Online personal medical records: Are they reliable for acute/critical care?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To provide an introduction to Internet-based Online Personal Medical Records (OPMRs), to assess their use and limitations in acute/critical care situations, and to identify potential improvements that could increase their usefulness. Design: A review of publicly available Internet-based OPMRs conducted in April 2001. Data Sources: Twenty-nine OPMR sites were identified in March 2000 using ten Internet search engines with the search term "Personal Medical Records." Through 2000 and 2001, an additional 37 sites were identified using lists obtained from trade journals and through the author's participation in standards-setting meetings. Measurements: Each publicly available site was reviewed to assess suitability for acute/critical care situations using four measures developed by the author and for general use using eight measures developed in a standards-setting process described in the article. Results: Of the 66 companies identified, only 16 still offer OPMRs that are available to the public on the Internet. None of these met all of the evaluation measures. Only 19% had rapid emergency access capabilities and only 63% provided medical summaries of the record. Security and confidentiality issues were well addressed in 94% of sites. Data portability was virtually nonexistent because all OPMRs lacked the ability to exchange data electronically with other OPMRs, and only two OPMRs permitted data transfer from physician electronic medical records. Controls over data accuracy were poor: 81% of sites allowed entry of dates for medical treatment before the patient's date of birth, and one site actually gave incorrect medical advice. OPMRs were periodically inaccessible because of programming deficiencies. Finally, approximately 40 sites ceased providing OPMRs in the past year, with the probable loss of patient information. Conclusions: Most OPMRs are not ready for use in acute/critical care situations. Many are just electronic versions of the paper-based health record notebooks that patients have used for years. They have, however, great promise and, with further development, could form the basis of a new medical record system that could contribute to improving the quality of medical care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume29
Issue number8 SUPPL.
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Personal Health Records
Critical Care
Internet
Medical Records
Search Engine
Aptitude
Electronic Health Records
Quality of Health Care
Information Storage and Retrieval
Confidentiality
Emergencies

Keywords

  • Confidentiality
  • Medical quality
  • Medical records
  • Online medical records
  • Personal medical records
  • Privacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Online personal medical records : Are they reliable for acute/critical care? / Schneider, J. H.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 8 SUPPL., 2001.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8cad4c9ce6b47528bb54f1148b5a26f,
title = "Online personal medical records: Are they reliable for acute/critical care?",
abstract = "Objective: To provide an introduction to Internet-based Online Personal Medical Records (OPMRs), to assess their use and limitations in acute/critical care situations, and to identify potential improvements that could increase their usefulness. Design: A review of publicly available Internet-based OPMRs conducted in April 2001. Data Sources: Twenty-nine OPMR sites were identified in March 2000 using ten Internet search engines with the search term {"}Personal Medical Records.{"} Through 2000 and 2001, an additional 37 sites were identified using lists obtained from trade journals and through the author's participation in standards-setting meetings. Measurements: Each publicly available site was reviewed to assess suitability for acute/critical care situations using four measures developed by the author and for general use using eight measures developed in a standards-setting process described in the article. Results: Of the 66 companies identified, only 16 still offer OPMRs that are available to the public on the Internet. None of these met all of the evaluation measures. Only 19{\%} had rapid emergency access capabilities and only 63{\%} provided medical summaries of the record. Security and confidentiality issues were well addressed in 94{\%} of sites. Data portability was virtually nonexistent because all OPMRs lacked the ability to exchange data electronically with other OPMRs, and only two OPMRs permitted data transfer from physician electronic medical records. Controls over data accuracy were poor: 81{\%} of sites allowed entry of dates for medical treatment before the patient's date of birth, and one site actually gave incorrect medical advice. OPMRs were periodically inaccessible because of programming deficiencies. Finally, approximately 40 sites ceased providing OPMRs in the past year, with the probable loss of patient information. Conclusions: Most OPMRs are not ready for use in acute/critical care situations. Many are just electronic versions of the paper-based health record notebooks that patients have used for years. They have, however, great promise and, with further development, could form the basis of a new medical record system that could contribute to improving the quality of medical care.",
keywords = "Confidentiality, Medical quality, Medical records, Online medical records, Personal medical records, Privacy",
author = "Schneider, {J. H.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Online personal medical records

T2 - Are they reliable for acute/critical care?

AU - Schneider, J. H.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objective: To provide an introduction to Internet-based Online Personal Medical Records (OPMRs), to assess their use and limitations in acute/critical care situations, and to identify potential improvements that could increase their usefulness. Design: A review of publicly available Internet-based OPMRs conducted in April 2001. Data Sources: Twenty-nine OPMR sites were identified in March 2000 using ten Internet search engines with the search term "Personal Medical Records." Through 2000 and 2001, an additional 37 sites were identified using lists obtained from trade journals and through the author's participation in standards-setting meetings. Measurements: Each publicly available site was reviewed to assess suitability for acute/critical care situations using four measures developed by the author and for general use using eight measures developed in a standards-setting process described in the article. Results: Of the 66 companies identified, only 16 still offer OPMRs that are available to the public on the Internet. None of these met all of the evaluation measures. Only 19% had rapid emergency access capabilities and only 63% provided medical summaries of the record. Security and confidentiality issues were well addressed in 94% of sites. Data portability was virtually nonexistent because all OPMRs lacked the ability to exchange data electronically with other OPMRs, and only two OPMRs permitted data transfer from physician electronic medical records. Controls over data accuracy were poor: 81% of sites allowed entry of dates for medical treatment before the patient's date of birth, and one site actually gave incorrect medical advice. OPMRs were periodically inaccessible because of programming deficiencies. Finally, approximately 40 sites ceased providing OPMRs in the past year, with the probable loss of patient information. Conclusions: Most OPMRs are not ready for use in acute/critical care situations. Many are just electronic versions of the paper-based health record notebooks that patients have used for years. They have, however, great promise and, with further development, could form the basis of a new medical record system that could contribute to improving the quality of medical care.

AB - Objective: To provide an introduction to Internet-based Online Personal Medical Records (OPMRs), to assess their use and limitations in acute/critical care situations, and to identify potential improvements that could increase their usefulness. Design: A review of publicly available Internet-based OPMRs conducted in April 2001. Data Sources: Twenty-nine OPMR sites were identified in March 2000 using ten Internet search engines with the search term "Personal Medical Records." Through 2000 and 2001, an additional 37 sites were identified using lists obtained from trade journals and through the author's participation in standards-setting meetings. Measurements: Each publicly available site was reviewed to assess suitability for acute/critical care situations using four measures developed by the author and for general use using eight measures developed in a standards-setting process described in the article. Results: Of the 66 companies identified, only 16 still offer OPMRs that are available to the public on the Internet. None of these met all of the evaluation measures. Only 19% had rapid emergency access capabilities and only 63% provided medical summaries of the record. Security and confidentiality issues were well addressed in 94% of sites. Data portability was virtually nonexistent because all OPMRs lacked the ability to exchange data electronically with other OPMRs, and only two OPMRs permitted data transfer from physician electronic medical records. Controls over data accuracy were poor: 81% of sites allowed entry of dates for medical treatment before the patient's date of birth, and one site actually gave incorrect medical advice. OPMRs were periodically inaccessible because of programming deficiencies. Finally, approximately 40 sites ceased providing OPMRs in the past year, with the probable loss of patient information. Conclusions: Most OPMRs are not ready for use in acute/critical care situations. Many are just electronic versions of the paper-based health record notebooks that patients have used for years. They have, however, great promise and, with further development, could form the basis of a new medical record system that could contribute to improving the quality of medical care.

KW - Confidentiality

KW - Medical quality

KW - Medical records

KW - Online medical records

KW - Personal medical records

KW - Privacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034863621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034863621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11496043

AN - SCOPUS:0034863621

VL - 29

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 8 SUPPL.

ER -