Novel measurement of relative aortic size predicts rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysms

Ryan R Davies, Amy Gallo, Michael A. Coady, George Tellides, Donald M. Botta, Brendan Burke, Marcus P. Coe, Gary S. Kopf, John A. Elefteriades

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

298 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Optimal operative decision making in thoracic aortic aneurysms requires accurate information on the risk of complications during expectant management. Cumulative and yearly risks of rupture, dissection, and death before operative repair increase with increasing aortic size, but previous work has not addressed the impact of relative aortic size on complication rates. Methods. Our institutional database contains data on 805 patients followed up serially with thoracic aortic aneurysms. Body surface area information was obtained on 410 patients (257 male, 153 female). We calculated a new measure of relative aortic size, the "aortic size index," and examined its ability to predict complications in these patients. Results. Increasing aortic size index was a significant predictor of increasing rates of rupture (p = 0.0014) as well as the combined endpoint of rupture, death, or dissection (p < 0.0001). Using aortic size index, patients were stratified into three risk groups: less than 2.75 cm/m2 are at low risk (approximately 4% per year), 2.75 to 4.24 cm/m2 are at moderate risk (approximately 8% per year), and those above 4.25 cm/m2 are at high risk (approximately 20% per year). Conclusions. This study confirms that (1) thoracic aortic aneurysm is a lethal disease, (2) relative aortic size is more important than absolute aortic size in predicting complications, and (3) a novel measurement of relative aortic size allows for the stratification of patients into three levels of risk, enabling appropriate surgical decision-making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-177
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume81
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
Rupture
Dissection
Decision Making
Aptitude
Body Surface Area
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Davies, R. R., Gallo, A., Coady, M. A., Tellides, G., Botta, D. M., Burke, B., ... Elefteriades, J. A. (2006). Novel measurement of relative aortic size predicts rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 81(1), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.026

Novel measurement of relative aortic size predicts rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysms. / Davies, Ryan R; Gallo, Amy; Coady, Michael A.; Tellides, George; Botta, Donald M.; Burke, Brendan; Coe, Marcus P.; Kopf, Gary S.; Elefteriades, John A.

In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 81, No. 1, 01.01.2006, p. 169-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davies, RR, Gallo, A, Coady, MA, Tellides, G, Botta, DM, Burke, B, Coe, MP, Kopf, GS & Elefteriades, JA 2006, 'Novel measurement of relative aortic size predicts rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysms', Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.026
Davies, Ryan R ; Gallo, Amy ; Coady, Michael A. ; Tellides, George ; Botta, Donald M. ; Burke, Brendan ; Coe, Marcus P. ; Kopf, Gary S. ; Elefteriades, John A. / Novel measurement of relative aortic size predicts rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysms. In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 81, No. 1. pp. 169-177.
@article{6264bd21d94f4858a076006ff3e57382,
title = "Novel measurement of relative aortic size predicts rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysms",
abstract = "Background. Optimal operative decision making in thoracic aortic aneurysms requires accurate information on the risk of complications during expectant management. Cumulative and yearly risks of rupture, dissection, and death before operative repair increase with increasing aortic size, but previous work has not addressed the impact of relative aortic size on complication rates. Methods. Our institutional database contains data on 805 patients followed up serially with thoracic aortic aneurysms. Body surface area information was obtained on 410 patients (257 male, 153 female). We calculated a new measure of relative aortic size, the {"}aortic size index,{"} and examined its ability to predict complications in these patients. Results. Increasing aortic size index was a significant predictor of increasing rates of rupture (p = 0.0014) as well as the combined endpoint of rupture, death, or dissection (p < 0.0001). Using aortic size index, patients were stratified into three risk groups: less than 2.75 cm/m2 are at low risk (approximately 4{\%} per year), 2.75 to 4.24 cm/m2 are at moderate risk (approximately 8{\%} per year), and those above 4.25 cm/m2 are at high risk (approximately 20{\%} per year). Conclusions. This study confirms that (1) thoracic aortic aneurysm is a lethal disease, (2) relative aortic size is more important than absolute aortic size in predicting complications, and (3) a novel measurement of relative aortic size allows for the stratification of patients into three levels of risk, enabling appropriate surgical decision-making.",
author = "Davies, {Ryan R} and Amy Gallo and Coady, {Michael A.} and George Tellides and Botta, {Donald M.} and Brendan Burke and Coe, {Marcus P.} and Kopf, {Gary S.} and Elefteriades, {John A.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "169--177",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Novel measurement of relative aortic size predicts rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysms

AU - Davies, Ryan R

AU - Gallo, Amy

AU - Coady, Michael A.

AU - Tellides, George

AU - Botta, Donald M.

AU - Burke, Brendan

AU - Coe, Marcus P.

AU - Kopf, Gary S.

AU - Elefteriades, John A.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Background. Optimal operative decision making in thoracic aortic aneurysms requires accurate information on the risk of complications during expectant management. Cumulative and yearly risks of rupture, dissection, and death before operative repair increase with increasing aortic size, but previous work has not addressed the impact of relative aortic size on complication rates. Methods. Our institutional database contains data on 805 patients followed up serially with thoracic aortic aneurysms. Body surface area information was obtained on 410 patients (257 male, 153 female). We calculated a new measure of relative aortic size, the "aortic size index," and examined its ability to predict complications in these patients. Results. Increasing aortic size index was a significant predictor of increasing rates of rupture (p = 0.0014) as well as the combined endpoint of rupture, death, or dissection (p < 0.0001). Using aortic size index, patients were stratified into three risk groups: less than 2.75 cm/m2 are at low risk (approximately 4% per year), 2.75 to 4.24 cm/m2 are at moderate risk (approximately 8% per year), and those above 4.25 cm/m2 are at high risk (approximately 20% per year). Conclusions. This study confirms that (1) thoracic aortic aneurysm is a lethal disease, (2) relative aortic size is more important than absolute aortic size in predicting complications, and (3) a novel measurement of relative aortic size allows for the stratification of patients into three levels of risk, enabling appropriate surgical decision-making.

AB - Background. Optimal operative decision making in thoracic aortic aneurysms requires accurate information on the risk of complications during expectant management. Cumulative and yearly risks of rupture, dissection, and death before operative repair increase with increasing aortic size, but previous work has not addressed the impact of relative aortic size on complication rates. Methods. Our institutional database contains data on 805 patients followed up serially with thoracic aortic aneurysms. Body surface area information was obtained on 410 patients (257 male, 153 female). We calculated a new measure of relative aortic size, the "aortic size index," and examined its ability to predict complications in these patients. Results. Increasing aortic size index was a significant predictor of increasing rates of rupture (p = 0.0014) as well as the combined endpoint of rupture, death, or dissection (p < 0.0001). Using aortic size index, patients were stratified into three risk groups: less than 2.75 cm/m2 are at low risk (approximately 4% per year), 2.75 to 4.24 cm/m2 are at moderate risk (approximately 8% per year), and those above 4.25 cm/m2 are at high risk (approximately 20% per year). Conclusions. This study confirms that (1) thoracic aortic aneurysm is a lethal disease, (2) relative aortic size is more important than absolute aortic size in predicting complications, and (3) a novel measurement of relative aortic size allows for the stratification of patients into three levels of risk, enabling appropriate surgical decision-making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29144516301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29144516301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.026

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.026

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 169

EP - 177

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 1

ER -