Piloting a Sex-Specific, Technology-Enhanced, Active Learning Intervention for Stroke Prevention in Women

Amanda Dirickson, Sonja E. Stutzman, Mark J. Alberts, Roberta L. Novakovic, Ann M. Stowe, Claudia C. Beal, Mark P. Goldberg, Dai Wai M. Olson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Recent studies reveal deficiencies in stroke awareness and knowledge of risk factors among women. Existing stroke education interventions may not address common and sex-specific risk factors in the population with the highest stroke-related rate of mortality. Objective: This pilot study assessed the efficacy of a technology-enhanced, sex-specific educational program ("SISTERS") for women's knowledge of stroke. Methods: This was an experimental pretest-posttest design. The sample consisted of 150 women (mean age, 55 years) with at least 1 stroke risk factor. Participants were randomized to either the intervention (n = 75) or control (n = 75) group. Data were collected at baseline and at a 2-week posttest. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in mean knowledge score (P =.67), mean confidence score (P =.77), or mean accuracy score (P =.75) between the intervention and control groups at posttest. Regression analysis revealed that older age was associated with lower knowledge scores (P <.001) and lower confidence scores (P <.001). After controlling for age, the SISTERS program was associated with a statistically significant difference in knowledge (P <.001) and confidence (P <.001). Conclusions: Although no change occurred overall, after controlling for age, there was a statistically significant benefit. Older women may have less comfort with technology and require consideration for cognitive differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)349-354
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Neuroscience Nursing
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Problem-Based Learning
Stroke
Technology
Regression Analysis
Education
Control Groups
Mortality
Population

Keywords

  • education
  • sex-specific
  • stroke
  • technology
  • women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Medical–Surgical

Cite this

Piloting a Sex-Specific, Technology-Enhanced, Active Learning Intervention for Stroke Prevention in Women. / Dirickson, Amanda; Stutzman, Sonja E.; Alberts, Mark J.; Novakovic, Roberta L.; Stowe, Ann M.; Beal, Claudia C.; Goldberg, Mark P.; Olson, Dai Wai M.

In: Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, Vol. 49, No. 6, 01.12.2017, p. 349-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{16bedad4136a49e599be4698d014d494,
title = "Piloting a Sex-Specific, Technology-Enhanced, Active Learning Intervention for Stroke Prevention in Women",
abstract = "Background: Recent studies reveal deficiencies in stroke awareness and knowledge of risk factors among women. Existing stroke education interventions may not address common and sex-specific risk factors in the population with the highest stroke-related rate of mortality. Objective: This pilot study assessed the efficacy of a technology-enhanced, sex-specific educational program ({"}SISTERS{"}) for women's knowledge of stroke. Methods: This was an experimental pretest-posttest design. The sample consisted of 150 women (mean age, 55 years) with at least 1 stroke risk factor. Participants were randomized to either the intervention (n = 75) or control (n = 75) group. Data were collected at baseline and at a 2-week posttest. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in mean knowledge score (P =.67), mean confidence score (P =.77), or mean accuracy score (P =.75) between the intervention and control groups at posttest. Regression analysis revealed that older age was associated with lower knowledge scores (P <.001) and lower confidence scores (P <.001). After controlling for age, the SISTERS program was associated with a statistically significant difference in knowledge (P <.001) and confidence (P <.001). Conclusions: Although no change occurred overall, after controlling for age, there was a statistically significant benefit. Older women may have less comfort with technology and require consideration for cognitive differences.",
keywords = "education, sex-specific, stroke, technology, women",
author = "Amanda Dirickson and Stutzman, {Sonja E.} and Alberts, {Mark J.} and Novakovic, {Roberta L.} and Stowe, {Ann M.} and Beal, {Claudia C.} and Goldberg, {Mark P.} and Olson, {Dai Wai M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/JNN.0000000000000323",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "349--354",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience Nursing",
issn = "0888-0395",
publisher = "American Association of Neuroscience Nurses",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Piloting a Sex-Specific, Technology-Enhanced, Active Learning Intervention for Stroke Prevention in Women

AU - Dirickson, Amanda

AU - Stutzman, Sonja E.

AU - Alberts, Mark J.

AU - Novakovic, Roberta L.

AU - Stowe, Ann M.

AU - Beal, Claudia C.

AU - Goldberg, Mark P.

AU - Olson, Dai Wai M.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Background: Recent studies reveal deficiencies in stroke awareness and knowledge of risk factors among women. Existing stroke education interventions may not address common and sex-specific risk factors in the population with the highest stroke-related rate of mortality. Objective: This pilot study assessed the efficacy of a technology-enhanced, sex-specific educational program ("SISTERS") for women's knowledge of stroke. Methods: This was an experimental pretest-posttest design. The sample consisted of 150 women (mean age, 55 years) with at least 1 stroke risk factor. Participants were randomized to either the intervention (n = 75) or control (n = 75) group. Data were collected at baseline and at a 2-week posttest. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in mean knowledge score (P =.67), mean confidence score (P =.77), or mean accuracy score (P =.75) between the intervention and control groups at posttest. Regression analysis revealed that older age was associated with lower knowledge scores (P <.001) and lower confidence scores (P <.001). After controlling for age, the SISTERS program was associated with a statistically significant difference in knowledge (P <.001) and confidence (P <.001). Conclusions: Although no change occurred overall, after controlling for age, there was a statistically significant benefit. Older women may have less comfort with technology and require consideration for cognitive differences.

AB - Background: Recent studies reveal deficiencies in stroke awareness and knowledge of risk factors among women. Existing stroke education interventions may not address common and sex-specific risk factors in the population with the highest stroke-related rate of mortality. Objective: This pilot study assessed the efficacy of a technology-enhanced, sex-specific educational program ("SISTERS") for women's knowledge of stroke. Methods: This was an experimental pretest-posttest design. The sample consisted of 150 women (mean age, 55 years) with at least 1 stroke risk factor. Participants were randomized to either the intervention (n = 75) or control (n = 75) group. Data were collected at baseline and at a 2-week posttest. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in mean knowledge score (P =.67), mean confidence score (P =.77), or mean accuracy score (P =.75) between the intervention and control groups at posttest. Regression analysis revealed that older age was associated with lower knowledge scores (P <.001) and lower confidence scores (P <.001). After controlling for age, the SISTERS program was associated with a statistically significant difference in knowledge (P <.001) and confidence (P <.001). Conclusions: Although no change occurred overall, after controlling for age, there was a statistically significant benefit. Older women may have less comfort with technology and require consideration for cognitive differences.

KW - education

KW - sex-specific

KW - stroke

KW - technology

KW - women

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034445179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034445179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000323

DO - 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000323

M3 - Article

C2 - 29117030

AN - SCOPUS:85034445179

VL - 49

SP - 349

EP - 354

JO - Journal of Neuroscience Nursing

JF - Journal of Neuroscience Nursing

SN - 0888-0395

IS - 6

ER -