Perceived and actual quality of life with ulcerative colitis: A comparison of medically and surgically treated patients

Akbar K. Waljee, Peter D R Higgins, Jennifer F. Waljee, Shannan R. Tujios, Aditi Saxena, Lindsay K. Brown, Meghana N. Chaudhary, Arden M. Morris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (UC) often refuse colectomy, despite data indicating that it might improve quality of life. We hypothesized that perceived utility values are different for patients living with UC compared with UC patients after total proctocolectomy. Our aims were to compare the perceived utility assigned by UC patients with and without a colectomy to standardized chronic UC and post-colectomy scenarios, and to compare the utility of actual health states among groups.METHODS: We surveyed patients in a tertiary referral center from three groups, including non-UC, UC patients without colectomy, and UC patients who were post-colectomy. We measured the Time-Trade-Off (TTO) utilities of subjects for standardized scenarios, describing moderate UC and a post-colectomy state. Among all UC patients (with and without colectomy), we measured TTO utility for their own health state.RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 150 patients per group (n=450). The non-UC patients considered UC and colectomy scenarios equally (0.92), which was similar to UC patients without colectomy (0.90 and 0.91). Post-colectomy patients strongly preferred the colectomy scenario to the UC scenario (0.86 vs. 0.92, P<0.001). The median utility of UC patients without colectomy for their actual health state was higher than that of post-colectomy patients (0.96 and 0.92, P<0.05). Patients with more social support were more likely to have undergone colectomy compared with patients with little social support (odds ratio=1.20 per dependent/supporter).CONCLUSIONS: Patients living with UC prefer their actual health state to a perceived UC scenario or a post-colectomy scenario. Patients who have undergone colectomy equate the quality of life in their actual state with that in a post-colectomy scenario, and prefer each to a perceived chronic UC state. Given the variety of preferences and the importance of social support, opportunities to interact with UC patients who have previously undergone colectomy could help patients living with UC and their physicians to navigate these complex choices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)794-799
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume106
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Colectomy
Ulcerative Colitis
Quality of Life
Social Support
Health
Colitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Perceived and actual quality of life with ulcerative colitis : A comparison of medically and surgically treated patients. / Waljee, Akbar K.; Higgins, Peter D R; Waljee, Jennifer F.; Tujios, Shannan R.; Saxena, Aditi; Brown, Lindsay K.; Chaudhary, Meghana N.; Morris, Arden M.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 106, No. 4, 04.2011, p. 794-799.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Waljee, Akbar K. ; Higgins, Peter D R ; Waljee, Jennifer F. ; Tujios, Shannan R. ; Saxena, Aditi ; Brown, Lindsay K. ; Chaudhary, Meghana N. ; Morris, Arden M. / Perceived and actual quality of life with ulcerative colitis : A comparison of medically and surgically treated patients. In: American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2011 ; Vol. 106, No. 4. pp. 794-799.
@article{25d3eb36e898446a8ef4ebe3b71c042f,
title = "Perceived and actual quality of life with ulcerative colitis: A comparison of medically and surgically treated patients",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (UC) often refuse colectomy, despite data indicating that it might improve quality of life. We hypothesized that perceived utility values are different for patients living with UC compared with UC patients after total proctocolectomy. Our aims were to compare the perceived utility assigned by UC patients with and without a colectomy to standardized chronic UC and post-colectomy scenarios, and to compare the utility of actual health states among groups.METHODS: We surveyed patients in a tertiary referral center from three groups, including non-UC, UC patients without colectomy, and UC patients who were post-colectomy. We measured the Time-Trade-Off (TTO) utilities of subjects for standardized scenarios, describing moderate UC and a post-colectomy state. Among all UC patients (with and without colectomy), we measured TTO utility for their own health state.RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 150 patients per group (n=450). The non-UC patients considered UC and colectomy scenarios equally (0.92), which was similar to UC patients without colectomy (0.90 and 0.91). Post-colectomy patients strongly preferred the colectomy scenario to the UC scenario (0.86 vs. 0.92, P<0.001). The median utility of UC patients without colectomy for their actual health state was higher than that of post-colectomy patients (0.96 and 0.92, P<0.05). Patients with more social support were more likely to have undergone colectomy compared with patients with little social support (odds ratio=1.20 per dependent/supporter).CONCLUSIONS: Patients living with UC prefer their actual health state to a perceived UC scenario or a post-colectomy scenario. Patients who have undergone colectomy equate the quality of life in their actual state with that in a post-colectomy scenario, and prefer each to a perceived chronic UC state. Given the variety of preferences and the importance of social support, opportunities to interact with UC patients who have previously undergone colectomy could help patients living with UC and their physicians to navigate these complex choices.",
author = "Waljee, {Akbar K.} and Higgins, {Peter D R} and Waljee, {Jennifer F.} and Tujios, {Shannan R.} and Aditi Saxena and Brown, {Lindsay K.} and Chaudhary, {Meghana N.} and Morris, {Arden M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1038/ajg.2011.39",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "794--799",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived and actual quality of life with ulcerative colitis

T2 - A comparison of medically and surgically treated patients

AU - Waljee, Akbar K.

AU - Higgins, Peter D R

AU - Waljee, Jennifer F.

AU - Tujios, Shannan R.

AU - Saxena, Aditi

AU - Brown, Lindsay K.

AU - Chaudhary, Meghana N.

AU - Morris, Arden M.

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (UC) often refuse colectomy, despite data indicating that it might improve quality of life. We hypothesized that perceived utility values are different for patients living with UC compared with UC patients after total proctocolectomy. Our aims were to compare the perceived utility assigned by UC patients with and without a colectomy to standardized chronic UC and post-colectomy scenarios, and to compare the utility of actual health states among groups.METHODS: We surveyed patients in a tertiary referral center from three groups, including non-UC, UC patients without colectomy, and UC patients who were post-colectomy. We measured the Time-Trade-Off (TTO) utilities of subjects for standardized scenarios, describing moderate UC and a post-colectomy state. Among all UC patients (with and without colectomy), we measured TTO utility for their own health state.RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 150 patients per group (n=450). The non-UC patients considered UC and colectomy scenarios equally (0.92), which was similar to UC patients without colectomy (0.90 and 0.91). Post-colectomy patients strongly preferred the colectomy scenario to the UC scenario (0.86 vs. 0.92, P<0.001). The median utility of UC patients without colectomy for their actual health state was higher than that of post-colectomy patients (0.96 and 0.92, P<0.05). Patients with more social support were more likely to have undergone colectomy compared with patients with little social support (odds ratio=1.20 per dependent/supporter).CONCLUSIONS: Patients living with UC prefer their actual health state to a perceived UC scenario or a post-colectomy scenario. Patients who have undergone colectomy equate the quality of life in their actual state with that in a post-colectomy scenario, and prefer each to a perceived chronic UC state. Given the variety of preferences and the importance of social support, opportunities to interact with UC patients who have previously undergone colectomy could help patients living with UC and their physicians to navigate these complex choices.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (UC) often refuse colectomy, despite data indicating that it might improve quality of life. We hypothesized that perceived utility values are different for patients living with UC compared with UC patients after total proctocolectomy. Our aims were to compare the perceived utility assigned by UC patients with and without a colectomy to standardized chronic UC and post-colectomy scenarios, and to compare the utility of actual health states among groups.METHODS: We surveyed patients in a tertiary referral center from three groups, including non-UC, UC patients without colectomy, and UC patients who were post-colectomy. We measured the Time-Trade-Off (TTO) utilities of subjects for standardized scenarios, describing moderate UC and a post-colectomy state. Among all UC patients (with and without colectomy), we measured TTO utility for their own health state.RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 150 patients per group (n=450). The non-UC patients considered UC and colectomy scenarios equally (0.92), which was similar to UC patients without colectomy (0.90 and 0.91). Post-colectomy patients strongly preferred the colectomy scenario to the UC scenario (0.86 vs. 0.92, P<0.001). The median utility of UC patients without colectomy for their actual health state was higher than that of post-colectomy patients (0.96 and 0.92, P<0.05). Patients with more social support were more likely to have undergone colectomy compared with patients with little social support (odds ratio=1.20 per dependent/supporter).CONCLUSIONS: Patients living with UC prefer their actual health state to a perceived UC scenario or a post-colectomy scenario. Patients who have undergone colectomy equate the quality of life in their actual state with that in a post-colectomy scenario, and prefer each to a perceived chronic UC state. Given the variety of preferences and the importance of social support, opportunities to interact with UC patients who have previously undergone colectomy could help patients living with UC and their physicians to navigate these complex choices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953780408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953780408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ajg.2011.39

DO - 10.1038/ajg.2011.39

M3 - Article

C2 - 21364547

AN - SCOPUS:79953780408

VL - 106

SP - 794

EP - 799

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 4

ER -