Participant-proxy agreement on objective and subjective aspects of societal participation following traumatic brain injury

Tessa Hart, Mark Sherer, Nancy Temkin, John Whyte, Sureyya Dikmen, Allen W. Heinemann, Kathleen Bell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine congruence between participant (P) and significant other (SO) reports on societal participation in 3 objective domains (economic, community, and social activities) and subjective satisfaction with participation at 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants: Ninety-seven persons with moderate to severe TBI and their SOs (27 spouses/partners, 47 parents, 23 other relatives/friends). Main Outcome Measure: Community Participation Indicators questionnaire, divided into Objective (Economic, Community, Social) and Subjective (Satisfaction) subscales. Design: Prospective correlational study. Results: P-SO congruence differed by domain of participation, with Economic and Community indicators showing higher agreement than Social and Satisfaction items. Congruence was not affected by P-SO relationship or whether the pair lived together. However, pairs who spent at least daily time together had significantly higher agreement on Satisfaction items than pairs who were together less often. Congruence was not predicted by SOs self-reported degree of awareness of Ps concerns. Severity of TBI, within the range represented in this sample, had no effect on P-SO congruence in any domain. Conclusion: In research on participation after TBI, proxy report may be an acceptable substitute for missing participant report on productivity and community activity outcomes. However, proxy responses should be used with caution for questions about social activities and degree of satisfaction with participation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)339-348
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Proxy
Economics
Spouses
Parents
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Traumatic Brain Injury
Prospective Studies
Research

Keywords

  • participation
  • proxy report
  • traumatic brain injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Participant-proxy agreement on objective and subjective aspects of societal participation following traumatic brain injury. / Hart, Tessa; Sherer, Mark; Temkin, Nancy; Whyte, John; Dikmen, Sureyya; Heinemann, Allen W.; Bell, Kathleen.

In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, Vol. 25, No. 5, 09.2010, p. 339-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hart, Tessa ; Sherer, Mark ; Temkin, Nancy ; Whyte, John ; Dikmen, Sureyya ; Heinemann, Allen W. ; Bell, Kathleen. / Participant-proxy agreement on objective and subjective aspects of societal participation following traumatic brain injury. In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 5. pp. 339-348.
@article{3256b19883c4446a83b46add3dfb1c29,
title = "Participant-proxy agreement on objective and subjective aspects of societal participation following traumatic brain injury",
abstract = "Objective: To examine congruence between participant (P) and significant other (SO) reports on societal participation in 3 objective domains (economic, community, and social activities) and subjective satisfaction with participation at 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants: Ninety-seven persons with moderate to severe TBI and their SOs (27 spouses/partners, 47 parents, 23 other relatives/friends). Main Outcome Measure: Community Participation Indicators questionnaire, divided into Objective (Economic, Community, Social) and Subjective (Satisfaction) subscales. Design: Prospective correlational study. Results: P-SO congruence differed by domain of participation, with Economic and Community indicators showing higher agreement than Social and Satisfaction items. Congruence was not affected by P-SO relationship or whether the pair lived together. However, pairs who spent at least daily time together had significantly higher agreement on Satisfaction items than pairs who were together less often. Congruence was not predicted by SOs self-reported degree of awareness of Ps concerns. Severity of TBI, within the range represented in this sample, had no effect on P-SO congruence in any domain. Conclusion: In research on participation after TBI, proxy report may be an acceptable substitute for missing participant report on productivity and community activity outcomes. However, proxy responses should be used with caution for questions about social activities and degree of satisfaction with participation.",
keywords = "participation, proxy report, traumatic brain injury",
author = "Tessa Hart and Mark Sherer and Nancy Temkin and John Whyte and Sureyya Dikmen and Heinemann, {Allen W.} and Kathleen Bell",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181c7e60b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "339--348",
journal = "Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation",
issn = "0885-9701",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participant-proxy agreement on objective and subjective aspects of societal participation following traumatic brain injury

AU - Hart, Tessa

AU - Sherer, Mark

AU - Temkin, Nancy

AU - Whyte, John

AU - Dikmen, Sureyya

AU - Heinemann, Allen W.

AU - Bell, Kathleen

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Objective: To examine congruence between participant (P) and significant other (SO) reports on societal participation in 3 objective domains (economic, community, and social activities) and subjective satisfaction with participation at 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants: Ninety-seven persons with moderate to severe TBI and their SOs (27 spouses/partners, 47 parents, 23 other relatives/friends). Main Outcome Measure: Community Participation Indicators questionnaire, divided into Objective (Economic, Community, Social) and Subjective (Satisfaction) subscales. Design: Prospective correlational study. Results: P-SO congruence differed by domain of participation, with Economic and Community indicators showing higher agreement than Social and Satisfaction items. Congruence was not affected by P-SO relationship or whether the pair lived together. However, pairs who spent at least daily time together had significantly higher agreement on Satisfaction items than pairs who were together less often. Congruence was not predicted by SOs self-reported degree of awareness of Ps concerns. Severity of TBI, within the range represented in this sample, had no effect on P-SO congruence in any domain. Conclusion: In research on participation after TBI, proxy report may be an acceptable substitute for missing participant report on productivity and community activity outcomes. However, proxy responses should be used with caution for questions about social activities and degree of satisfaction with participation.

AB - Objective: To examine congruence between participant (P) and significant other (SO) reports on societal participation in 3 objective domains (economic, community, and social activities) and subjective satisfaction with participation at 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants: Ninety-seven persons with moderate to severe TBI and their SOs (27 spouses/partners, 47 parents, 23 other relatives/friends). Main Outcome Measure: Community Participation Indicators questionnaire, divided into Objective (Economic, Community, Social) and Subjective (Satisfaction) subscales. Design: Prospective correlational study. Results: P-SO congruence differed by domain of participation, with Economic and Community indicators showing higher agreement than Social and Satisfaction items. Congruence was not affected by P-SO relationship or whether the pair lived together. However, pairs who spent at least daily time together had significantly higher agreement on Satisfaction items than pairs who were together less often. Congruence was not predicted by SOs self-reported degree of awareness of Ps concerns. Severity of TBI, within the range represented in this sample, had no effect on P-SO congruence in any domain. Conclusion: In research on participation after TBI, proxy report may be an acceptable substitute for missing participant report on productivity and community activity outcomes. However, proxy responses should be used with caution for questions about social activities and degree of satisfaction with participation.

KW - participation

KW - proxy report

KW - traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957588320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957588320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181c7e60b

DO - 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181c7e60b

M3 - Article

C2 - 20042981

AN - SCOPUS:77957588320

VL - 25

SP - 339

EP - 348

JO - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

SN - 0885-9701

IS - 5

ER -