Ocular aberrations measured by the fourier-based waveScan and zernike-based LADARwave hartmann-shack aberrometers

Stefanie Knapp, Shady T. Awwad, Claudine Ghali, James P. McCulley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate agreements in lower and higher order aberration measurements by two Hartmann-Shack wavefront-sensing devices. METHODS: Using the VISX WaveScan and Alcon LADARWave aberrometers, ocular aberrations at a fixed optical zone of 6 mm were measured on 36 eyes of 18 patients. A tunable light intensity source was used to control pupil size, which was checked using infrared pupillometry. Repeatability of measurements was evaluated using the intra-class correlation coefficient with 3 consecutive measurements on each aberrometer. RESULTS: Mean absolute defocus for WaveScan and LADARWave was 2.82±2.69 and 2.93±3.24 rootmean-square (RMS) μm, whereas astigmatism was 0.81±0.49 and 0.87±0.57 μm, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients between the two aberrometers were 0.908 and 0.870 for defocus and astigmatism, respectively, whereas higher order aberration correlation was less tight (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.596 for coma, 0.746 for trefoil, 0.836 for spherical aberration, 0.637 for secondary astigmatism, and 0.963 for quadrafoil [P<.001 for all]). The LADARWave had a tendency to display more spherical aberration than the WaveScan, especially at high aberration values, with mean absolute difference in measurement of 0.12±0.08 μm, and only 44% of eyes having less than ±0.10 RMS pm of difference. The mean total higher order aberration absolute difference was 0.14±0.14 μm, with only 50% of eyes within ±0.1 RMS of agreement. Vector analysis revealed appreciable discrepancies in third- and fourth-order directional Zernike components, while showing similar values for fifth-order components. Intra-class correlation coefficient values for both aberrometers over different aberration orders showed excellent repeatability. CONCLUSIONS: The WaveScan and LADARWave share similar lower order aberration measurements, but display significantly different higher order aberration values.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)201-209
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume25
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Astigmatism
Pupil
Coma
Light
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Ocular aberrations measured by the fourier-based waveScan and zernike-based LADARwave hartmann-shack aberrometers. / Knapp, Stefanie; Awwad, Shady T.; Ghali, Claudine; McCulley, James P.

In: Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 25, No. 2, 02.2009, p. 201-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6d5274af739047f1947623352fcbec61,
title = "Ocular aberrations measured by the fourier-based waveScan and zernike-based LADARwave hartmann-shack aberrometers",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate agreements in lower and higher order aberration measurements by two Hartmann-Shack wavefront-sensing devices. METHODS: Using the VISX WaveScan and Alcon LADARWave aberrometers, ocular aberrations at a fixed optical zone of 6 mm were measured on 36 eyes of 18 patients. A tunable light intensity source was used to control pupil size, which was checked using infrared pupillometry. Repeatability of measurements was evaluated using the intra-class correlation coefficient with 3 consecutive measurements on each aberrometer. RESULTS: Mean absolute defocus for WaveScan and LADARWave was 2.82±2.69 and 2.93±3.24 rootmean-square (RMS) μm, whereas astigmatism was 0.81±0.49 and 0.87±0.57 μm, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients between the two aberrometers were 0.908 and 0.870 for defocus and astigmatism, respectively, whereas higher order aberration correlation was less tight (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.596 for coma, 0.746 for trefoil, 0.836 for spherical aberration, 0.637 for secondary astigmatism, and 0.963 for quadrafoil [P<.001 for all]). The LADARWave had a tendency to display more spherical aberration than the WaveScan, especially at high aberration values, with mean absolute difference in measurement of 0.12±0.08 μm, and only 44{\%} of eyes having less than ±0.10 RMS pm of difference. The mean total higher order aberration absolute difference was 0.14±0.14 μm, with only 50{\%} of eyes within ±0.1 RMS of agreement. Vector analysis revealed appreciable discrepancies in third- and fourth-order directional Zernike components, while showing similar values for fifth-order components. Intra-class correlation coefficient values for both aberrometers over different aberration orders showed excellent repeatability. CONCLUSIONS: The WaveScan and LADARWave share similar lower order aberration measurements, but display significantly different higher order aberration values.",
author = "Stefanie Knapp and Awwad, {Shady T.} and Claudine Ghali and McCulley, {James P.}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "201--209",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0883-0444",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ocular aberrations measured by the fourier-based waveScan and zernike-based LADARwave hartmann-shack aberrometers

AU - Knapp, Stefanie

AU - Awwad, Shady T.

AU - Ghali, Claudine

AU - McCulley, James P.

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate agreements in lower and higher order aberration measurements by two Hartmann-Shack wavefront-sensing devices. METHODS: Using the VISX WaveScan and Alcon LADARWave aberrometers, ocular aberrations at a fixed optical zone of 6 mm were measured on 36 eyes of 18 patients. A tunable light intensity source was used to control pupil size, which was checked using infrared pupillometry. Repeatability of measurements was evaluated using the intra-class correlation coefficient with 3 consecutive measurements on each aberrometer. RESULTS: Mean absolute defocus for WaveScan and LADARWave was 2.82±2.69 and 2.93±3.24 rootmean-square (RMS) μm, whereas astigmatism was 0.81±0.49 and 0.87±0.57 μm, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients between the two aberrometers were 0.908 and 0.870 for defocus and astigmatism, respectively, whereas higher order aberration correlation was less tight (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.596 for coma, 0.746 for trefoil, 0.836 for spherical aberration, 0.637 for secondary astigmatism, and 0.963 for quadrafoil [P<.001 for all]). The LADARWave had a tendency to display more spherical aberration than the WaveScan, especially at high aberration values, with mean absolute difference in measurement of 0.12±0.08 μm, and only 44% of eyes having less than ±0.10 RMS pm of difference. The mean total higher order aberration absolute difference was 0.14±0.14 μm, with only 50% of eyes within ±0.1 RMS of agreement. Vector analysis revealed appreciable discrepancies in third- and fourth-order directional Zernike components, while showing similar values for fifth-order components. Intra-class correlation coefficient values for both aberrometers over different aberration orders showed excellent repeatability. CONCLUSIONS: The WaveScan and LADARWave share similar lower order aberration measurements, but display significantly different higher order aberration values.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate agreements in lower and higher order aberration measurements by two Hartmann-Shack wavefront-sensing devices. METHODS: Using the VISX WaveScan and Alcon LADARWave aberrometers, ocular aberrations at a fixed optical zone of 6 mm were measured on 36 eyes of 18 patients. A tunable light intensity source was used to control pupil size, which was checked using infrared pupillometry. Repeatability of measurements was evaluated using the intra-class correlation coefficient with 3 consecutive measurements on each aberrometer. RESULTS: Mean absolute defocus for WaveScan and LADARWave was 2.82±2.69 and 2.93±3.24 rootmean-square (RMS) μm, whereas astigmatism was 0.81±0.49 and 0.87±0.57 μm, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients between the two aberrometers were 0.908 and 0.870 for defocus and astigmatism, respectively, whereas higher order aberration correlation was less tight (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.596 for coma, 0.746 for trefoil, 0.836 for spherical aberration, 0.637 for secondary astigmatism, and 0.963 for quadrafoil [P<.001 for all]). The LADARWave had a tendency to display more spherical aberration than the WaveScan, especially at high aberration values, with mean absolute difference in measurement of 0.12±0.08 μm, and only 44% of eyes having less than ±0.10 RMS pm of difference. The mean total higher order aberration absolute difference was 0.14±0.14 μm, with only 50% of eyes within ±0.1 RMS of agreement. Vector analysis revealed appreciable discrepancies in third- and fourth-order directional Zernike components, while showing similar values for fifth-order components. Intra-class correlation coefficient values for both aberrometers over different aberration orders showed excellent repeatability. CONCLUSIONS: The WaveScan and LADARWave share similar lower order aberration measurements, but display significantly different higher order aberration values.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60849086495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60849086495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19241771

AN - SCOPUS:60849086495

VL - 25

SP - 201

EP - 209

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 0883-0444

IS - 2

ER -