Optimal timing of acustimulation for antiemetic prophylaxis as an adjunct to ondansetron in patients undergoing plastic surgery

Paul F. White, Mohamed A. Hamza, Alejandro Recart, Jayne E. Coleman, Amy R. Macaluso, Lyndsey Cox, Omar Jaffer, Dajun Song, Rod Rohrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We designed this study to evaluate the antiemetic efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation in combination with ondansetron when applied before, after, or both before and after plastic surgery. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study design was used to compare three prophylactic acustimulation treatment schedules: preoperative-an active device was applied for 30 min before and a sham device for 72 h after surgery; postoperative-a sham device was applied for 30 min before and an active device for 72 h after surgery; and perioperative-an active device was applied for 30 min before and 72 h after surgery (n = 35 per group). All patients received a standardized general anesthetic, and ondansetron 4 mg IV was administered at the end of surgery. The incidence of vomiting/retching and the need for rescue antiemetics were determined at specific time intervals for up to 72 h after surgery. Nausea scores were recorded with an 11-point verbal rating scale. Other outcome variables assessed included discharge times (for outpatients), resumption of normal activities of daily living, complete antiemetic response rate, and patient satisfaction with antiemetic therapy and quality of recovery. Perioperative use of the ReliefBand® significantly increased complete responses (68%) compared with use of the device before surgery only (43%). Median postoperative nausea scores were significantly reduced in the peri- and post-operative (versus preoperative) treatment groups. Finally, patient satisfaction with the quality of recovery (83 ± 16 and 85 ± 13 vs 72 ± 18) and antiemetic management (96 ± 9 and 94 ± 10 vs 86 ± 13) on an arbitrary scale from 0 = worst to 100 = best was significantly higher in the groups receiving peri- or postoperative (versus preoperative) acustimulation therapy. For patients discharged on the day of surgery, the time to home readiness was significantly reduced (114 ± 41 min versus 164 ± 50 min; P < 0.05) when acustimulation was administered perioperatively (versus preoperatively). In conclusion, acustimulation with the ReliefBand® was most effective in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting and improving patients' satisfaction with their antiemetic therapy when it was administered after surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-372
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume100
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2005

Fingerprint

Ondansetron
Antiemetics
Plastic Surgery
Equipment and Supplies
Patient Satisfaction
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Therapeutics
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Acupuncture Points
General Anesthetics
Activities of Daily Living
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Nausea
Vomiting
Appointments and Schedules
Outpatients
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Optimal timing of acustimulation for antiemetic prophylaxis as an adjunct to ondansetron in patients undergoing plastic surgery. / White, Paul F.; Hamza, Mohamed A.; Recart, Alejandro; Coleman, Jayne E.; Macaluso, Amy R.; Cox, Lyndsey; Jaffer, Omar; Song, Dajun; Rohrich, Rod.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 100, No. 2, 02.2005, p. 367-372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

White, Paul F. ; Hamza, Mohamed A. ; Recart, Alejandro ; Coleman, Jayne E. ; Macaluso, Amy R. ; Cox, Lyndsey ; Jaffer, Omar ; Song, Dajun ; Rohrich, Rod. / Optimal timing of acustimulation for antiemetic prophylaxis as an adjunct to ondansetron in patients undergoing plastic surgery. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2005 ; Vol. 100, No. 2. pp. 367-372.
@article{8d2999ff5dc846518f7edaa9e31bcdcd,
title = "Optimal timing of acustimulation for antiemetic prophylaxis as an adjunct to ondansetron in patients undergoing plastic surgery",
abstract = "We designed this study to evaluate the antiemetic efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation in combination with ondansetron when applied before, after, or both before and after plastic surgery. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study design was used to compare three prophylactic acustimulation treatment schedules: preoperative-an active device was applied for 30 min before and a sham device for 72 h after surgery; postoperative-a sham device was applied for 30 min before and an active device for 72 h after surgery; and perioperative-an active device was applied for 30 min before and 72 h after surgery (n = 35 per group). All patients received a standardized general anesthetic, and ondansetron 4 mg IV was administered at the end of surgery. The incidence of vomiting/retching and the need for rescue antiemetics were determined at specific time intervals for up to 72 h after surgery. Nausea scores were recorded with an 11-point verbal rating scale. Other outcome variables assessed included discharge times (for outpatients), resumption of normal activities of daily living, complete antiemetic response rate, and patient satisfaction with antiemetic therapy and quality of recovery. Perioperative use of the ReliefBand{\circledR} significantly increased complete responses (68{\%}) compared with use of the device before surgery only (43{\%}). Median postoperative nausea scores were significantly reduced in the peri- and post-operative (versus preoperative) treatment groups. Finally, patient satisfaction with the quality of recovery (83 ± 16 and 85 ± 13 vs 72 ± 18) and antiemetic management (96 ± 9 and 94 ± 10 vs 86 ± 13) on an arbitrary scale from 0 = worst to 100 = best was significantly higher in the groups receiving peri- or postoperative (versus preoperative) acustimulation therapy. For patients discharged on the day of surgery, the time to home readiness was significantly reduced (114 ± 41 min versus 164 ± 50 min; P < 0.05) when acustimulation was administered perioperatively (versus preoperatively). In conclusion, acustimulation with the ReliefBand{\circledR} was most effective in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting and improving patients' satisfaction with their antiemetic therapy when it was administered after surgery.",
author = "White, {Paul F.} and Hamza, {Mohamed A.} and Alejandro Recart and Coleman, {Jayne E.} and Macaluso, {Amy R.} and Lyndsey Cox and Omar Jaffer and Dajun Song and Rod Rohrich",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1213/01.ANE.0000144425.16116.0A",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "367--372",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal timing of acustimulation for antiemetic prophylaxis as an adjunct to ondansetron in patients undergoing plastic surgery

AU - White, Paul F.

AU - Hamza, Mohamed A.

AU - Recart, Alejandro

AU - Coleman, Jayne E.

AU - Macaluso, Amy R.

AU - Cox, Lyndsey

AU - Jaffer, Omar

AU - Song, Dajun

AU - Rohrich, Rod

PY - 2005/2

Y1 - 2005/2

N2 - We designed this study to evaluate the antiemetic efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation in combination with ondansetron when applied before, after, or both before and after plastic surgery. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study design was used to compare three prophylactic acustimulation treatment schedules: preoperative-an active device was applied for 30 min before and a sham device for 72 h after surgery; postoperative-a sham device was applied for 30 min before and an active device for 72 h after surgery; and perioperative-an active device was applied for 30 min before and 72 h after surgery (n = 35 per group). All patients received a standardized general anesthetic, and ondansetron 4 mg IV was administered at the end of surgery. The incidence of vomiting/retching and the need for rescue antiemetics were determined at specific time intervals for up to 72 h after surgery. Nausea scores were recorded with an 11-point verbal rating scale. Other outcome variables assessed included discharge times (for outpatients), resumption of normal activities of daily living, complete antiemetic response rate, and patient satisfaction with antiemetic therapy and quality of recovery. Perioperative use of the ReliefBand® significantly increased complete responses (68%) compared with use of the device before surgery only (43%). Median postoperative nausea scores were significantly reduced in the peri- and post-operative (versus preoperative) treatment groups. Finally, patient satisfaction with the quality of recovery (83 ± 16 and 85 ± 13 vs 72 ± 18) and antiemetic management (96 ± 9 and 94 ± 10 vs 86 ± 13) on an arbitrary scale from 0 = worst to 100 = best was significantly higher in the groups receiving peri- or postoperative (versus preoperative) acustimulation therapy. For patients discharged on the day of surgery, the time to home readiness was significantly reduced (114 ± 41 min versus 164 ± 50 min; P < 0.05) when acustimulation was administered perioperatively (versus preoperatively). In conclusion, acustimulation with the ReliefBand® was most effective in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting and improving patients' satisfaction with their antiemetic therapy when it was administered after surgery.

AB - We designed this study to evaluate the antiemetic efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation in combination with ondansetron when applied before, after, or both before and after plastic surgery. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study design was used to compare three prophylactic acustimulation treatment schedules: preoperative-an active device was applied for 30 min before and a sham device for 72 h after surgery; postoperative-a sham device was applied for 30 min before and an active device for 72 h after surgery; and perioperative-an active device was applied for 30 min before and 72 h after surgery (n = 35 per group). All patients received a standardized general anesthetic, and ondansetron 4 mg IV was administered at the end of surgery. The incidence of vomiting/retching and the need for rescue antiemetics were determined at specific time intervals for up to 72 h after surgery. Nausea scores were recorded with an 11-point verbal rating scale. Other outcome variables assessed included discharge times (for outpatients), resumption of normal activities of daily living, complete antiemetic response rate, and patient satisfaction with antiemetic therapy and quality of recovery. Perioperative use of the ReliefBand® significantly increased complete responses (68%) compared with use of the device before surgery only (43%). Median postoperative nausea scores were significantly reduced in the peri- and post-operative (versus preoperative) treatment groups. Finally, patient satisfaction with the quality of recovery (83 ± 16 and 85 ± 13 vs 72 ± 18) and antiemetic management (96 ± 9 and 94 ± 10 vs 86 ± 13) on an arbitrary scale from 0 = worst to 100 = best was significantly higher in the groups receiving peri- or postoperative (versus preoperative) acustimulation therapy. For patients discharged on the day of surgery, the time to home readiness was significantly reduced (114 ± 41 min versus 164 ± 50 min; P < 0.05) when acustimulation was administered perioperatively (versus preoperatively). In conclusion, acustimulation with the ReliefBand® was most effective in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting and improving patients' satisfaction with their antiemetic therapy when it was administered after surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12844266803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12844266803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/01.ANE.0000144425.16116.0A

DO - 10.1213/01.ANE.0000144425.16116.0A

M3 - Article

C2 - 15673859

AN - SCOPUS:12844266803

VL - 100

SP - 367

EP - 372

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 2

ER -