One eye or two

A comparison of binocular and monocular low-contrast acuity testing in multiple sclerosis

Stacy L. Pineles, Eileen E. Birch, Lauren S. Talman, David J. Sackel, Elliot Frohman, Peter A. Calabresi, Steven L. Galetta, Maureen G. Maguire, Laura J. Balcer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the magnitudes of binocular summation for low- and high-contrast letter acuity in a multiple sclerosis (MS) cohort, and to characterize the roles that MS disease, age, interocular difference in acuity, and a history of optic neuritis have on binocular summation. The relation between binocular summation and monocular acuities and vision-specific quality of life (QoL) was also examined. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Methods: Low-contrast acuity (2.5% and 1.25% contrast) and high-contrast visual acuity (VA) were assessed binocularly and monocularly in patients and disease-free controls at 3 academic centers. Binocular summation was calculated as the difference between the binocular and better eye scores. QoL was measured using the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) and the 10-item neuro-ophthalmic supplement. The relation of the degree of binocular summation to monocular acuity, clinical history of acute optic neuritis, age, interocular acuity difference, and QoL was determined. Results: Binocular summation was demonstrated at all contrast levels, and was greatest at the lowest level (1.25%). Increasing age (P < .0001), greater interocular differences in acuity (P < .0001), and prior history of optic neuritis (P = .015) were associated with lower magnitudes of binocular summation; binocular inhibition was seen in some of these patients. Higher magnitudes of summation for 2.5% low-contrast acuity were associated with better scores for the NEI VFQ-25 (P = .02) and neuro-ophthalmic supplement (P = .03). Conclusion: Binocular summation of acuity occurs in MS but is reduced by optic neuritis, which may lead to binocular inhibition. Binocular summation and inhibition are important factors in the QoL and visual experience of MS patients, and may explain why some prefer to patch or close 1 eye in the absence of diplopia or ocular misalignment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-140
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume152
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Optic Neuritis
Multiple Sclerosis
Quality of Life
Monocular Vision
National Eye Institute (U.S.)
Diplopia
Life Change Events
Visual Acuity
Observational Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Inhibition (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

One eye or two : A comparison of binocular and monocular low-contrast acuity testing in multiple sclerosis. / Pineles, Stacy L.; Birch, Eileen E.; Talman, Lauren S.; Sackel, David J.; Frohman, Elliot; Calabresi, Peter A.; Galetta, Steven L.; Maguire, Maureen G.; Balcer, Laura J.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 152, No. 1, 07.2011, p. 133-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pineles, SL, Birch, EE, Talman, LS, Sackel, DJ, Frohman, E, Calabresi, PA, Galetta, SL, Maguire, MG & Balcer, LJ 2011, 'One eye or two: A comparison of binocular and monocular low-contrast acuity testing in multiple sclerosis', American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 133-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.023
Pineles, Stacy L. ; Birch, Eileen E. ; Talman, Lauren S. ; Sackel, David J. ; Frohman, Elliot ; Calabresi, Peter A. ; Galetta, Steven L. ; Maguire, Maureen G. ; Balcer, Laura J. / One eye or two : A comparison of binocular and monocular low-contrast acuity testing in multiple sclerosis. In: American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011 ; Vol. 152, No. 1. pp. 133-140.
@article{412002271ab04d4ca0e2a992e852e7ff,
title = "One eye or two: A comparison of binocular and monocular low-contrast acuity testing in multiple sclerosis",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine the magnitudes of binocular summation for low- and high-contrast letter acuity in a multiple sclerosis (MS) cohort, and to characterize the roles that MS disease, age, interocular difference in acuity, and a history of optic neuritis have on binocular summation. The relation between binocular summation and monocular acuities and vision-specific quality of life (QoL) was also examined. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Methods: Low-contrast acuity (2.5{\%} and 1.25{\%} contrast) and high-contrast visual acuity (VA) were assessed binocularly and monocularly in patients and disease-free controls at 3 academic centers. Binocular summation was calculated as the difference between the binocular and better eye scores. QoL was measured using the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) and the 10-item neuro-ophthalmic supplement. The relation of the degree of binocular summation to monocular acuity, clinical history of acute optic neuritis, age, interocular acuity difference, and QoL was determined. Results: Binocular summation was demonstrated at all contrast levels, and was greatest at the lowest level (1.25{\%}). Increasing age (P < .0001), greater interocular differences in acuity (P < .0001), and prior history of optic neuritis (P = .015) were associated with lower magnitudes of binocular summation; binocular inhibition was seen in some of these patients. Higher magnitudes of summation for 2.5{\%} low-contrast acuity were associated with better scores for the NEI VFQ-25 (P = .02) and neuro-ophthalmic supplement (P = .03). Conclusion: Binocular summation of acuity occurs in MS but is reduced by optic neuritis, which may lead to binocular inhibition. Binocular summation and inhibition are important factors in the QoL and visual experience of MS patients, and may explain why some prefer to patch or close 1 eye in the absence of diplopia or ocular misalignment.",
author = "Pineles, {Stacy L.} and Birch, {Eileen E.} and Talman, {Lauren S.} and Sackel, {David J.} and Elliot Frohman and Calabresi, {Peter A.} and Galetta, {Steven L.} and Maguire, {Maureen G.} and Balcer, {Laura J.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "152",
pages = "133--140",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - One eye or two

T2 - A comparison of binocular and monocular low-contrast acuity testing in multiple sclerosis

AU - Pineles, Stacy L.

AU - Birch, Eileen E.

AU - Talman, Lauren S.

AU - Sackel, David J.

AU - Frohman, Elliot

AU - Calabresi, Peter A.

AU - Galetta, Steven L.

AU - Maguire, Maureen G.

AU - Balcer, Laura J.

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Purpose: To determine the magnitudes of binocular summation for low- and high-contrast letter acuity in a multiple sclerosis (MS) cohort, and to characterize the roles that MS disease, age, interocular difference in acuity, and a history of optic neuritis have on binocular summation. The relation between binocular summation and monocular acuities and vision-specific quality of life (QoL) was also examined. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Methods: Low-contrast acuity (2.5% and 1.25% contrast) and high-contrast visual acuity (VA) were assessed binocularly and monocularly in patients and disease-free controls at 3 academic centers. Binocular summation was calculated as the difference between the binocular and better eye scores. QoL was measured using the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) and the 10-item neuro-ophthalmic supplement. The relation of the degree of binocular summation to monocular acuity, clinical history of acute optic neuritis, age, interocular acuity difference, and QoL was determined. Results: Binocular summation was demonstrated at all contrast levels, and was greatest at the lowest level (1.25%). Increasing age (P < .0001), greater interocular differences in acuity (P < .0001), and prior history of optic neuritis (P = .015) were associated with lower magnitudes of binocular summation; binocular inhibition was seen in some of these patients. Higher magnitudes of summation for 2.5% low-contrast acuity were associated with better scores for the NEI VFQ-25 (P = .02) and neuro-ophthalmic supplement (P = .03). Conclusion: Binocular summation of acuity occurs in MS but is reduced by optic neuritis, which may lead to binocular inhibition. Binocular summation and inhibition are important factors in the QoL and visual experience of MS patients, and may explain why some prefer to patch or close 1 eye in the absence of diplopia or ocular misalignment.

AB - Purpose: To determine the magnitudes of binocular summation for low- and high-contrast letter acuity in a multiple sclerosis (MS) cohort, and to characterize the roles that MS disease, age, interocular difference in acuity, and a history of optic neuritis have on binocular summation. The relation between binocular summation and monocular acuities and vision-specific quality of life (QoL) was also examined. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Methods: Low-contrast acuity (2.5% and 1.25% contrast) and high-contrast visual acuity (VA) were assessed binocularly and monocularly in patients and disease-free controls at 3 academic centers. Binocular summation was calculated as the difference between the binocular and better eye scores. QoL was measured using the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) and the 10-item neuro-ophthalmic supplement. The relation of the degree of binocular summation to monocular acuity, clinical history of acute optic neuritis, age, interocular acuity difference, and QoL was determined. Results: Binocular summation was demonstrated at all contrast levels, and was greatest at the lowest level (1.25%). Increasing age (P < .0001), greater interocular differences in acuity (P < .0001), and prior history of optic neuritis (P = .015) were associated with lower magnitudes of binocular summation; binocular inhibition was seen in some of these patients. Higher magnitudes of summation for 2.5% low-contrast acuity were associated with better scores for the NEI VFQ-25 (P = .02) and neuro-ophthalmic supplement (P = .03). Conclusion: Binocular summation of acuity occurs in MS but is reduced by optic neuritis, which may lead to binocular inhibition. Binocular summation and inhibition are important factors in the QoL and visual experience of MS patients, and may explain why some prefer to patch or close 1 eye in the absence of diplopia or ocular misalignment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959624532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959624532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.023

DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.023

M3 - Article

VL - 152

SP - 133

EP - 140

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 1

ER -