One-stage Soave pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease

A comparison of the transanal and open approaches

Jacob C. Langer, Michael Seifert, Robert K. Minkes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The authors reviewed their experience using the transanal Soave technique, to determine (1) if it offers any advantages over the standard open approach and (2) whether routine laparoscopic visualization is necessary. Methods: The case reports of 37 consecutive children less than 3 years old undergoing Soave pull-through were reviewed. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had total colon disease or had a previous colostomy. The patients were divided into 3 groups: open Soave (OS, n = 13), transanal Soave with routine laparoscopic visualization (LVS, n = 9), and transanal Soave with selective laparoscopy or minilaparotomy (TAS, n = 15). Cost was calculated based on hospital stay, operating room time, and use of laparoscopic equipment. Results: In the TAS group, suspicion of a longer segment led to the selective use of laparoscopy with or without biopsy in 2 children, and the use of a small umbilical incision for mobilization of the splenic flexure in 2. There were no differences among groups with respect to age, weight, gender, transition zone, operating time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, enterocolitis, or stricture or cuff narrowing. Hospital stay was significantly longer in the OS group (median, 7 days; range, 3 to 47) than the LVS (median, 1; range 1 to 6) or TAS (median, 1, range, 1 to 3) groups. Cost (in thousands of dollars) was also higher in the OS group (median, 6.9; range, 3.9-25.7) than the LVS (median, 3.9; range, 3.6 to 6.4) or TAS (median, 3.4; range, 2.2 to 9.4) groups. Repeat surgery was necessary for 4 OS patients: 2 adhesive small bowel obstructions (1 of whom died), 1 twisted pull-through, and 1 recurrent aganglionosis. Three TAS patients required repeat surgery: 1 twisted pull-through, 1 anastomotic leak, and 1 cuff narrowing. Conclusions: These data suggest that the transanal pull-through is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay and lower cost than the open approach, without an increased risk of complications. Because there is no intraabdominal dissection, there probably is a lower incidence of adhesive bowel obstruction. Routine laparoscopic visualization or minilaparotomy is not necessary but should be used in children who are at higher risk for long segment disease. Copyright (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)820-822
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume35
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2000

Fingerprint

Hirschsprung Disease
Length of Stay
Reoperation
Costs and Cost Analysis
Adhesives
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy
Enterocolitis
Umbilicus
Transverse Colon
Anastomotic Leak
Colostomy
Intraoperative Complications
Operating Rooms
Dissection
Pathologic Constriction
Colon
Biopsy
Weights and Measures
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Hirschsprung's disease
  • Laparoscopy
  • Minimally invasive surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

One-stage Soave pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease : A comparison of the transanal and open approaches. / Langer, Jacob C.; Seifert, Michael; Minkes, Robert K.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 35, No. 6, 06.2000, p. 820-822.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7e35767a5264d329b514fbce7c1e0ae,
title = "One-stage Soave pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: A comparison of the transanal and open approaches",
abstract = "Purpose: The authors reviewed their experience using the transanal Soave technique, to determine (1) if it offers any advantages over the standard open approach and (2) whether routine laparoscopic visualization is necessary. Methods: The case reports of 37 consecutive children less than 3 years old undergoing Soave pull-through were reviewed. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had total colon disease or had a previous colostomy. The patients were divided into 3 groups: open Soave (OS, n = 13), transanal Soave with routine laparoscopic visualization (LVS, n = 9), and transanal Soave with selective laparoscopy or minilaparotomy (TAS, n = 15). Cost was calculated based on hospital stay, operating room time, and use of laparoscopic equipment. Results: In the TAS group, suspicion of a longer segment led to the selective use of laparoscopy with or without biopsy in 2 children, and the use of a small umbilical incision for mobilization of the splenic flexure in 2. There were no differences among groups with respect to age, weight, gender, transition zone, operating time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, enterocolitis, or stricture or cuff narrowing. Hospital stay was significantly longer in the OS group (median, 7 days; range, 3 to 47) than the LVS (median, 1; range 1 to 6) or TAS (median, 1, range, 1 to 3) groups. Cost (in thousands of dollars) was also higher in the OS group (median, 6.9; range, 3.9-25.7) than the LVS (median, 3.9; range, 3.6 to 6.4) or TAS (median, 3.4; range, 2.2 to 9.4) groups. Repeat surgery was necessary for 4 OS patients: 2 adhesive small bowel obstructions (1 of whom died), 1 twisted pull-through, and 1 recurrent aganglionosis. Three TAS patients required repeat surgery: 1 twisted pull-through, 1 anastomotic leak, and 1 cuff narrowing. Conclusions: These data suggest that the transanal pull-through is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay and lower cost than the open approach, without an increased risk of complications. Because there is no intraabdominal dissection, there probably is a lower incidence of adhesive bowel obstruction. Routine laparoscopic visualization or minilaparotomy is not necessary but should be used in children who are at higher risk for long segment disease. Copyright (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company.",
keywords = "Complications, Hirschsprung's disease, Laparoscopy, Minimally invasive surgery",
author = "Langer, {Jacob C.} and Michael Seifert and Minkes, {Robert K.}",
year = "2000",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "820--822",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - One-stage Soave pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease

T2 - A comparison of the transanal and open approaches

AU - Langer, Jacob C.

AU - Seifert, Michael

AU - Minkes, Robert K.

PY - 2000/6

Y1 - 2000/6

N2 - Purpose: The authors reviewed their experience using the transanal Soave technique, to determine (1) if it offers any advantages over the standard open approach and (2) whether routine laparoscopic visualization is necessary. Methods: The case reports of 37 consecutive children less than 3 years old undergoing Soave pull-through were reviewed. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had total colon disease or had a previous colostomy. The patients were divided into 3 groups: open Soave (OS, n = 13), transanal Soave with routine laparoscopic visualization (LVS, n = 9), and transanal Soave with selective laparoscopy or minilaparotomy (TAS, n = 15). Cost was calculated based on hospital stay, operating room time, and use of laparoscopic equipment. Results: In the TAS group, suspicion of a longer segment led to the selective use of laparoscopy with or without biopsy in 2 children, and the use of a small umbilical incision for mobilization of the splenic flexure in 2. There were no differences among groups with respect to age, weight, gender, transition zone, operating time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, enterocolitis, or stricture or cuff narrowing. Hospital stay was significantly longer in the OS group (median, 7 days; range, 3 to 47) than the LVS (median, 1; range 1 to 6) or TAS (median, 1, range, 1 to 3) groups. Cost (in thousands of dollars) was also higher in the OS group (median, 6.9; range, 3.9-25.7) than the LVS (median, 3.9; range, 3.6 to 6.4) or TAS (median, 3.4; range, 2.2 to 9.4) groups. Repeat surgery was necessary for 4 OS patients: 2 adhesive small bowel obstructions (1 of whom died), 1 twisted pull-through, and 1 recurrent aganglionosis. Three TAS patients required repeat surgery: 1 twisted pull-through, 1 anastomotic leak, and 1 cuff narrowing. Conclusions: These data suggest that the transanal pull-through is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay and lower cost than the open approach, without an increased risk of complications. Because there is no intraabdominal dissection, there probably is a lower incidence of adhesive bowel obstruction. Routine laparoscopic visualization or minilaparotomy is not necessary but should be used in children who are at higher risk for long segment disease. Copyright (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company.

AB - Purpose: The authors reviewed their experience using the transanal Soave technique, to determine (1) if it offers any advantages over the standard open approach and (2) whether routine laparoscopic visualization is necessary. Methods: The case reports of 37 consecutive children less than 3 years old undergoing Soave pull-through were reviewed. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had total colon disease or had a previous colostomy. The patients were divided into 3 groups: open Soave (OS, n = 13), transanal Soave with routine laparoscopic visualization (LVS, n = 9), and transanal Soave with selective laparoscopy or minilaparotomy (TAS, n = 15). Cost was calculated based on hospital stay, operating room time, and use of laparoscopic equipment. Results: In the TAS group, suspicion of a longer segment led to the selective use of laparoscopy with or without biopsy in 2 children, and the use of a small umbilical incision for mobilization of the splenic flexure in 2. There were no differences among groups with respect to age, weight, gender, transition zone, operating time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, enterocolitis, or stricture or cuff narrowing. Hospital stay was significantly longer in the OS group (median, 7 days; range, 3 to 47) than the LVS (median, 1; range 1 to 6) or TAS (median, 1, range, 1 to 3) groups. Cost (in thousands of dollars) was also higher in the OS group (median, 6.9; range, 3.9-25.7) than the LVS (median, 3.9; range, 3.6 to 6.4) or TAS (median, 3.4; range, 2.2 to 9.4) groups. Repeat surgery was necessary for 4 OS patients: 2 adhesive small bowel obstructions (1 of whom died), 1 twisted pull-through, and 1 recurrent aganglionosis. Three TAS patients required repeat surgery: 1 twisted pull-through, 1 anastomotic leak, and 1 cuff narrowing. Conclusions: These data suggest that the transanal pull-through is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay and lower cost than the open approach, without an increased risk of complications. Because there is no intraabdominal dissection, there probably is a lower incidence of adhesive bowel obstruction. Routine laparoscopic visualization or minilaparotomy is not necessary but should be used in children who are at higher risk for long segment disease. Copyright (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company.

KW - Complications

KW - Hirschsprung's disease

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Minimally invasive surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034119413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034119413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 820

EP - 822

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 6

ER -