Pain Management for Ambulatory Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Evidence-Based Recommendations From the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia

Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ambulatory arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with moderate pain, even when nonopioid oral analgesics such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used. Regional analgesia can supplement nonopioid oral analgesics and reduce postoperative opioid requirements, but the choice of regional analgesia technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains controversial. Femoral nerve block, adductor canal block, and local instillation analgesia have all been proposed and are supported by some evidence from randomized controlled trials. Consequently, regional analgesia practice in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains mixed. Published systematic reviews were used to identify the regional analgesia modality that would provide a balance between analgesic efficacy and associated potential risks in the setting of nonopioid multimodal analgesic strategies. Based on the evidence available, local instillation analgesia provides the best balance of analgesic efficacy and associated risks (strong recommendation, moderate level of evidence) when used as a component of multimodal analgesic technique in the first 24 hours after outpatient arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In the absence of local instillation analgesia, clinicians might use adductor canal block or femoral nerve block (weak recommendation, weak level of evidence). These recommendations have been endorsed by the Society of Ambulatory Anesthesia and approved by its board of directors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)631-640
Number of pages10
JournalAnesthesia and analgesia
Volume128
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Pain Management
Analgesia
Anesthesia
Non-Narcotic Analgesics
Femoral Nerve
Analgesics
Nerve Block
Acetaminophen
Opioid Analgesics
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Outpatients
Randomized Controlled Trials
Pain
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Pain Management for Ambulatory Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction : Evidence-Based Recommendations From the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia. / Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA).

In: Anesthesia and analgesia, Vol. 128, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 631-640.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ecf223e7cb494bb29bc451a2c7a2ff17,
title = "Pain Management for Ambulatory Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evidence-Based Recommendations From the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia",
abstract = "Ambulatory arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with moderate pain, even when nonopioid oral analgesics such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used. Regional analgesia can supplement nonopioid oral analgesics and reduce postoperative opioid requirements, but the choice of regional analgesia technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains controversial. Femoral nerve block, adductor canal block, and local instillation analgesia have all been proposed and are supported by some evidence from randomized controlled trials. Consequently, regional analgesia practice in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains mixed. Published systematic reviews were used to identify the regional analgesia modality that would provide a balance between analgesic efficacy and associated potential risks in the setting of nonopioid multimodal analgesic strategies. Based on the evidence available, local instillation analgesia provides the best balance of analgesic efficacy and associated risks (strong recommendation, moderate level of evidence) when used as a component of multimodal analgesic technique in the first 24 hours after outpatient arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In the absence of local instillation analgesia, clinicians might use adductor canal block or femoral nerve block (weak recommendation, weak level of evidence). These recommendations have been endorsed by the Society of Ambulatory Anesthesia and approved by its board of directors.",
author = "{Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA)} and Abdallah, {Faraj W.} and Richard Brull and Joshi, {Girish P}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1213/ANE.0000000000003976",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "128",
pages = "631--640",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pain Management for Ambulatory Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

T2 - Evidence-Based Recommendations From the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia

AU - Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA)

AU - Abdallah, Faraj W.

AU - Brull, Richard

AU - Joshi, Girish P

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Ambulatory arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with moderate pain, even when nonopioid oral analgesics such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used. Regional analgesia can supplement nonopioid oral analgesics and reduce postoperative opioid requirements, but the choice of regional analgesia technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains controversial. Femoral nerve block, adductor canal block, and local instillation analgesia have all been proposed and are supported by some evidence from randomized controlled trials. Consequently, regional analgesia practice in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains mixed. Published systematic reviews were used to identify the regional analgesia modality that would provide a balance between analgesic efficacy and associated potential risks in the setting of nonopioid multimodal analgesic strategies. Based on the evidence available, local instillation analgesia provides the best balance of analgesic efficacy and associated risks (strong recommendation, moderate level of evidence) when used as a component of multimodal analgesic technique in the first 24 hours after outpatient arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In the absence of local instillation analgesia, clinicians might use adductor canal block or femoral nerve block (weak recommendation, weak level of evidence). These recommendations have been endorsed by the Society of Ambulatory Anesthesia and approved by its board of directors.

AB - Ambulatory arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with moderate pain, even when nonopioid oral analgesics such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used. Regional analgesia can supplement nonopioid oral analgesics and reduce postoperative opioid requirements, but the choice of regional analgesia technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains controversial. Femoral nerve block, adductor canal block, and local instillation analgesia have all been proposed and are supported by some evidence from randomized controlled trials. Consequently, regional analgesia practice in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains mixed. Published systematic reviews were used to identify the regional analgesia modality that would provide a balance between analgesic efficacy and associated potential risks in the setting of nonopioid multimodal analgesic strategies. Based on the evidence available, local instillation analgesia provides the best balance of analgesic efficacy and associated risks (strong recommendation, moderate level of evidence) when used as a component of multimodal analgesic technique in the first 24 hours after outpatient arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In the absence of local instillation analgesia, clinicians might use adductor canal block or femoral nerve block (weak recommendation, weak level of evidence). These recommendations have been endorsed by the Society of Ambulatory Anesthesia and approved by its board of directors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063294655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063294655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003976

DO - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003976

M3 - Article

VL - 128

SP - 631

EP - 640

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 4

ER -