On-call communication in orthopaedic trauma: "a picture is worth a thousand words"-A survey of ota members

Cesar S. Molina, Alexandra K. Callan, Eduardo J. Burgos, Hassan R. Mir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Objectives: To quantify the effects of varying clinical communication styles (verbal and pictorial) on the ability of orthopaedic trauma surgeons in understanding an injury and formulate an initial management plan. Methods: A Research Electronic Data Capture survey was e-mailed to all OTA members. Respondents quantified (5-point Likert scale) how confident they felt understanding an injury and establishing an initial management plan based on the information provided for 5 common orthopaedic trauma scenarios. Three verbal descriptions were created for each scenario and categorized as limited, moderate, or detailed. The questions were repeated with the addition of a radiographic image and then repeated a third time including a clinical photograph. Statistical evaluation consisted of descriptive statistics and Kruskal-Wallis analyses using STATA (version 12.0). Results: Of the 221 respondents, there were a total of 95 who completed the entire survey. Nearly all were currently taking call (92/95 96.8%) and the majority were fellowship trained (79/95 83.2%). Most practice at a level I trauma center (58/95 61.1%) and work with orthopaedic residents (62/95 65.3%). There was a significant increase in confidence scores between a limited, moderate, and detailed description in all clinical scenarios for understanding the injury and establishing an initial management plan (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in confidence scores between all 3 types of evidence presented (verbal, verbal + X-ray, verbal + X-ray + photograph) in both understanding and managing the injury for limited and moderate descriptions (P < 0.001). No differences were seen when adding pictorial information to the detailed verbal description. When comparing confidence scores between a detailed description without images and a limited description that includes radiographs and a photograph, no difference in confidence levels was seen in 7 of the 10 scenarios (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The addition of images in the form of radiographs and/or clinical photographs greatly improves the confidence of orthopaedic trauma surgeons in understanding injuries and establishing initial management plans with limited verbal information (P < 0.001). The inclusion of X-rays and photographs raises the confidence for understanding and management with limited verbal information to the level of a detailed verbal description in most scenarios. Mobile technology allows for easy secure transfer of images that can make up for the lack of available information from limited verbal descriptions because of the knowledge base of communicating providers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e194-e197
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Orthopedics
Communication
Wounds and Injuries
Aptitude
Knowledge Bases
Trauma Centers
Surveys and Questionnaires
X-Rays
Technology
Research

Keywords

  • communication
  • images
  • on-call
  • technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

On-call communication in orthopaedic trauma : "a picture is worth a thousand words"-A survey of ota members. / Molina, Cesar S.; Callan, Alexandra K.; Burgos, Eduardo J.; Mir, Hassan R.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 29, No. 5, 01.01.2015, p. e194-e197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1349805a921a4119a594b03e7999da24,
title = "On-call communication in orthopaedic trauma: {"}a picture is worth a thousand words{"}-A survey of ota members",
abstract = "Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Objectives: To quantify the effects of varying clinical communication styles (verbal and pictorial) on the ability of orthopaedic trauma surgeons in understanding an injury and formulate an initial management plan. Methods: A Research Electronic Data Capture survey was e-mailed to all OTA members. Respondents quantified (5-point Likert scale) how confident they felt understanding an injury and establishing an initial management plan based on the information provided for 5 common orthopaedic trauma scenarios. Three verbal descriptions were created for each scenario and categorized as limited, moderate, or detailed. The questions were repeated with the addition of a radiographic image and then repeated a third time including a clinical photograph. Statistical evaluation consisted of descriptive statistics and Kruskal-Wallis analyses using STATA (version 12.0). Results: Of the 221 respondents, there were a total of 95 who completed the entire survey. Nearly all were currently taking call (92/95 96.8{\%}) and the majority were fellowship trained (79/95 83.2{\%}). Most practice at a level I trauma center (58/95 61.1{\%}) and work with orthopaedic residents (62/95 65.3{\%}). There was a significant increase in confidence scores between a limited, moderate, and detailed description in all clinical scenarios for understanding the injury and establishing an initial management plan (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in confidence scores between all 3 types of evidence presented (verbal, verbal + X-ray, verbal + X-ray + photograph) in both understanding and managing the injury for limited and moderate descriptions (P < 0.001). No differences were seen when adding pictorial information to the detailed verbal description. When comparing confidence scores between a detailed description without images and a limited description that includes radiographs and a photograph, no difference in confidence levels was seen in 7 of the 10 scenarios (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The addition of images in the form of radiographs and/or clinical photographs greatly improves the confidence of orthopaedic trauma surgeons in understanding injuries and establishing initial management plans with limited verbal information (P < 0.001). The inclusion of X-rays and photographs raises the confidence for understanding and management with limited verbal information to the level of a detailed verbal description in most scenarios. Mobile technology allows for easy secure transfer of images that can make up for the lack of available information from limited verbal descriptions because of the knowledge base of communicating providers.",
keywords = "communication, images, on-call, technology",
author = "Molina, {Cesar S.} and Callan, {Alexandra K.} and Burgos, {Eduardo J.} and Mir, {Hassan R.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BOT.0000000000000236",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "e194--e197",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On-call communication in orthopaedic trauma

T2 - "a picture is worth a thousand words"-A survey of ota members

AU - Molina, Cesar S.

AU - Callan, Alexandra K.

AU - Burgos, Eduardo J.

AU - Mir, Hassan R.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Objectives: To quantify the effects of varying clinical communication styles (verbal and pictorial) on the ability of orthopaedic trauma surgeons in understanding an injury and formulate an initial management plan. Methods: A Research Electronic Data Capture survey was e-mailed to all OTA members. Respondents quantified (5-point Likert scale) how confident they felt understanding an injury and establishing an initial management plan based on the information provided for 5 common orthopaedic trauma scenarios. Three verbal descriptions were created for each scenario and categorized as limited, moderate, or detailed. The questions were repeated with the addition of a radiographic image and then repeated a third time including a clinical photograph. Statistical evaluation consisted of descriptive statistics and Kruskal-Wallis analyses using STATA (version 12.0). Results: Of the 221 respondents, there were a total of 95 who completed the entire survey. Nearly all were currently taking call (92/95 96.8%) and the majority were fellowship trained (79/95 83.2%). Most practice at a level I trauma center (58/95 61.1%) and work with orthopaedic residents (62/95 65.3%). There was a significant increase in confidence scores between a limited, moderate, and detailed description in all clinical scenarios for understanding the injury and establishing an initial management plan (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in confidence scores between all 3 types of evidence presented (verbal, verbal + X-ray, verbal + X-ray + photograph) in both understanding and managing the injury for limited and moderate descriptions (P < 0.001). No differences were seen when adding pictorial information to the detailed verbal description. When comparing confidence scores between a detailed description without images and a limited description that includes radiographs and a photograph, no difference in confidence levels was seen in 7 of the 10 scenarios (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The addition of images in the form of radiographs and/or clinical photographs greatly improves the confidence of orthopaedic trauma surgeons in understanding injuries and establishing initial management plans with limited verbal information (P < 0.001). The inclusion of X-rays and photographs raises the confidence for understanding and management with limited verbal information to the level of a detailed verbal description in most scenarios. Mobile technology allows for easy secure transfer of images that can make up for the lack of available information from limited verbal descriptions because of the knowledge base of communicating providers.

AB - Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Objectives: To quantify the effects of varying clinical communication styles (verbal and pictorial) on the ability of orthopaedic trauma surgeons in understanding an injury and formulate an initial management plan. Methods: A Research Electronic Data Capture survey was e-mailed to all OTA members. Respondents quantified (5-point Likert scale) how confident they felt understanding an injury and establishing an initial management plan based on the information provided for 5 common orthopaedic trauma scenarios. Three verbal descriptions were created for each scenario and categorized as limited, moderate, or detailed. The questions were repeated with the addition of a radiographic image and then repeated a third time including a clinical photograph. Statistical evaluation consisted of descriptive statistics and Kruskal-Wallis analyses using STATA (version 12.0). Results: Of the 221 respondents, there were a total of 95 who completed the entire survey. Nearly all were currently taking call (92/95 96.8%) and the majority were fellowship trained (79/95 83.2%). Most practice at a level I trauma center (58/95 61.1%) and work with orthopaedic residents (62/95 65.3%). There was a significant increase in confidence scores between a limited, moderate, and detailed description in all clinical scenarios for understanding the injury and establishing an initial management plan (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in confidence scores between all 3 types of evidence presented (verbal, verbal + X-ray, verbal + X-ray + photograph) in both understanding and managing the injury for limited and moderate descriptions (P < 0.001). No differences were seen when adding pictorial information to the detailed verbal description. When comparing confidence scores between a detailed description without images and a limited description that includes radiographs and a photograph, no difference in confidence levels was seen in 7 of the 10 scenarios (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The addition of images in the form of radiographs and/or clinical photographs greatly improves the confidence of orthopaedic trauma surgeons in understanding injuries and establishing initial management plans with limited verbal information (P < 0.001). The inclusion of X-rays and photographs raises the confidence for understanding and management with limited verbal information to the level of a detailed verbal description in most scenarios. Mobile technology allows for easy secure transfer of images that can make up for the lack of available information from limited verbal descriptions because of the knowledge base of communicating providers.

KW - communication

KW - images

KW - on-call

KW - technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928269641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928269641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000236

DO - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000236

M3 - Article

C2 - 25210834

AN - SCOPUS:84928269641

VL - 29

SP - e194-e197

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 5

ER -