Photosensitivity in cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Andrew Kim, Benjamin F. Chong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is a well-known exacerbating factor for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with photosensitivity comprising one of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, discerning true photosensitivity in this population is difficult due to the broad language utilized by the ACR and the delayed-onset nature of photosensitive lupus lesions. Aims: The objective of this report is to provide a review of photosensitivity, photoprovocation, and phototherapy in the context of CLE patients. Methods: A literature review in PubMed was conducted using the terms 'ultraviolet light,' 'lupus erythematosus,' 'photoprovocation,' or 'photosensitivity.' Results: Self-patient reporting of photosensitivity and the broad definition of photosensitivity have led to the wide range of photosensitivity rates in CLE patients. Photoprovocation testing provides a more objective method to measure photosensitivity, but even these trials demonstrate significant differences due to protocol variations. Despite UVR's deleterious effect on lupus patients, ultraviolet A (UVA)-1 may have therapeutic benefits as shown by observations on murine models and human lupus subjects. Conclusions: Accurately discerning photosensitivity has diagnostic implications for SLE and provides motivation for greater patient adherence to photoprotective methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4-11
Number of pages8
JournalPhotodermatology Photoimmunology and Photomedicine
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Background Radiation
Phototherapy
Rheumatology
Ultraviolet Rays
Patient Compliance
PubMed
Motivation
Language
Population

Keywords

  • Cutaneous lupus erythematosus
  • Photosensitivity
  • Phototesting
  • Ultraviolet radiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Photosensitivity in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. / Kim, Andrew; Chong, Benjamin F.

In: Photodermatology Photoimmunology and Photomedicine, Vol. 29, No. 1, 02.2013, p. 4-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{49c5352be3f24599afca435231fc4f8a,
title = "Photosensitivity in cutaneous lupus erythematosus",
abstract = "Background: Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is a well-known exacerbating factor for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with photosensitivity comprising one of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, discerning true photosensitivity in this population is difficult due to the broad language utilized by the ACR and the delayed-onset nature of photosensitive lupus lesions. Aims: The objective of this report is to provide a review of photosensitivity, photoprovocation, and phototherapy in the context of CLE patients. Methods: A literature review in PubMed was conducted using the terms 'ultraviolet light,' 'lupus erythematosus,' 'photoprovocation,' or 'photosensitivity.' Results: Self-patient reporting of photosensitivity and the broad definition of photosensitivity have led to the wide range of photosensitivity rates in CLE patients. Photoprovocation testing provides a more objective method to measure photosensitivity, but even these trials demonstrate significant differences due to protocol variations. Despite UVR's deleterious effect on lupus patients, ultraviolet A (UVA)-1 may have therapeutic benefits as shown by observations on murine models and human lupus subjects. Conclusions: Accurately discerning photosensitivity has diagnostic implications for SLE and provides motivation for greater patient adherence to photoprotective methods.",
keywords = "Cutaneous lupus erythematosus, Photosensitivity, Phototesting, Ultraviolet radiation",
author = "Andrew Kim and Chong, {Benjamin F.}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/phpp.12018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "4--11",
journal = "Photo-dermatology",
issn = "0905-4383",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Photosensitivity in cutaneous lupus erythematosus

AU - Kim, Andrew

AU - Chong, Benjamin F.

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Background: Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is a well-known exacerbating factor for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with photosensitivity comprising one of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, discerning true photosensitivity in this population is difficult due to the broad language utilized by the ACR and the delayed-onset nature of photosensitive lupus lesions. Aims: The objective of this report is to provide a review of photosensitivity, photoprovocation, and phototherapy in the context of CLE patients. Methods: A literature review in PubMed was conducted using the terms 'ultraviolet light,' 'lupus erythematosus,' 'photoprovocation,' or 'photosensitivity.' Results: Self-patient reporting of photosensitivity and the broad definition of photosensitivity have led to the wide range of photosensitivity rates in CLE patients. Photoprovocation testing provides a more objective method to measure photosensitivity, but even these trials demonstrate significant differences due to protocol variations. Despite UVR's deleterious effect on lupus patients, ultraviolet A (UVA)-1 may have therapeutic benefits as shown by observations on murine models and human lupus subjects. Conclusions: Accurately discerning photosensitivity has diagnostic implications for SLE and provides motivation for greater patient adherence to photoprotective methods.

AB - Background: Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is a well-known exacerbating factor for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), with photosensitivity comprising one of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, discerning true photosensitivity in this population is difficult due to the broad language utilized by the ACR and the delayed-onset nature of photosensitive lupus lesions. Aims: The objective of this report is to provide a review of photosensitivity, photoprovocation, and phototherapy in the context of CLE patients. Methods: A literature review in PubMed was conducted using the terms 'ultraviolet light,' 'lupus erythematosus,' 'photoprovocation,' or 'photosensitivity.' Results: Self-patient reporting of photosensitivity and the broad definition of photosensitivity have led to the wide range of photosensitivity rates in CLE patients. Photoprovocation testing provides a more objective method to measure photosensitivity, but even these trials demonstrate significant differences due to protocol variations. Despite UVR's deleterious effect on lupus patients, ultraviolet A (UVA)-1 may have therapeutic benefits as shown by observations on murine models and human lupus subjects. Conclusions: Accurately discerning photosensitivity has diagnostic implications for SLE and provides motivation for greater patient adherence to photoprotective methods.

KW - Cutaneous lupus erythematosus

KW - Photosensitivity

KW - Phototesting

KW - Ultraviolet radiation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871861256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871861256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/phpp.12018

DO - 10.1111/phpp.12018

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 4

EP - 11

JO - Photo-dermatology

JF - Photo-dermatology

SN - 0905-4383

IS - 1

ER -