Optimizing breast-pocket irrigation: The post-Betadine era

Jr Adams W.P., W. C H Conner, Jr Barton F.E., R. J. Rohrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The practice of breast-pocket irrigation with various antibiotic solutions is supported by good literature and extensive clinical practice among most plastic surgeons. Unfortunately, recent restrictions on the use of Betadine (povidone-iodine) for breast-pocket irrigation have left many plastic surgeons confused regarding their surgical protocol for aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine the in vitro efficacy of alternative non-Betadine-containing solutions for breast-pocket irrigation and to subsequently provide recommendations for breast-pocket irrigation in the "post-Betadine era." Bacitracin, cefazolin, gentamicin, and vancomycin were tested as single agents and in combination against organisms that have been most commonly cultured around breast implants and implicated in capsular contracture and peri-procedural infection. An established in vitro method was used for this testing. The single antibiotic agents were ineffective at controlling many of the bacteria tested. The combinations of bacitracin, cefazolin, and gentamicin, and vancomycin, cefazolin, and gentamicin both demonstrated excellent control of all the bacteria, except for allowing a 9 percent and a 6 percent growth of Pseudomonas, respectively. It was concluded that a combination breast irrigant of bacitracin, cefazolin, and gentamicin is an effective alternative to Betadine-containing breast irrigants and is recommended for clinical practice. Clinical implications are discussed in greater detail in the study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1596-1601
Number of pages6
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume107
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Povidone-Iodine
Breast
Cefazolin
Gentamicins
Bacitracin
Vancomycin
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Bacteria
Breast Implants
Contracture
Pseudomonas
Esthetics
Growth
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Optimizing breast-pocket irrigation : The post-Betadine era. / Adams W.P., Jr; Conner, W. C H; Barton F.E., Jr; Rohrich, R. J.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 107, No. 6, 2001, p. 1596-1601.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c88efbca9aea4e08a7573f6266112e0a,
title = "Optimizing breast-pocket irrigation: The post-Betadine era",
abstract = "The practice of breast-pocket irrigation with various antibiotic solutions is supported by good literature and extensive clinical practice among most plastic surgeons. Unfortunately, recent restrictions on the use of Betadine (povidone-iodine) for breast-pocket irrigation have left many plastic surgeons confused regarding their surgical protocol for aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine the in vitro efficacy of alternative non-Betadine-containing solutions for breast-pocket irrigation and to subsequently provide recommendations for breast-pocket irrigation in the {"}post-Betadine era.{"} Bacitracin, cefazolin, gentamicin, and vancomycin were tested as single agents and in combination against organisms that have been most commonly cultured around breast implants and implicated in capsular contracture and peri-procedural infection. An established in vitro method was used for this testing. The single antibiotic agents were ineffective at controlling many of the bacteria tested. The combinations of bacitracin, cefazolin, and gentamicin, and vancomycin, cefazolin, and gentamicin both demonstrated excellent control of all the bacteria, except for allowing a 9 percent and a 6 percent growth of Pseudomonas, respectively. It was concluded that a combination breast irrigant of bacitracin, cefazolin, and gentamicin is an effective alternative to Betadine-containing breast irrigants and is recommended for clinical practice. Clinical implications are discussed in greater detail in the study.",
author = "{Adams W.P.}, Jr and Conner, {W. C H} and {Barton F.E.}, Jr and Rohrich, {R. J.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "1596--1601",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing breast-pocket irrigation

T2 - The post-Betadine era

AU - Adams W.P., Jr

AU - Conner, W. C H

AU - Barton F.E., Jr

AU - Rohrich, R. J.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The practice of breast-pocket irrigation with various antibiotic solutions is supported by good literature and extensive clinical practice among most plastic surgeons. Unfortunately, recent restrictions on the use of Betadine (povidone-iodine) for breast-pocket irrigation have left many plastic surgeons confused regarding their surgical protocol for aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine the in vitro efficacy of alternative non-Betadine-containing solutions for breast-pocket irrigation and to subsequently provide recommendations for breast-pocket irrigation in the "post-Betadine era." Bacitracin, cefazolin, gentamicin, and vancomycin were tested as single agents and in combination against organisms that have been most commonly cultured around breast implants and implicated in capsular contracture and peri-procedural infection. An established in vitro method was used for this testing. The single antibiotic agents were ineffective at controlling many of the bacteria tested. The combinations of bacitracin, cefazolin, and gentamicin, and vancomycin, cefazolin, and gentamicin both demonstrated excellent control of all the bacteria, except for allowing a 9 percent and a 6 percent growth of Pseudomonas, respectively. It was concluded that a combination breast irrigant of bacitracin, cefazolin, and gentamicin is an effective alternative to Betadine-containing breast irrigants and is recommended for clinical practice. Clinical implications are discussed in greater detail in the study.

AB - The practice of breast-pocket irrigation with various antibiotic solutions is supported by good literature and extensive clinical practice among most plastic surgeons. Unfortunately, recent restrictions on the use of Betadine (povidone-iodine) for breast-pocket irrigation have left many plastic surgeons confused regarding their surgical protocol for aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine the in vitro efficacy of alternative non-Betadine-containing solutions for breast-pocket irrigation and to subsequently provide recommendations for breast-pocket irrigation in the "post-Betadine era." Bacitracin, cefazolin, gentamicin, and vancomycin were tested as single agents and in combination against organisms that have been most commonly cultured around breast implants and implicated in capsular contracture and peri-procedural infection. An established in vitro method was used for this testing. The single antibiotic agents were ineffective at controlling many of the bacteria tested. The combinations of bacitracin, cefazolin, and gentamicin, and vancomycin, cefazolin, and gentamicin both demonstrated excellent control of all the bacteria, except for allowing a 9 percent and a 6 percent growth of Pseudomonas, respectively. It was concluded that a combination breast irrigant of bacitracin, cefazolin, and gentamicin is an effective alternative to Betadine-containing breast irrigants and is recommended for clinical practice. Clinical implications are discussed in greater detail in the study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035028311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035028311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11360897

AN - SCOPUS:0035028311

VL - 107

SP - 1596

EP - 1601

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 6

ER -