On Reconsidering Maslow: An Examination of the Deprivation/Domination Proposition

Frank W. Wicker, Gail Brown, James A. Wiehe, Anastasia S. Hagen, Joy Lynn Reed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several earlier studies failed to support propositions derived from Maslow′s motivation theory, such as the proposal that needs become stronger with deprivation (Deprivation/Domination Proposition). We argue that significance of these negative findings is limited by serious methodological problems, and we present data to document and help overcome some of them. Across four data sets, between-goal correlations and partial correlations tended to support Maslow′s proposition with "intention" ratings but not with the traditionally-used "importance" ratings. Smaller differences in scale wording also affected outcomes. Negative reactions to nonattainment were relatively larger for goals related to lower needs in Maslow′s hierarchy; positive reactions to attainment were larger at higher levels. Results do not support earlier suggestions that the proposition has been invalidated empirically.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)118-133
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Research in Personality
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1993

Fingerprint

Motivation
Datasets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

On Reconsidering Maslow : An Examination of the Deprivation/Domination Proposition. / Wicker, Frank W.; Brown, Gail; Wiehe, James A.; Hagen, Anastasia S.; Reed, Joy Lynn.

In: Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 27, No. 2, 06.1993, p. 118-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wicker, Frank W. ; Brown, Gail ; Wiehe, James A. ; Hagen, Anastasia S. ; Reed, Joy Lynn. / On Reconsidering Maslow : An Examination of the Deprivation/Domination Proposition. In: Journal of Research in Personality. 1993 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 118-133.
@article{8f1cf3933e5947aa839856677d1e8569,
title = "On Reconsidering Maslow: An Examination of the Deprivation/Domination Proposition",
abstract = "Several earlier studies failed to support propositions derived from Maslow′s motivation theory, such as the proposal that needs become stronger with deprivation (Deprivation/Domination Proposition). We argue that significance of these negative findings is limited by serious methodological problems, and we present data to document and help overcome some of them. Across four data sets, between-goal correlations and partial correlations tended to support Maslow′s proposition with {"}intention{"} ratings but not with the traditionally-used {"}importance{"} ratings. Smaller differences in scale wording also affected outcomes. Negative reactions to nonattainment were relatively larger for goals related to lower needs in Maslow′s hierarchy; positive reactions to attainment were larger at higher levels. Results do not support earlier suggestions that the proposition has been invalidated empirically.",
author = "Wicker, {Frank W.} and Gail Brown and Wiehe, {James A.} and Hagen, {Anastasia S.} and Reed, {Joy Lynn}",
year = "1993",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1006/jrpe.1993.1008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "118--133",
journal = "Journal of Research in Personality",
issn = "0092-6566",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On Reconsidering Maslow

T2 - An Examination of the Deprivation/Domination Proposition

AU - Wicker, Frank W.

AU - Brown, Gail

AU - Wiehe, James A.

AU - Hagen, Anastasia S.

AU - Reed, Joy Lynn

PY - 1993/6

Y1 - 1993/6

N2 - Several earlier studies failed to support propositions derived from Maslow′s motivation theory, such as the proposal that needs become stronger with deprivation (Deprivation/Domination Proposition). We argue that significance of these negative findings is limited by serious methodological problems, and we present data to document and help overcome some of them. Across four data sets, between-goal correlations and partial correlations tended to support Maslow′s proposition with "intention" ratings but not with the traditionally-used "importance" ratings. Smaller differences in scale wording also affected outcomes. Negative reactions to nonattainment were relatively larger for goals related to lower needs in Maslow′s hierarchy; positive reactions to attainment were larger at higher levels. Results do not support earlier suggestions that the proposition has been invalidated empirically.

AB - Several earlier studies failed to support propositions derived from Maslow′s motivation theory, such as the proposal that needs become stronger with deprivation (Deprivation/Domination Proposition). We argue that significance of these negative findings is limited by serious methodological problems, and we present data to document and help overcome some of them. Across four data sets, between-goal correlations and partial correlations tended to support Maslow′s proposition with "intention" ratings but not with the traditionally-used "importance" ratings. Smaller differences in scale wording also affected outcomes. Negative reactions to nonattainment were relatively larger for goals related to lower needs in Maslow′s hierarchy; positive reactions to attainment were larger at higher levels. Results do not support earlier suggestions that the proposition has been invalidated empirically.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039108906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0039108906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jrpe.1993.1008

DO - 10.1006/jrpe.1993.1008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0039108906

VL - 27

SP - 118

EP - 133

JO - Journal of Research in Personality

JF - Journal of Research in Personality

SN - 0092-6566

IS - 2

ER -