Perineal surface electromyography does not typically demonstrate expected relaxation during normal voiding

Anna C. Kirby, Charles W. Nager, Heather J. Litman, Mary P. Fitzgerald, Stephen Kraus, Peggy Norton, Larry Sirls, Leslie Rickey, Tracey Wilson, Kimberly J. Dandreo, Jonathan Shepherd, Philippe Zimmern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims To describe perineal surface patch electromyography (EMG) activity during urodynamics (UDS) and compare activity between filling and voiding phases and to assess for a relationship between preoperative EMG activity and postoperative voiding symptoms. Methods 655 women underwent standardized preoperative UDS that included perineal surface EMG prior to undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Pressure-flow studies were evaluated for abdominal straining and interrupted flow. Quantitative EMG values were extracted from 10 predetermined time-points and compared between fill and void. Qualitative EMG activity was assessed for the percent of time EMG was active during fill and void and for the average amplitude of EMG during fill compared to void. Postoperative voiding dysfunction was defined as surgical revision or catheterization more than 6 weeks after surgery. Fisher's exact test with a 5% two-sided significance level was used to assess differences in EMG activity and postoperative voiding dysfunction. Results 321 UDS had interpretable EMG studies, of which 131 (41%) had EMG values at all 10 predetermined and annotated time-points. Quantitative and qualitative EMG signals during flow were usually greater than during fill. The prevalence of postoperative voiding dysfunction in subjects with higher preoperative EMG activity during void was not significantly different. Results were similar in the 42 subjects who had neither abdominal straining during void nor interrupted flow. Conclusions Perineal surface patch EMG did not measure expected pelvic floor and urethral sphincter relaxation during voiding. Preoperative EMG did not predict patients at risk for postoperative voiding dysfunction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1591-1596
Number of pages6
JournalNeurourology and Urodynamics
Volume30
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Electromyography
Urodynamics
Pelvic Floor
Stress Urinary Incontinence
Urethra
Reoperation
Catheterization

Keywords

  • electromyography
  • pelvic floor
  • stress urinary incontinence
  • urethra
  • urodynamics
  • voiding dysfunction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Urology

Cite this

Perineal surface electromyography does not typically demonstrate expected relaxation during normal voiding. / Kirby, Anna C.; Nager, Charles W.; Litman, Heather J.; Fitzgerald, Mary P.; Kraus, Stephen; Norton, Peggy; Sirls, Larry; Rickey, Leslie; Wilson, Tracey; Dandreo, Kimberly J.; Shepherd, Jonathan; Zimmern, Philippe.

In: Neurourology and Urodynamics, Vol. 30, No. 8, 11.2011, p. 1591-1596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kirby, AC, Nager, CW, Litman, HJ, Fitzgerald, MP, Kraus, S, Norton, P, Sirls, L, Rickey, L, Wilson, T, Dandreo, KJ, Shepherd, J & Zimmern, P 2011, 'Perineal surface electromyography does not typically demonstrate expected relaxation during normal voiding', Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1591-1596. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.21080
Kirby, Anna C. ; Nager, Charles W. ; Litman, Heather J. ; Fitzgerald, Mary P. ; Kraus, Stephen ; Norton, Peggy ; Sirls, Larry ; Rickey, Leslie ; Wilson, Tracey ; Dandreo, Kimberly J. ; Shepherd, Jonathan ; Zimmern, Philippe. / Perineal surface electromyography does not typically demonstrate expected relaxation during normal voiding. In: Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2011 ; Vol. 30, No. 8. pp. 1591-1596.
@article{92b0e670b40c48cf9de0eb41db70787c,
title = "Perineal surface electromyography does not typically demonstrate expected relaxation during normal voiding",
abstract = "Aims To describe perineal surface patch electromyography (EMG) activity during urodynamics (UDS) and compare activity between filling and voiding phases and to assess for a relationship between preoperative EMG activity and postoperative voiding symptoms. Methods 655 women underwent standardized preoperative UDS that included perineal surface EMG prior to undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Pressure-flow studies were evaluated for abdominal straining and interrupted flow. Quantitative EMG values were extracted from 10 predetermined time-points and compared between fill and void. Qualitative EMG activity was assessed for the percent of time EMG was active during fill and void and for the average amplitude of EMG during fill compared to void. Postoperative voiding dysfunction was defined as surgical revision or catheterization more than 6 weeks after surgery. Fisher's exact test with a 5{\%} two-sided significance level was used to assess differences in EMG activity and postoperative voiding dysfunction. Results 321 UDS had interpretable EMG studies, of which 131 (41{\%}) had EMG values at all 10 predetermined and annotated time-points. Quantitative and qualitative EMG signals during flow were usually greater than during fill. The prevalence of postoperative voiding dysfunction in subjects with higher preoperative EMG activity during void was not significantly different. Results were similar in the 42 subjects who had neither abdominal straining during void nor interrupted flow. Conclusions Perineal surface patch EMG did not measure expected pelvic floor and urethral sphincter relaxation during voiding. Preoperative EMG did not predict patients at risk for postoperative voiding dysfunction.",
keywords = "electromyography, pelvic floor, stress urinary incontinence, urethra, urodynamics, voiding dysfunction",
author = "Kirby, {Anna C.} and Nager, {Charles W.} and Litman, {Heather J.} and Fitzgerald, {Mary P.} and Stephen Kraus and Peggy Norton and Larry Sirls and Leslie Rickey and Tracey Wilson and Dandreo, {Kimberly J.} and Jonathan Shepherd and Philippe Zimmern",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1002/nau.21080",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "1591--1596",
journal = "Neurourology and Urodynamics",
issn = "0733-2467",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perineal surface electromyography does not typically demonstrate expected relaxation during normal voiding

AU - Kirby, Anna C.

AU - Nager, Charles W.

AU - Litman, Heather J.

AU - Fitzgerald, Mary P.

AU - Kraus, Stephen

AU - Norton, Peggy

AU - Sirls, Larry

AU - Rickey, Leslie

AU - Wilson, Tracey

AU - Dandreo, Kimberly J.

AU - Shepherd, Jonathan

AU - Zimmern, Philippe

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Aims To describe perineal surface patch electromyography (EMG) activity during urodynamics (UDS) and compare activity between filling and voiding phases and to assess for a relationship between preoperative EMG activity and postoperative voiding symptoms. Methods 655 women underwent standardized preoperative UDS that included perineal surface EMG prior to undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Pressure-flow studies were evaluated for abdominal straining and interrupted flow. Quantitative EMG values were extracted from 10 predetermined time-points and compared between fill and void. Qualitative EMG activity was assessed for the percent of time EMG was active during fill and void and for the average amplitude of EMG during fill compared to void. Postoperative voiding dysfunction was defined as surgical revision or catheterization more than 6 weeks after surgery. Fisher's exact test with a 5% two-sided significance level was used to assess differences in EMG activity and postoperative voiding dysfunction. Results 321 UDS had interpretable EMG studies, of which 131 (41%) had EMG values at all 10 predetermined and annotated time-points. Quantitative and qualitative EMG signals during flow were usually greater than during fill. The prevalence of postoperative voiding dysfunction in subjects with higher preoperative EMG activity during void was not significantly different. Results were similar in the 42 subjects who had neither abdominal straining during void nor interrupted flow. Conclusions Perineal surface patch EMG did not measure expected pelvic floor and urethral sphincter relaxation during voiding. Preoperative EMG did not predict patients at risk for postoperative voiding dysfunction.

AB - Aims To describe perineal surface patch electromyography (EMG) activity during urodynamics (UDS) and compare activity between filling and voiding phases and to assess for a relationship between preoperative EMG activity and postoperative voiding symptoms. Methods 655 women underwent standardized preoperative UDS that included perineal surface EMG prior to undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Pressure-flow studies were evaluated for abdominal straining and interrupted flow. Quantitative EMG values were extracted from 10 predetermined time-points and compared between fill and void. Qualitative EMG activity was assessed for the percent of time EMG was active during fill and void and for the average amplitude of EMG during fill compared to void. Postoperative voiding dysfunction was defined as surgical revision or catheterization more than 6 weeks after surgery. Fisher's exact test with a 5% two-sided significance level was used to assess differences in EMG activity and postoperative voiding dysfunction. Results 321 UDS had interpretable EMG studies, of which 131 (41%) had EMG values at all 10 predetermined and annotated time-points. Quantitative and qualitative EMG signals during flow were usually greater than during fill. The prevalence of postoperative voiding dysfunction in subjects with higher preoperative EMG activity during void was not significantly different. Results were similar in the 42 subjects who had neither abdominal straining during void nor interrupted flow. Conclusions Perineal surface patch EMG did not measure expected pelvic floor and urethral sphincter relaxation during voiding. Preoperative EMG did not predict patients at risk for postoperative voiding dysfunction.

KW - electromyography

KW - pelvic floor

KW - stress urinary incontinence

KW - urethra

KW - urodynamics

KW - voiding dysfunction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054828259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054828259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/nau.21080

DO - 10.1002/nau.21080

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 1591

EP - 1596

JO - Neurourology and Urodynamics

JF - Neurourology and Urodynamics

SN - 0733-2467

IS - 8

ER -