Outpatient diagnosis and clinical presentation of bipolar youth

Kirti Saxena, Paul A. Nakonezny, Alex Simmons, Taryn Mayes, Annie Walley, Graham Emslie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Many children and adolescents in the community do not fit the classic Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for Bipolar Disorder, Type I., and bipolar disorder, not otherwise specified (BPNOS) is often the "catch all" diagnosis. Significant research has been conducted to better understand the phenomenology of the spectrum of bipolar disorder; however, there are presently different operational definitions for bipolar disorder, in both clinical and research settings. A recent study, The Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth (COBY) provided preliminary validation for diagnosing BPNOS. Using these COBY research definitions for BPNOS, we examined the clinical presentation and the prior history of psychotropic medication usage of youth with BPI vs. BPNOS presenting to an outpatient clinic. Methods: The initial evaluation consisted of a direct clinical interview with the parent(s) and the patient. Standardized rating scales such as the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms were used to assess current mood states. The Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity was used to assess the overall functioning of bipolar youth. Results: Age, comorbidities, and family histories of 68 bipolar youth in the clinic are similar to what other studies have reported. BPNOS youth have significant functional impairment which is comparable to the BPI youth. Both bipolar groups are equally likely to have similar prior exposure to psychotropic medications. Discussion: BPNOS is a serious illness the diagnostic guidelines for which are still debatable. Until further clarification of this diagnosis, the COBY definitions for BPNOS can be used in a clinic. The use of stringent criteria for diagnosing the bipolar spectrum disorders allows for careful differential diagnoses of psychiatric illnesses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-220
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume18
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Bipolar Disorder
Outpatients
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Research
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Psychiatry
Comorbidity
Differential Diagnosis
History
Guidelines
Interviews
Depression
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Bipolar
  • Diagnosis
  • Outpatient

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Outpatient diagnosis and clinical presentation of bipolar youth. / Saxena, Kirti; Nakonezny, Paul A.; Simmons, Alex; Mayes, Taryn; Walley, Annie; Emslie, Graham.

In: Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2009, p. 215-220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b0a7f31df42e4ab5925cfb6397aae14b,
title = "Outpatient diagnosis and clinical presentation of bipolar youth",
abstract = "Introduction: Many children and adolescents in the community do not fit the classic Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for Bipolar Disorder, Type I., and bipolar disorder, not otherwise specified (BPNOS) is often the {"}catch all{"} diagnosis. Significant research has been conducted to better understand the phenomenology of the spectrum of bipolar disorder; however, there are presently different operational definitions for bipolar disorder, in both clinical and research settings. A recent study, The Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth (COBY) provided preliminary validation for diagnosing BPNOS. Using these COBY research definitions for BPNOS, we examined the clinical presentation and the prior history of psychotropic medication usage of youth with BPI vs. BPNOS presenting to an outpatient clinic. Methods: The initial evaluation consisted of a direct clinical interview with the parent(s) and the patient. Standardized rating scales such as the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms were used to assess current mood states. The Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity was used to assess the overall functioning of bipolar youth. Results: Age, comorbidities, and family histories of 68 bipolar youth in the clinic are similar to what other studies have reported. BPNOS youth have significant functional impairment which is comparable to the BPI youth. Both bipolar groups are equally likely to have similar prior exposure to psychotropic medications. Discussion: BPNOS is a serious illness the diagnostic guidelines for which are still debatable. Until further clarification of this diagnosis, the COBY definitions for BPNOS can be used in a clinic. The use of stringent criteria for diagnosing the bipolar spectrum disorders allows for careful differential diagnoses of psychiatric illnesses.",
keywords = "Bipolar, Diagnosis, Outpatient",
author = "Kirti Saxena and Nakonezny, {Paul A.} and Alex Simmons and Taryn Mayes and Annie Walley and Graham Emslie",
year = "2009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "215--220",
journal = "Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry",
issn = "1719-8429",
publisher = "Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outpatient diagnosis and clinical presentation of bipolar youth

AU - Saxena, Kirti

AU - Nakonezny, Paul A.

AU - Simmons, Alex

AU - Mayes, Taryn

AU - Walley, Annie

AU - Emslie, Graham

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Introduction: Many children and adolescents in the community do not fit the classic Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for Bipolar Disorder, Type I., and bipolar disorder, not otherwise specified (BPNOS) is often the "catch all" diagnosis. Significant research has been conducted to better understand the phenomenology of the spectrum of bipolar disorder; however, there are presently different operational definitions for bipolar disorder, in both clinical and research settings. A recent study, The Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth (COBY) provided preliminary validation for diagnosing BPNOS. Using these COBY research definitions for BPNOS, we examined the clinical presentation and the prior history of psychotropic medication usage of youth with BPI vs. BPNOS presenting to an outpatient clinic. Methods: The initial evaluation consisted of a direct clinical interview with the parent(s) and the patient. Standardized rating scales such as the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms were used to assess current mood states. The Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity was used to assess the overall functioning of bipolar youth. Results: Age, comorbidities, and family histories of 68 bipolar youth in the clinic are similar to what other studies have reported. BPNOS youth have significant functional impairment which is comparable to the BPI youth. Both bipolar groups are equally likely to have similar prior exposure to psychotropic medications. Discussion: BPNOS is a serious illness the diagnostic guidelines for which are still debatable. Until further clarification of this diagnosis, the COBY definitions for BPNOS can be used in a clinic. The use of stringent criteria for diagnosing the bipolar spectrum disorders allows for careful differential diagnoses of psychiatric illnesses.

AB - Introduction: Many children and adolescents in the community do not fit the classic Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for Bipolar Disorder, Type I., and bipolar disorder, not otherwise specified (BPNOS) is often the "catch all" diagnosis. Significant research has been conducted to better understand the phenomenology of the spectrum of bipolar disorder; however, there are presently different operational definitions for bipolar disorder, in both clinical and research settings. A recent study, The Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth (COBY) provided preliminary validation for diagnosing BPNOS. Using these COBY research definitions for BPNOS, we examined the clinical presentation and the prior history of psychotropic medication usage of youth with BPI vs. BPNOS presenting to an outpatient clinic. Methods: The initial evaluation consisted of a direct clinical interview with the parent(s) and the patient. Standardized rating scales such as the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms were used to assess current mood states. The Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity was used to assess the overall functioning of bipolar youth. Results: Age, comorbidities, and family histories of 68 bipolar youth in the clinic are similar to what other studies have reported. BPNOS youth have significant functional impairment which is comparable to the BPI youth. Both bipolar groups are equally likely to have similar prior exposure to psychotropic medications. Discussion: BPNOS is a serious illness the diagnostic guidelines for which are still debatable. Until further clarification of this diagnosis, the COBY definitions for BPNOS can be used in a clinic. The use of stringent criteria for diagnosing the bipolar spectrum disorders allows for careful differential diagnoses of psychiatric illnesses.

KW - Bipolar

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Outpatient

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349189566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349189566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19718422

AN - SCOPUS:70349189566

VL - 18

SP - 215

EP - 220

JO - Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

JF - Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

SN - 1719-8429

IS - 3

ER -