Pelvic floor disorders clinical trials: Participant recruitment and retention

Linda Brubaker, Holly E. Richter, Matthew D. Barber, Yvonne Hsu, David D. Rahn, Shawn Menefee, Anthony Visco, Cathie Spino, Susan Martin, Susan F. Meikle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: We used a focus-group methodology to gather information about women's knowledge and attitudes regarding research participation. Methods: Two in-person focus groups at seven clinical sites were conducted in women with pelvic floor disorder (PFD): one of women with clinical trial study experience and the other without such experience. One Web-based focus group combining both groups was also conducted. Results: One hundred and five women (average age 58.6 years) participated. Participants in both groups believed that their physicians were the best source of information about clinical trials yet felt that other sources of trial information were important. Financial compensation was not a primary motivating factor for PFD trial enrollment but was, however, cited as an important consideration. Internet collection of data was feasible and provided information comparable with in-person focus groups. Conclusions: This study identified central themes guiding successful recruitment to and retention in PFD-related trials and provided insight regarding strategies that may guide future trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)73-79
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Pelvic Floor Disorders
Focus Groups
Clinical Trials
Internet
Physicians
Research

Keywords

  • Focus group
  • Incentives
  • Pelvic floor disorders
  • Research
  • Web focus group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Pelvic floor disorders clinical trials : Participant recruitment and retention. / Brubaker, Linda; Richter, Holly E.; Barber, Matthew D.; Hsu, Yvonne; Rahn, David D.; Menefee, Shawn; Visco, Anthony; Spino, Cathie; Martin, Susan; Meikle, Susan F.

In: International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 73-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brubaker, L, Richter, HE, Barber, MD, Hsu, Y, Rahn, DD, Menefee, S, Visco, A, Spino, C, Martin, S & Meikle, SF 2013, 'Pelvic floor disorders clinical trials: Participant recruitment and retention', International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1824-x
Brubaker, Linda ; Richter, Holly E. ; Barber, Matthew D. ; Hsu, Yvonne ; Rahn, David D. ; Menefee, Shawn ; Visco, Anthony ; Spino, Cathie ; Martin, Susan ; Meikle, Susan F. / Pelvic floor disorders clinical trials : Participant recruitment and retention. In: International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2013 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 73-79.
@article{6bb4a2f5f7d6423ea934a908edcfabbd,
title = "Pelvic floor disorders clinical trials: Participant recruitment and retention",
abstract = "Introduction and hypothesis: We used a focus-group methodology to gather information about women's knowledge and attitudes regarding research participation. Methods: Two in-person focus groups at seven clinical sites were conducted in women with pelvic floor disorder (PFD): one of women with clinical trial study experience and the other without such experience. One Web-based focus group combining both groups was also conducted. Results: One hundred and five women (average age 58.6 years) participated. Participants in both groups believed that their physicians were the best source of information about clinical trials yet felt that other sources of trial information were important. Financial compensation was not a primary motivating factor for PFD trial enrollment but was, however, cited as an important consideration. Internet collection of data was feasible and provided information comparable with in-person focus groups. Conclusions: This study identified central themes guiding successful recruitment to and retention in PFD-related trials and provided insight regarding strategies that may guide future trials.",
keywords = "Focus group, Incentives, Pelvic floor disorders, Research, Web focus group",
author = "Linda Brubaker and Richter, {Holly E.} and Barber, {Matthew D.} and Yvonne Hsu and Rahn, {David D.} and Shawn Menefee and Anthony Visco and Cathie Spino and Susan Martin and Meikle, {Susan F.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00192-012-1824-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "73--79",
journal = "International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction",
issn = "0937-3462",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pelvic floor disorders clinical trials

T2 - Participant recruitment and retention

AU - Brubaker, Linda

AU - Richter, Holly E.

AU - Barber, Matthew D.

AU - Hsu, Yvonne

AU - Rahn, David D.

AU - Menefee, Shawn

AU - Visco, Anthony

AU - Spino, Cathie

AU - Martin, Susan

AU - Meikle, Susan F.

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Introduction and hypothesis: We used a focus-group methodology to gather information about women's knowledge and attitudes regarding research participation. Methods: Two in-person focus groups at seven clinical sites were conducted in women with pelvic floor disorder (PFD): one of women with clinical trial study experience and the other without such experience. One Web-based focus group combining both groups was also conducted. Results: One hundred and five women (average age 58.6 years) participated. Participants in both groups believed that their physicians were the best source of information about clinical trials yet felt that other sources of trial information were important. Financial compensation was not a primary motivating factor for PFD trial enrollment but was, however, cited as an important consideration. Internet collection of data was feasible and provided information comparable with in-person focus groups. Conclusions: This study identified central themes guiding successful recruitment to and retention in PFD-related trials and provided insight regarding strategies that may guide future trials.

AB - Introduction and hypothesis: We used a focus-group methodology to gather information about women's knowledge and attitudes regarding research participation. Methods: Two in-person focus groups at seven clinical sites were conducted in women with pelvic floor disorder (PFD): one of women with clinical trial study experience and the other without such experience. One Web-based focus group combining both groups was also conducted. Results: One hundred and five women (average age 58.6 years) participated. Participants in both groups believed that their physicians were the best source of information about clinical trials yet felt that other sources of trial information were important. Financial compensation was not a primary motivating factor for PFD trial enrollment but was, however, cited as an important consideration. Internet collection of data was feasible and provided information comparable with in-person focus groups. Conclusions: This study identified central themes guiding successful recruitment to and retention in PFD-related trials and provided insight regarding strategies that may guide future trials.

KW - Focus group

KW - Incentives

KW - Pelvic floor disorders

KW - Research

KW - Web focus group

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872327778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872327778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00192-012-1824-x

DO - 10.1007/s00192-012-1824-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22669424

AN - SCOPUS:84872327778

VL - 24

SP - 73

EP - 79

JO - International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

JF - International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

SN - 0937-3462

IS - 1

ER -