Original smooth receiver operating characteristic curve estimation from continuous data: Statistical methods for analyzing the predictive value of spiral CT of ureteral stones

K. H. Zou, C. M. Tempany, J. R. Fielding, S. G. Silverman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives. Diagnostic studies such as spiral computed tomography (CT) in patients with obstructing ureteral calculi often necessitate the analysis of continuous test data (eg, stone sizes). The accuracy of a test can be summarized by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The authors developed and compared three methods for constructing a smooth ROC curve from continuous diagnostic data: Materials and Methods. Nonparametric, semiparametric, and parametric smooth ROC curve analyses were applied to data from 100 unenhanced spiral CT scans of patients with proved obstructing ureteral stones. Accuracy in using stone size to predict the need for intervention was evaluated by means of these methods. Characteristics and summary measures of the resulting ROC curves were estimated. Results. All methods fit the data well. The nonparametric method followed the details of the empiric data. The semiparametric and parametric methods yielded similar estimates of the ROC curve parameters. Areas under the ROC curves were 0.807, 0.821, and 0.814 for nonparametric, semiparametric and parametric methods, respectively, in comparison with 0.811 for the empiric method. Conclusions. The parametric method is preferred for constructing a smooth ROC curve with available stone-size data derived from spiral CT. The analyses confirm the predictive value of stone size in determining the need for intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)680-687
Number of pages8
JournalAcademic Radiology
Volume5
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Spiral Computed Tomography
ROC Curve
Ureteral Calculi

Keywords

  • Genitourinary system, calculi
  • Genitourinary system, CT
  • Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)
  • Statistical analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Original smooth receiver operating characteristic curve estimation from continuous data : Statistical methods for analyzing the predictive value of spiral CT of ureteral stones. / Zou, K. H.; Tempany, C. M.; Fielding, J. R.; Silverman, S. G.

In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 5, No. 10, 01.01.1998, p. 680-687.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7b116e9f8e674dd4b9b753409ba16638,
title = "Original smooth receiver operating characteristic curve estimation from continuous data: Statistical methods for analyzing the predictive value of spiral CT of ureteral stones",
abstract = "Rationale and Objectives. Diagnostic studies such as spiral computed tomography (CT) in patients with obstructing ureteral calculi often necessitate the analysis of continuous test data (eg, stone sizes). The accuracy of a test can be summarized by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The authors developed and compared three methods for constructing a smooth ROC curve from continuous diagnostic data: Materials and Methods. Nonparametric, semiparametric, and parametric smooth ROC curve analyses were applied to data from 100 unenhanced spiral CT scans of patients with proved obstructing ureteral stones. Accuracy in using stone size to predict the need for intervention was evaluated by means of these methods. Characteristics and summary measures of the resulting ROC curves were estimated. Results. All methods fit the data well. The nonparametric method followed the details of the empiric data. The semiparametric and parametric methods yielded similar estimates of the ROC curve parameters. Areas under the ROC curves were 0.807, 0.821, and 0.814 for nonparametric, semiparametric and parametric methods, respectively, in comparison with 0.811 for the empiric method. Conclusions. The parametric method is preferred for constructing a smooth ROC curve with available stone-size data derived from spiral CT. The analyses confirm the predictive value of stone size in determining the need for intervention.",
keywords = "Genitourinary system, calculi, Genitourinary system, CT, Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), Statistical analysis",
author = "Zou, {K. H.} and Tempany, {C. M.} and Fielding, {J. R.} and Silverman, {S. G.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1076-6332(98)80562-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "680--687",
journal = "Academic Radiology",
issn = "1076-6332",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Original smooth receiver operating characteristic curve estimation from continuous data

T2 - Statistical methods for analyzing the predictive value of spiral CT of ureteral stones

AU - Zou, K. H.

AU - Tempany, C. M.

AU - Fielding, J. R.

AU - Silverman, S. G.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Rationale and Objectives. Diagnostic studies such as spiral computed tomography (CT) in patients with obstructing ureteral calculi often necessitate the analysis of continuous test data (eg, stone sizes). The accuracy of a test can be summarized by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The authors developed and compared three methods for constructing a smooth ROC curve from continuous diagnostic data: Materials and Methods. Nonparametric, semiparametric, and parametric smooth ROC curve analyses were applied to data from 100 unenhanced spiral CT scans of patients with proved obstructing ureteral stones. Accuracy in using stone size to predict the need for intervention was evaluated by means of these methods. Characteristics and summary measures of the resulting ROC curves were estimated. Results. All methods fit the data well. The nonparametric method followed the details of the empiric data. The semiparametric and parametric methods yielded similar estimates of the ROC curve parameters. Areas under the ROC curves were 0.807, 0.821, and 0.814 for nonparametric, semiparametric and parametric methods, respectively, in comparison with 0.811 for the empiric method. Conclusions. The parametric method is preferred for constructing a smooth ROC curve with available stone-size data derived from spiral CT. The analyses confirm the predictive value of stone size in determining the need for intervention.

AB - Rationale and Objectives. Diagnostic studies such as spiral computed tomography (CT) in patients with obstructing ureteral calculi often necessitate the analysis of continuous test data (eg, stone sizes). The accuracy of a test can be summarized by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The authors developed and compared three methods for constructing a smooth ROC curve from continuous diagnostic data: Materials and Methods. Nonparametric, semiparametric, and parametric smooth ROC curve analyses were applied to data from 100 unenhanced spiral CT scans of patients with proved obstructing ureteral stones. Accuracy in using stone size to predict the need for intervention was evaluated by means of these methods. Characteristics and summary measures of the resulting ROC curves were estimated. Results. All methods fit the data well. The nonparametric method followed the details of the empiric data. The semiparametric and parametric methods yielded similar estimates of the ROC curve parameters. Areas under the ROC curves were 0.807, 0.821, and 0.814 for nonparametric, semiparametric and parametric methods, respectively, in comparison with 0.811 for the empiric method. Conclusions. The parametric method is preferred for constructing a smooth ROC curve with available stone-size data derived from spiral CT. The analyses confirm the predictive value of stone size in determining the need for intervention.

KW - Genitourinary system, calculi

KW - Genitourinary system, CT

KW - Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)

KW - Statistical analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032417747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032417747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1076-6332(98)80562-X

DO - 10.1016/S1076-6332(98)80562-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 9787838

AN - SCOPUS:0032417747

VL - 5

SP - 680

EP - 687

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

IS - 10

ER -