Nosocomial infections in surgical patients: Developing valid measures of intrinsic patient risk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For surgeons or hospitals to compare their rates of wound infection meaningfully, the analysis must first control for the mix of intrinsic infection risk of their patients. Research over the past century has led to the development of several intrinsic risk indexes that can be used to stratify the wound infection rates so that valid comparisons can be made within risk strata. For an intrinsic risk index to be useful for comparing rates, it must control for all of the important intrinsic risk constructs; merely being statistically associated with infection rates does not ensure that a risk index will be useful. Understanding how a risk index can be both parsimonious and comprehensive requires consideration of the competing principles of multicollinearity and orthogonality. Various techniques of multivariate analysis are used to develop multivariate risk indexes, but the success of the process depends on having all of the important orthogonal risk constructs represented in the pool of predictor variables available for the analysis, either directly by variables in the pool or by demonstrated multicollinearity. Despite recent advances in risk measurement, many important questions remain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalThe American journal of medicine
Volume91
Issue number3 SUPPL. 2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 16 1991

Fingerprint

Cross Infection
Wound Infection
Infection
Multivariate Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Nosocomial infections in surgical patients : Developing valid measures of intrinsic patient risk. / Haley, Robert W.

In: The American journal of medicine, Vol. 91, No. 3 SUPPL. 2, 16.09.1991.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{50c0f6f93f444e548abab11848548dd1,
title = "Nosocomial infections in surgical patients: Developing valid measures of intrinsic patient risk",
abstract = "For surgeons or hospitals to compare their rates of wound infection meaningfully, the analysis must first control for the mix of intrinsic infection risk of their patients. Research over the past century has led to the development of several intrinsic risk indexes that can be used to stratify the wound infection rates so that valid comparisons can be made within risk strata. For an intrinsic risk index to be useful for comparing rates, it must control for all of the important intrinsic risk constructs; merely being statistically associated with infection rates does not ensure that a risk index will be useful. Understanding how a risk index can be both parsimonious and comprehensive requires consideration of the competing principles of multicollinearity and orthogonality. Various techniques of multivariate analysis are used to develop multivariate risk indexes, but the success of the process depends on having all of the important orthogonal risk constructs represented in the pool of predictor variables available for the analysis, either directly by variables in the pool or by demonstrated multicollinearity. Despite recent advances in risk measurement, many important questions remain.",
author = "Haley, {Robert W.}",
year = "1991",
month = "9",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9343(91)90360-A",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
journal = "American Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0002-9343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3 SUPPL. 2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nosocomial infections in surgical patients

T2 - Developing valid measures of intrinsic patient risk

AU - Haley, Robert W.

PY - 1991/9/16

Y1 - 1991/9/16

N2 - For surgeons or hospitals to compare their rates of wound infection meaningfully, the analysis must first control for the mix of intrinsic infection risk of their patients. Research over the past century has led to the development of several intrinsic risk indexes that can be used to stratify the wound infection rates so that valid comparisons can be made within risk strata. For an intrinsic risk index to be useful for comparing rates, it must control for all of the important intrinsic risk constructs; merely being statistically associated with infection rates does not ensure that a risk index will be useful. Understanding how a risk index can be both parsimonious and comprehensive requires consideration of the competing principles of multicollinearity and orthogonality. Various techniques of multivariate analysis are used to develop multivariate risk indexes, but the success of the process depends on having all of the important orthogonal risk constructs represented in the pool of predictor variables available for the analysis, either directly by variables in the pool or by demonstrated multicollinearity. Despite recent advances in risk measurement, many important questions remain.

AB - For surgeons or hospitals to compare their rates of wound infection meaningfully, the analysis must first control for the mix of intrinsic infection risk of their patients. Research over the past century has led to the development of several intrinsic risk indexes that can be used to stratify the wound infection rates so that valid comparisons can be made within risk strata. For an intrinsic risk index to be useful for comparing rates, it must control for all of the important intrinsic risk constructs; merely being statistically associated with infection rates does not ensure that a risk index will be useful. Understanding how a risk index can be both parsimonious and comprehensive requires consideration of the competing principles of multicollinearity and orthogonality. Various techniques of multivariate analysis are used to develop multivariate risk indexes, but the success of the process depends on having all of the important orthogonal risk constructs represented in the pool of predictor variables available for the analysis, either directly by variables in the pool or by demonstrated multicollinearity. Despite recent advances in risk measurement, many important questions remain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14044254236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14044254236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90360-A

DO - 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90360-A

M3 - Article

C2 - 1928156

AN - SCOPUS:14044254236

VL - 91

JO - American Journal of Medicine

JF - American Journal of Medicine

SN - 0002-9343

IS - 3 SUPPL. 2

ER -