People can change: Measuring individual variability in rehabilitation science

Lauren Terhorst, Shannon B. Juengst, Kelly B. Beck, Saul Shiffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose/Objective: The purpose of this report is to provide rehabilitation researchers with an explanation of multilevel item response theory (MLIRT), specifically applied to data collected using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods. Design: This is a didactic brief report of a statistical method. The advantages of the method are illustrated using examples from the literature or clinical experience, and potential implications for rehabilitation science are highlighted. Results: Multilevel item response theory can be a used in rehabilitation research to develop items that characterize within-individual changes in disability, measure disability with instruments that have not yet been used in an EMA framework, examine temporal patterns of behaviors or symptoms that are associated with disability, or create adaptive tests based on individual performance. Conclusions: MLIRT methods are underutilized in rehabilitation research despite their unique advantages. Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure change over time should be evaluated at the within-individual level. Additionally, MLIRT offers opportunity to investigate temporal variability of behaviors or symptoms, and can potentially reduce participant burden when used in adaptive testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)468-473
Number of pages6
JournalRehabilitation Psychology
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Psychometrics
Research Personnel
Ecological Momentary Assessment
Rehabilitation Research

Keywords

  • Item response theory
  • Measurement
  • Multilevel analysis
  • Rehabilitation research
  • Statistical models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

People can change : Measuring individual variability in rehabilitation science. / Terhorst, Lauren; Juengst, Shannon B.; Beck, Kelly B.; Shiffman, Saul.

In: Rehabilitation Psychology, Vol. 63, No. 3, 01.08.2018, p. 468-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Terhorst, Lauren ; Juengst, Shannon B. ; Beck, Kelly B. ; Shiffman, Saul. / People can change : Measuring individual variability in rehabilitation science. In: Rehabilitation Psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 63, No. 3. pp. 468-473.
@article{8d49accb46a64403b2a6cefa679b867d,
title = "People can change: Measuring individual variability in rehabilitation science",
abstract = "Purpose/Objective: The purpose of this report is to provide rehabilitation researchers with an explanation of multilevel item response theory (MLIRT), specifically applied to data collected using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods. Design: This is a didactic brief report of a statistical method. The advantages of the method are illustrated using examples from the literature or clinical experience, and potential implications for rehabilitation science are highlighted. Results: Multilevel item response theory can be a used in rehabilitation research to develop items that characterize within-individual changes in disability, measure disability with instruments that have not yet been used in an EMA framework, examine temporal patterns of behaviors or symptoms that are associated with disability, or create adaptive tests based on individual performance. Conclusions: MLIRT methods are underutilized in rehabilitation research despite their unique advantages. Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure change over time should be evaluated at the within-individual level. Additionally, MLIRT offers opportunity to investigate temporal variability of behaviors or symptoms, and can potentially reduce participant burden when used in adaptive testing.",
keywords = "Item response theory, Measurement, Multilevel analysis, Rehabilitation research, Statistical models",
author = "Lauren Terhorst and Juengst, {Shannon B.} and Beck, {Kelly B.} and Saul Shiffman",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/rep0000214",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "468--473",
journal = "Rehabilitation Psychology",
issn = "0090-5550",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - People can change

T2 - Measuring individual variability in rehabilitation science

AU - Terhorst, Lauren

AU - Juengst, Shannon B.

AU - Beck, Kelly B.

AU - Shiffman, Saul

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Purpose/Objective: The purpose of this report is to provide rehabilitation researchers with an explanation of multilevel item response theory (MLIRT), specifically applied to data collected using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods. Design: This is a didactic brief report of a statistical method. The advantages of the method are illustrated using examples from the literature or clinical experience, and potential implications for rehabilitation science are highlighted. Results: Multilevel item response theory can be a used in rehabilitation research to develop items that characterize within-individual changes in disability, measure disability with instruments that have not yet been used in an EMA framework, examine temporal patterns of behaviors or symptoms that are associated with disability, or create adaptive tests based on individual performance. Conclusions: MLIRT methods are underutilized in rehabilitation research despite their unique advantages. Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure change over time should be evaluated at the within-individual level. Additionally, MLIRT offers opportunity to investigate temporal variability of behaviors or symptoms, and can potentially reduce participant burden when used in adaptive testing.

AB - Purpose/Objective: The purpose of this report is to provide rehabilitation researchers with an explanation of multilevel item response theory (MLIRT), specifically applied to data collected using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods. Design: This is a didactic brief report of a statistical method. The advantages of the method are illustrated using examples from the literature or clinical experience, and potential implications for rehabilitation science are highlighted. Results: Multilevel item response theory can be a used in rehabilitation research to develop items that characterize within-individual changes in disability, measure disability with instruments that have not yet been used in an EMA framework, examine temporal patterns of behaviors or symptoms that are associated with disability, or create adaptive tests based on individual performance. Conclusions: MLIRT methods are underutilized in rehabilitation research despite their unique advantages. Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure change over time should be evaluated at the within-individual level. Additionally, MLIRT offers opportunity to investigate temporal variability of behaviors or symptoms, and can potentially reduce participant burden when used in adaptive testing.

KW - Item response theory

KW - Measurement

KW - Multilevel analysis

KW - Rehabilitation research

KW - Statistical models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050110983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050110983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/rep0000214

DO - 10.1037/rep0000214

M3 - Article

C2 - 30024206

AN - SCOPUS:85050110983

VL - 63

SP - 468

EP - 473

JO - Rehabilitation Psychology

JF - Rehabilitation Psychology

SN - 0090-5550

IS - 3

ER -