Pain management strategies for urogynecologic surgery

A review

Sarah A. Collins, Girish Joshi, Lieschen H. Quiroz, Adam C. Steinberg, Mikio A. Nihira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to review the recent literature on surgical pain management strategies and to identify those pertinent to urogynecologic surgery. Methods: A literature search using Pubmed and MEDLINE was performed for trials on pain management in gynecologic surgery. Evidenced-based recommendations for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pain control strategies for gynecologic procedures by various surgical routes were identified. Articles specifically describing urogynecologic procedures were sought, but quality, randomized trials on pain management modalities in other gynecologic procedures were also included. Results: Although few randomized trials on pain management strategies in urogynecologic surgery exist, quality evidence suggests that several preemptive and multimodal analgesia strategies reduce pain and opioid-related adverse events in abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgery. Evidence supporting these strategies is outlined. Many are likely applicable to urogynecologic procedures. Conclusions: Evidence guiding pain management in specific urogynecologic procedures is sparse and should be sought in future studies. When possible, procedure-specific strategies, including preemptive and multimodal techniques, should be implemented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)310-315
Number of pages6
JournalFemale Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Pain Management
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Postoperative Pain
PubMed
MEDLINE
Laparoscopy
Analgesia
Opioid Analgesics
Pain

Keywords

  • Analgesia
  • Gynecologic surgery
  • Multimodal analgesia
  • Pain management
  • Postoperative pain
  • Preemptive analgesia
  • Urogynecologic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Surgery
  • Urology

Cite this

Pain management strategies for urogynecologic surgery : A review. / Collins, Sarah A.; Joshi, Girish; Quiroz, Lieschen H.; Steinberg, Adam C.; Nihira, Mikio A.

In: Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2014, p. 310-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Collins, Sarah A. ; Joshi, Girish ; Quiroz, Lieschen H. ; Steinberg, Adam C. ; Nihira, Mikio A. / Pain management strategies for urogynecologic surgery : A review. In: Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 310-315.
@article{bb4307d81093423288be952c26d35450,
title = "Pain management strategies for urogynecologic surgery: A review",
abstract = "Objectives: The objectives of this study were to review the recent literature on surgical pain management strategies and to identify those pertinent to urogynecologic surgery. Methods: A literature search using Pubmed and MEDLINE was performed for trials on pain management in gynecologic surgery. Evidenced-based recommendations for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pain control strategies for gynecologic procedures by various surgical routes were identified. Articles specifically describing urogynecologic procedures were sought, but quality, randomized trials on pain management modalities in other gynecologic procedures were also included. Results: Although few randomized trials on pain management strategies in urogynecologic surgery exist, quality evidence suggests that several preemptive and multimodal analgesia strategies reduce pain and opioid-related adverse events in abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgery. Evidence supporting these strategies is outlined. Many are likely applicable to urogynecologic procedures. Conclusions: Evidence guiding pain management in specific urogynecologic procedures is sparse and should be sought in future studies. When possible, procedure-specific strategies, including preemptive and multimodal techniques, should be implemented.",
keywords = "Analgesia, Gynecologic surgery, Multimodal analgesia, Pain management, Postoperative pain, Preemptive analgesia, Urogynecologic surgery",
author = "Collins, {Sarah A.} and Girish Joshi and Quiroz, {Lieschen H.} and Steinberg, {Adam C.} and Nihira, {Mikio A.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/SPV.0000000000000134",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "310--315",
journal = "Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "2151-8378",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pain management strategies for urogynecologic surgery

T2 - A review

AU - Collins, Sarah A.

AU - Joshi, Girish

AU - Quiroz, Lieschen H.

AU - Steinberg, Adam C.

AU - Nihira, Mikio A.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives: The objectives of this study were to review the recent literature on surgical pain management strategies and to identify those pertinent to urogynecologic surgery. Methods: A literature search using Pubmed and MEDLINE was performed for trials on pain management in gynecologic surgery. Evidenced-based recommendations for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pain control strategies for gynecologic procedures by various surgical routes were identified. Articles specifically describing urogynecologic procedures were sought, but quality, randomized trials on pain management modalities in other gynecologic procedures were also included. Results: Although few randomized trials on pain management strategies in urogynecologic surgery exist, quality evidence suggests that several preemptive and multimodal analgesia strategies reduce pain and opioid-related adverse events in abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgery. Evidence supporting these strategies is outlined. Many are likely applicable to urogynecologic procedures. Conclusions: Evidence guiding pain management in specific urogynecologic procedures is sparse and should be sought in future studies. When possible, procedure-specific strategies, including preemptive and multimodal techniques, should be implemented.

AB - Objectives: The objectives of this study were to review the recent literature on surgical pain management strategies and to identify those pertinent to urogynecologic surgery. Methods: A literature search using Pubmed and MEDLINE was performed for trials on pain management in gynecologic surgery. Evidenced-based recommendations for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pain control strategies for gynecologic procedures by various surgical routes were identified. Articles specifically describing urogynecologic procedures were sought, but quality, randomized trials on pain management modalities in other gynecologic procedures were also included. Results: Although few randomized trials on pain management strategies in urogynecologic surgery exist, quality evidence suggests that several preemptive and multimodal analgesia strategies reduce pain and opioid-related adverse events in abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgery. Evidence supporting these strategies is outlined. Many are likely applicable to urogynecologic procedures. Conclusions: Evidence guiding pain management in specific urogynecologic procedures is sparse and should be sought in future studies. When possible, procedure-specific strategies, including preemptive and multimodal techniques, should be implemented.

KW - Analgesia

KW - Gynecologic surgery

KW - Multimodal analgesia

KW - Pain management

KW - Postoperative pain

KW - Preemptive analgesia

KW - Urogynecologic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928107209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928107209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000134

DO - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000134

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 310

EP - 315

JO - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 2151-8378

IS - 6

ER -