Perceived lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease (from the Dallas Heart Study)

Elisabeth Joye Petr, Colby R. Ayers, Ambarish Pandey, James A de Lemos, Tiffany M. Powell-Wiley, Amit Khera, Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, Jarett D Berry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lifetime risk estimation for cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been proposed as a useful strategy to improve risk communication in the primary prevention setting. However, the perception of lifetime risk for CVD is unknown. We included 2,998 subjects from the Dallas Heart Study. Lifetime risk for developing CVD was classified as high (≥39%) versus low (<39%) according to risk factor burden as described in our previously published algorithm. Perception of lifetime risk for myocardial infarction was assessed by way of a 5-point scale. Baseline characteristics were compared across levels of perceived lifetime risk. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association of participant characteristics with level of perceived lifetime risk for CVD and with correctness of perceptions. Of the 2,998 participants, 64.8% (n = 1,942) were classified as having high predicted lifetime risk for CVD. There was significant discordance between perceived and predicted lifetime risk. After multivariable adjustment, family history of premature myocardial infarction, high self-reported stress, and low perceived health were all strongly associated with high perceived lifetime risk (odds ratio [OR] 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72 to 3.27; OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.66 to 2.83; and OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.09 to 3.53; respectively). However, the association between traditional CVD risk factors and high perceived lifetime risk was more modest. In conclusion, misperception of lifetime risk for CVD is common and frequently reflects the influence of factors other than traditional risk factor levels. These findings highlight the importance of effectively communicating the significance of traditional risk factors in determining the lifetime risk for CVD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-58
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume114
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2014

Fingerprint

Cardiovascular Diseases
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Myocardial Infarction
Social Adjustment
Primary Prevention
Logistic Models
Communication
Regression Analysis
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Perceived lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease (from the Dallas Heart Study). / Petr, Elisabeth Joye; Ayers, Colby R.; Pandey, Ambarish; de Lemos, James A; Powell-Wiley, Tiffany M.; Khera, Amit; Lloyd-Jones, Donald M.; Berry, Jarett D.

In: American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 114, No. 1, 01.07.2014, p. 53-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Petr, Elisabeth Joye ; Ayers, Colby R. ; Pandey, Ambarish ; de Lemos, James A ; Powell-Wiley, Tiffany M. ; Khera, Amit ; Lloyd-Jones, Donald M. ; Berry, Jarett D. / Perceived lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease (from the Dallas Heart Study). In: American Journal of Cardiology. 2014 ; Vol. 114, No. 1. pp. 53-58.
@article{471fac8c3aee4a289dc35fd2d1610b69,
title = "Perceived lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease (from the Dallas Heart Study)",
abstract = "Lifetime risk estimation for cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been proposed as a useful strategy to improve risk communication in the primary prevention setting. However, the perception of lifetime risk for CVD is unknown. We included 2,998 subjects from the Dallas Heart Study. Lifetime risk for developing CVD was classified as high (≥39{\%}) versus low (<39{\%}) according to risk factor burden as described in our previously published algorithm. Perception of lifetime risk for myocardial infarction was assessed by way of a 5-point scale. Baseline characteristics were compared across levels of perceived lifetime risk. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association of participant characteristics with level of perceived lifetime risk for CVD and with correctness of perceptions. Of the 2,998 participants, 64.8{\%} (n = 1,942) were classified as having high predicted lifetime risk for CVD. There was significant discordance between perceived and predicted lifetime risk. After multivariable adjustment, family history of premature myocardial infarction, high self-reported stress, and low perceived health were all strongly associated with high perceived lifetime risk (odds ratio [OR] 2.37, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.72 to 3.27; OR 2.17, 95{\%} CI 1.66 to 2.83; and OR 2.71, 95{\%} CI 2.09 to 3.53; respectively). However, the association between traditional CVD risk factors and high perceived lifetime risk was more modest. In conclusion, misperception of lifetime risk for CVD is common and frequently reflects the influence of factors other than traditional risk factor levels. These findings highlight the importance of effectively communicating the significance of traditional risk factors in determining the lifetime risk for CVD.",
author = "Petr, {Elisabeth Joye} and Ayers, {Colby R.} and Ambarish Pandey and {de Lemos}, {James A} and Powell-Wiley, {Tiffany M.} and Amit Khera and Lloyd-Jones, {Donald M.} and Berry, {Jarett D}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "53--58",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease (from the Dallas Heart Study)

AU - Petr, Elisabeth Joye

AU - Ayers, Colby R.

AU - Pandey, Ambarish

AU - de Lemos, James A

AU - Powell-Wiley, Tiffany M.

AU - Khera, Amit

AU - Lloyd-Jones, Donald M.

AU - Berry, Jarett D

PY - 2014/7/1

Y1 - 2014/7/1

N2 - Lifetime risk estimation for cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been proposed as a useful strategy to improve risk communication in the primary prevention setting. However, the perception of lifetime risk for CVD is unknown. We included 2,998 subjects from the Dallas Heart Study. Lifetime risk for developing CVD was classified as high (≥39%) versus low (<39%) according to risk factor burden as described in our previously published algorithm. Perception of lifetime risk for myocardial infarction was assessed by way of a 5-point scale. Baseline characteristics were compared across levels of perceived lifetime risk. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association of participant characteristics with level of perceived lifetime risk for CVD and with correctness of perceptions. Of the 2,998 participants, 64.8% (n = 1,942) were classified as having high predicted lifetime risk for CVD. There was significant discordance between perceived and predicted lifetime risk. After multivariable adjustment, family history of premature myocardial infarction, high self-reported stress, and low perceived health were all strongly associated with high perceived lifetime risk (odds ratio [OR] 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72 to 3.27; OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.66 to 2.83; and OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.09 to 3.53; respectively). However, the association between traditional CVD risk factors and high perceived lifetime risk was more modest. In conclusion, misperception of lifetime risk for CVD is common and frequently reflects the influence of factors other than traditional risk factor levels. These findings highlight the importance of effectively communicating the significance of traditional risk factors in determining the lifetime risk for CVD.

AB - Lifetime risk estimation for cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been proposed as a useful strategy to improve risk communication in the primary prevention setting. However, the perception of lifetime risk for CVD is unknown. We included 2,998 subjects from the Dallas Heart Study. Lifetime risk for developing CVD was classified as high (≥39%) versus low (<39%) according to risk factor burden as described in our previously published algorithm. Perception of lifetime risk for myocardial infarction was assessed by way of a 5-point scale. Baseline characteristics were compared across levels of perceived lifetime risk. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association of participant characteristics with level of perceived lifetime risk for CVD and with correctness of perceptions. Of the 2,998 participants, 64.8% (n = 1,942) were classified as having high predicted lifetime risk for CVD. There was significant discordance between perceived and predicted lifetime risk. After multivariable adjustment, family history of premature myocardial infarction, high self-reported stress, and low perceived health were all strongly associated with high perceived lifetime risk (odds ratio [OR] 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72 to 3.27; OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.66 to 2.83; and OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.09 to 3.53; respectively). However, the association between traditional CVD risk factors and high perceived lifetime risk was more modest. In conclusion, misperception of lifetime risk for CVD is common and frequently reflects the influence of factors other than traditional risk factor levels. These findings highlight the importance of effectively communicating the significance of traditional risk factors in determining the lifetime risk for CVD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902265815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902265815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.006

DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 24834788

AN - SCOPUS:84902265815

VL - 114

SP - 53

EP - 58

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 1

ER -