Percutaneous Access for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Can Selection Criteria Be Expanded?

Stephen T. Smith, Carlos H. Timaran, R. James Valentine, Eric B. Rosero, G. Patrick Clagett, Frank R. Arko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous reports suggest that percutaneous access for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (P-EVAR) is as safe as open access (O-EVAR) in patients with favorable femoral anatomy. Severe femoral artery calcification and obesity have been considered relative contraindications to P-EVAR, but these criteria have not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to assess the postoperative anatomic changes associated with P-EVAR versus O-EVAR using three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomographic (CT) reconstruction and to evaluate the overall results of the two procedures in a group of patients with suboptimal femoral anatomy. During a recent 26-month period, 173 patients underwent EVAR at our institutions, including 35 P-EVARs. Of these, 22 (63%) had complete pre- and postoperative CT imaging of the femoral arteries. These subjects were compared to 22 matched controls who underwent O-EVAR during the same period. Automated 3-D reconstructions were used to measure the following anatomic femoral artery parameters before and after EVAR: arterial depth, calcification score, minimum diameter and area, and maximum diameter and area. Of the 88 study arteries, 50 underwent open access and 38 percutaneous access (Proglide, n = 11; Prostar XL, n = 27). Both groups were similar regarding sheath size, number of components, operative time, blood loss, and length of stay. Significantly more O-EVAR subjects suffered groin complications (p = 0.02), including five hematomas, two wound infections, two femoral thromboses, and one vessel which required patch repair. In the P-EVAR group there was only one hematoma, which was managed conservatively. There was no difference between the P-EVAR and O-EVAR groups with respect to femoral artery calcification (Agatston scores 667 ± 719 vs. 945 ± 1,248, p = 0.37). Obesity (body mass index >30) was documented in six (27%) of both the P-EVAR and O-EVAR groups (p = nonsignificant). Pre- and postoperative CT-derived anatomic data showed a significant decrease in the minimal vessel area with O-EVAR compared to P-EVAR (p = 0.02). This study demonstrates that patients with obesity or severely calcified femoral arteries can be successfully treated percutaneously with fewer minor groin complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)621-626
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Vascular Surgery
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Femoral Artery
Patient Selection
Thigh
Groin
Obesity
Hematoma
Anatomy
Wound Infection
Operative Time
Length of Stay
Body Mass Index
Thrombosis
Arteries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Percutaneous Access for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair : Can Selection Criteria Be Expanded? / Smith, Stephen T.; Timaran, Carlos H.; Valentine, R. James; Rosero, Eric B.; Clagett, G. Patrick; Arko, Frank R.

In: Annals of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 23, No. 5, 09.2009, p. 621-626.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Stephen T. ; Timaran, Carlos H. ; Valentine, R. James ; Rosero, Eric B. ; Clagett, G. Patrick ; Arko, Frank R. / Percutaneous Access for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair : Can Selection Criteria Be Expanded?. In: Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 621-626.
@article{1da038bb93c34032a673d5bcd1a16a4f,
title = "Percutaneous Access for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Can Selection Criteria Be Expanded?",
abstract = "Previous reports suggest that percutaneous access for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (P-EVAR) is as safe as open access (O-EVAR) in patients with favorable femoral anatomy. Severe femoral artery calcification and obesity have been considered relative contraindications to P-EVAR, but these criteria have not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to assess the postoperative anatomic changes associated with P-EVAR versus O-EVAR using three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomographic (CT) reconstruction and to evaluate the overall results of the two procedures in a group of patients with suboptimal femoral anatomy. During a recent 26-month period, 173 patients underwent EVAR at our institutions, including 35 P-EVARs. Of these, 22 (63{\%}) had complete pre- and postoperative CT imaging of the femoral arteries. These subjects were compared to 22 matched controls who underwent O-EVAR during the same period. Automated 3-D reconstructions were used to measure the following anatomic femoral artery parameters before and after EVAR: arterial depth, calcification score, minimum diameter and area, and maximum diameter and area. Of the 88 study arteries, 50 underwent open access and 38 percutaneous access (Proglide, n = 11; Prostar XL, n = 27). Both groups were similar regarding sheath size, number of components, operative time, blood loss, and length of stay. Significantly more O-EVAR subjects suffered groin complications (p = 0.02), including five hematomas, two wound infections, two femoral thromboses, and one vessel which required patch repair. In the P-EVAR group there was only one hematoma, which was managed conservatively. There was no difference between the P-EVAR and O-EVAR groups with respect to femoral artery calcification (Agatston scores 667 ± 719 vs. 945 ± 1,248, p = 0.37). Obesity (body mass index >30) was documented in six (27{\%}) of both the P-EVAR and O-EVAR groups (p = nonsignificant). Pre- and postoperative CT-derived anatomic data showed a significant decrease in the minimal vessel area with O-EVAR compared to P-EVAR (p = 0.02). This study demonstrates that patients with obesity or severely calcified femoral arteries can be successfully treated percutaneously with fewer minor groin complications.",
author = "Smith, {Stephen T.} and Timaran, {Carlos H.} and Valentine, {R. James} and Rosero, {Eric B.} and Clagett, {G. Patrick} and Arko, {Frank R.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.avsg.2008.09.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "621--626",
journal = "Annals of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0890-5096",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous Access for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

T2 - Can Selection Criteria Be Expanded?

AU - Smith, Stephen T.

AU - Timaran, Carlos H.

AU - Valentine, R. James

AU - Rosero, Eric B.

AU - Clagett, G. Patrick

AU - Arko, Frank R.

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Previous reports suggest that percutaneous access for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (P-EVAR) is as safe as open access (O-EVAR) in patients with favorable femoral anatomy. Severe femoral artery calcification and obesity have been considered relative contraindications to P-EVAR, but these criteria have not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to assess the postoperative anatomic changes associated with P-EVAR versus O-EVAR using three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomographic (CT) reconstruction and to evaluate the overall results of the two procedures in a group of patients with suboptimal femoral anatomy. During a recent 26-month period, 173 patients underwent EVAR at our institutions, including 35 P-EVARs. Of these, 22 (63%) had complete pre- and postoperative CT imaging of the femoral arteries. These subjects were compared to 22 matched controls who underwent O-EVAR during the same period. Automated 3-D reconstructions were used to measure the following anatomic femoral artery parameters before and after EVAR: arterial depth, calcification score, minimum diameter and area, and maximum diameter and area. Of the 88 study arteries, 50 underwent open access and 38 percutaneous access (Proglide, n = 11; Prostar XL, n = 27). Both groups were similar regarding sheath size, number of components, operative time, blood loss, and length of stay. Significantly more O-EVAR subjects suffered groin complications (p = 0.02), including five hematomas, two wound infections, two femoral thromboses, and one vessel which required patch repair. In the P-EVAR group there was only one hematoma, which was managed conservatively. There was no difference between the P-EVAR and O-EVAR groups with respect to femoral artery calcification (Agatston scores 667 ± 719 vs. 945 ± 1,248, p = 0.37). Obesity (body mass index >30) was documented in six (27%) of both the P-EVAR and O-EVAR groups (p = nonsignificant). Pre- and postoperative CT-derived anatomic data showed a significant decrease in the minimal vessel area with O-EVAR compared to P-EVAR (p = 0.02). This study demonstrates that patients with obesity or severely calcified femoral arteries can be successfully treated percutaneously with fewer minor groin complications.

AB - Previous reports suggest that percutaneous access for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (P-EVAR) is as safe as open access (O-EVAR) in patients with favorable femoral anatomy. Severe femoral artery calcification and obesity have been considered relative contraindications to P-EVAR, but these criteria have not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to assess the postoperative anatomic changes associated with P-EVAR versus O-EVAR using three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomographic (CT) reconstruction and to evaluate the overall results of the two procedures in a group of patients with suboptimal femoral anatomy. During a recent 26-month period, 173 patients underwent EVAR at our institutions, including 35 P-EVARs. Of these, 22 (63%) had complete pre- and postoperative CT imaging of the femoral arteries. These subjects were compared to 22 matched controls who underwent O-EVAR during the same period. Automated 3-D reconstructions were used to measure the following anatomic femoral artery parameters before and after EVAR: arterial depth, calcification score, minimum diameter and area, and maximum diameter and area. Of the 88 study arteries, 50 underwent open access and 38 percutaneous access (Proglide, n = 11; Prostar XL, n = 27). Both groups were similar regarding sheath size, number of components, operative time, blood loss, and length of stay. Significantly more O-EVAR subjects suffered groin complications (p = 0.02), including five hematomas, two wound infections, two femoral thromboses, and one vessel which required patch repair. In the P-EVAR group there was only one hematoma, which was managed conservatively. There was no difference between the P-EVAR and O-EVAR groups with respect to femoral artery calcification (Agatston scores 667 ± 719 vs. 945 ± 1,248, p = 0.37). Obesity (body mass index >30) was documented in six (27%) of both the P-EVAR and O-EVAR groups (p = nonsignificant). Pre- and postoperative CT-derived anatomic data showed a significant decrease in the minimal vessel area with O-EVAR compared to P-EVAR (p = 0.02). This study demonstrates that patients with obesity or severely calcified femoral arteries can be successfully treated percutaneously with fewer minor groin complications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69749117065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69749117065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.09.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 18954964

AN - SCOPUS:69749117065

VL - 23

SP - 621

EP - 626

JO - Annals of Vascular Surgery

JF - Annals of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0890-5096

IS - 5

ER -