenal Matching; Type 2, Solicitation Choice; Type 3, Sociocultural Context; Type 4, Performance-Context Matching; Type 5, Deviance Threshold; Type 6, Threshold Characterization; Type 7, Disvalue characterization) and the typology is illustrated by applying it to various DSM-IV-TR personality disorder criteria. A research and clinical understanding of normative warrant may well contribute to the refinement of criteria sets as well as the refinement of the clinical use of criteria sets.",
author = "Sadler, {John Z.} and Bill Fulford",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1521/pedi.2006.20.2.170",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "170--180",
journal = "Journal of Personality Disorders",
issn = "0885-579X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normative warrant in diagnostic criteria

T2 - The case of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders

AU - Sadler, John Z.

AU - Fulford, Bill

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - This article focuses on the kinds of evaluative judgments made when applying DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria within the diagnostic interview between clinician and patient. The authors name these kinds of value judgments in diagnosis "normative warrant" because they involve one or more justifications (warrants) for standard-bearing (normative) elements involved in applying diagnostic criteria to actual patients. Seven types of normative warrant judgments are described (Type 1, Semantic-Phenomenal Matching; Type 2, Solicitation Choice; Type 3, Sociocultural Context; Type 4, Performance-Context Matching; Type 5, Deviance Threshold; Type 6, Threshold Characterization; Type 7, Disvalue characterization) and the typology is illustrated by applying it to various DSM-IV-TR personality disorder criteria. A research and clinical understanding of normative warrant may well contribute to the refinement of criteria sets as well as the refinement of the clinical use of criteria sets.

AB - This article focuses on the kinds of evaluative judgments made when applying DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria within the diagnostic interview between clinician and patient. The authors name these kinds of value judgments in diagnosis "normative warrant" because they involve one or more justifications (warrants) for standard-bearing (normative) elements involved in applying diagnostic criteria to actual patients. Seven types of normative warrant judgments are described (Type 1, Semantic-Phenomenal Matching; Type 2, Solicitation Choice; Type 3, Sociocultural Context; Type 4, Performance-Context Matching; Type 5, Deviance Threshold; Type 6, Threshold Characterization; Type 7, Disvalue characterization) and the typology is illustrated by applying it to various DSM-IV-TR personality disorder criteria. A research and clinical understanding of normative warrant may well contribute to the refinement of criteria sets as well as the refinement of the clinical use of criteria sets.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646261137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646261137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/pedi.2006.20.2.170

DO - 10.1521/pedi.2006.20.2.170

M3 - Article

C2 - 16643120

AN - SCOPUS:33646261137

VL - 20

SP - 170

EP - 180

JO - Journal of Personality Disorders

JF - Journal of Personality Disorders

SN - 0885-579X

IS - 2

ER -