On the relationships between electron spot size, focal spot size, and virtual source position in Monte Carlo simulations

E. Sterpin, Y. Chen, W. Lu, T. R. MacKie, G. H. Olivera, S. Vynckier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Every year, new radiotherapy techniques including stereotactic radiosurgery using linear accelerators give rise to new applications of Monte Carlo (MC) modeling. Accurate modeling requires knowing the size of the electron spot, one of the few parameters to tune in MC models. The resolution of integrated megavoltage imaging systems, such as the tomotherapy system, strongly depends on the photon spot size which is closely related to the electron spot. The aim of this article is to clarify the relationship between the electron spot size and the photon spot size (i.e., the focal spot size) for typical incident electron beam energies and target thicknesses. Methods: Three electron energies (3, 5.5, and 18 MeV), four electron spot sizes (FWHM=0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 mm), and two tungsten target thicknesses (0.15 and 1 cm) were considered. The formation of the photon beam within the target was analyzed through electron energy deposition with depth, as well as photon production at several phase-space planes placed perpendicular to the beam axis, where only photons recorded for the first time were accounted for. Photon production was considered for "newborn" photons intersecting a 45×45 cm 2 plane at the isocenter (85 cm from source). Finally, virtual source position and "effective" focal spot size were computed by backprojecting all the photons from the bottom of the target intersecting a 45×45 cm 2 plane. The virtual source position and focal spot size were estimated at the plane position where the latter is minimal. Results: In the relevant case of considering only photons intersecting the 45×45 cm 2 plane, the results unambiguously showed that the effective photon spot is created within the first 0.25 mm of the target and that electron and focal spots may be assumed to be equal within 3-4%. Conclusions: In a good approximation photon spot size equals electron spot size for high energy X-ray treatments delivered by linear accelerators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1579-1586
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Physics
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Photons
Electrons
Particle Accelerators
Tungsten
Radiosurgery
Radiotherapy
X-Rays

Keywords

  • beam modeling
  • Monte Carlo

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

On the relationships between electron spot size, focal spot size, and virtual source position in Monte Carlo simulations. / Sterpin, E.; Chen, Y.; Lu, W.; MacKie, T. R.; Olivera, G. H.; Vynckier, S.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 38, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 1579-1586.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sterpin, E. ; Chen, Y. ; Lu, W. ; MacKie, T. R. ; Olivera, G. H. ; Vynckier, S. / On the relationships between electron spot size, focal spot size, and virtual source position in Monte Carlo simulations. In: Medical Physics. 2011 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 1579-1586.
@article{242b8912de3f454b9fce0407eca739a4,
title = "On the relationships between electron spot size, focal spot size, and virtual source position in Monte Carlo simulations",
abstract = "Purpose: Every year, new radiotherapy techniques including stereotactic radiosurgery using linear accelerators give rise to new applications of Monte Carlo (MC) modeling. Accurate modeling requires knowing the size of the electron spot, one of the few parameters to tune in MC models. The resolution of integrated megavoltage imaging systems, such as the tomotherapy system, strongly depends on the photon spot size which is closely related to the electron spot. The aim of this article is to clarify the relationship between the electron spot size and the photon spot size (i.e., the focal spot size) for typical incident electron beam energies and target thicknesses. Methods: Three electron energies (3, 5.5, and 18 MeV), four electron spot sizes (FWHM=0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 mm), and two tungsten target thicknesses (0.15 and 1 cm) were considered. The formation of the photon beam within the target was analyzed through electron energy deposition with depth, as well as photon production at several phase-space planes placed perpendicular to the beam axis, where only photons recorded for the first time were accounted for. Photon production was considered for {"}newborn{"} photons intersecting a 45×45 cm 2 plane at the isocenter (85 cm from source). Finally, virtual source position and {"}effective{"} focal spot size were computed by backprojecting all the photons from the bottom of the target intersecting a 45×45 cm 2 plane. The virtual source position and focal spot size were estimated at the plane position where the latter is minimal. Results: In the relevant case of considering only photons intersecting the 45×45 cm 2 plane, the results unambiguously showed that the effective photon spot is created within the first 0.25 mm of the target and that electron and focal spots may be assumed to be equal within 3-4{\%}. Conclusions: In a good approximation photon spot size equals electron spot size for high energy X-ray treatments delivered by linear accelerators.",
keywords = "beam modeling, Monte Carlo",
author = "E. Sterpin and Y. Chen and W. Lu and MacKie, {T. R.} and Olivera, {G. H.} and S. Vynckier",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1118/1.3556560",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1579--1586",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the relationships between electron spot size, focal spot size, and virtual source position in Monte Carlo simulations

AU - Sterpin, E.

AU - Chen, Y.

AU - Lu, W.

AU - MacKie, T. R.

AU - Olivera, G. H.

AU - Vynckier, S.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Purpose: Every year, new radiotherapy techniques including stereotactic radiosurgery using linear accelerators give rise to new applications of Monte Carlo (MC) modeling. Accurate modeling requires knowing the size of the electron spot, one of the few parameters to tune in MC models. The resolution of integrated megavoltage imaging systems, such as the tomotherapy system, strongly depends on the photon spot size which is closely related to the electron spot. The aim of this article is to clarify the relationship between the electron spot size and the photon spot size (i.e., the focal spot size) for typical incident electron beam energies and target thicknesses. Methods: Three electron energies (3, 5.5, and 18 MeV), four electron spot sizes (FWHM=0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 mm), and two tungsten target thicknesses (0.15 and 1 cm) were considered. The formation of the photon beam within the target was analyzed through electron energy deposition with depth, as well as photon production at several phase-space planes placed perpendicular to the beam axis, where only photons recorded for the first time were accounted for. Photon production was considered for "newborn" photons intersecting a 45×45 cm 2 plane at the isocenter (85 cm from source). Finally, virtual source position and "effective" focal spot size were computed by backprojecting all the photons from the bottom of the target intersecting a 45×45 cm 2 plane. The virtual source position and focal spot size were estimated at the plane position where the latter is minimal. Results: In the relevant case of considering only photons intersecting the 45×45 cm 2 plane, the results unambiguously showed that the effective photon spot is created within the first 0.25 mm of the target and that electron and focal spots may be assumed to be equal within 3-4%. Conclusions: In a good approximation photon spot size equals electron spot size for high energy X-ray treatments delivered by linear accelerators.

AB - Purpose: Every year, new radiotherapy techniques including stereotactic radiosurgery using linear accelerators give rise to new applications of Monte Carlo (MC) modeling. Accurate modeling requires knowing the size of the electron spot, one of the few parameters to tune in MC models. The resolution of integrated megavoltage imaging systems, such as the tomotherapy system, strongly depends on the photon spot size which is closely related to the electron spot. The aim of this article is to clarify the relationship between the electron spot size and the photon spot size (i.e., the focal spot size) for typical incident electron beam energies and target thicknesses. Methods: Three electron energies (3, 5.5, and 18 MeV), four electron spot sizes (FWHM=0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 mm), and two tungsten target thicknesses (0.15 and 1 cm) were considered. The formation of the photon beam within the target was analyzed through electron energy deposition with depth, as well as photon production at several phase-space planes placed perpendicular to the beam axis, where only photons recorded for the first time were accounted for. Photon production was considered for "newborn" photons intersecting a 45×45 cm 2 plane at the isocenter (85 cm from source). Finally, virtual source position and "effective" focal spot size were computed by backprojecting all the photons from the bottom of the target intersecting a 45×45 cm 2 plane. The virtual source position and focal spot size were estimated at the plane position where the latter is minimal. Results: In the relevant case of considering only photons intersecting the 45×45 cm 2 plane, the results unambiguously showed that the effective photon spot is created within the first 0.25 mm of the target and that electron and focal spots may be assumed to be equal within 3-4%. Conclusions: In a good approximation photon spot size equals electron spot size for high energy X-ray treatments delivered by linear accelerators.

KW - beam modeling

KW - Monte Carlo

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952149050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952149050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3556560

DO - 10.1118/1.3556560

M3 - Article

C2 - 21520869

AN - SCOPUS:79952149050

VL - 38

SP - 1579

EP - 1586

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 3

ER -