Pitavastatin 4 mg Provides Significantly Greater Reduction in Remnant Lipoprotein Cholesterol Compared with Pravastatin 40 mg: Results from the Short-term Phase IV PREVAIL US Trial in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia

P. Elliott Miller, Seth S. Martin, Parag H. Joshi, Steven R. Jones, Joseph M. Massaro, Ralph B. D'Agostino, Craig A. Sponseller, Peter P. Toth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Remnants are partially hydrolyzed, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins that are implicated in atherosclerosis. We assessed the adequacy of pitavastatin 4 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in reducing atherogenic lipid parameters beyond LDL-C, in particular remnant lipoprotein cholesterol (RLP-C). Methods From the Phase IV, multicenter, randomized, double-blind PREVAIL US (A Study of Pitavastatin 4 mg Vs. Pravastatin 40 mg in Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia) trial, we examined lipoprotein cholesterol subfractions using Vertical Auto Profile testing and apolipoproteins B and A-I at baseline and 12 weeks. Participants with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia had LDL-C levels of 130 to 220 mg/dL and triglyceride levels ≤400 mg/dL. In this post hoc analysis, changes in lipid parameters were compared by using ANCOVA. Findings Lipoprotein subfraction data were available in 312 patients (pitavastatin, n = 157; pravastatin, n = 155). Pitavastatin promoted a greater reduction in RLP-C than pravastatin (-13.6 [8.7] vs -9.3 [9.5] mg/dL). Furthermore, the pitavastatin group reported greater reductions in both components of RLP-C (both, P < 0.001): intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-9.5 [6.3] vs -6.4 [6.6] mg/dL) and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol subfraction 3 (-4.1 [3.5] vs -2.9 [3.8] mg/dL). There were also greater reductions in the major ratios of risk (apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A-I and total cholesterol/HDL-C) (both, P < 0.001). There were no significant changes in HDL-C, its subfractions, or natural log lipoprotein(a)-cholesterol. The mean age was 58.8 ± 8.9 years in the pitavastatin group and 57.0 ± 10.2 years in the pravastatin group. Implications Compared with pravastatin 40 mg daily, pitavastatin 4 mg provided superior reductions in atherogenic lipid parameters beyond LDL-C, including RLP-C. Future studies are needed investigate the clinical implications of lowering directly measured RLP-C as the principal target. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01256476.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)603-609
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Therapeutics
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Pravastatin
Dyslipidemias
Hyperlipidemias
Apolipoprotein A-I
Apolipoproteins B
Lipids
Lipoproteins
Triglycerides
VLDL Cholesterol
Lipoprotein(a)
lipoprotein cholesterol
pitavastatin
HDL Cholesterol
Atherosclerosis
Odds Ratio
Cholesterol

Keywords

  • Key words hyperlipidemia
  • mixed dyslipidemia
  • pitavastatin
  • pravastatin
  • remnant lipoprotein cholesterol

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Pitavastatin 4 mg Provides Significantly Greater Reduction in Remnant Lipoprotein Cholesterol Compared with Pravastatin 40 mg : Results from the Short-term Phase IV PREVAIL US Trial in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia. / Miller, P. Elliott; Martin, Seth S.; Joshi, Parag H.; Jones, Steven R.; Massaro, Joseph M.; D'Agostino, Ralph B.; Sponseller, Craig A.; Toth, Peter P.

In: Clinical Therapeutics, Vol. 38, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 603-609.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4c031d3491f04f73b2f8710a9615d0f9,
title = "Pitavastatin 4 mg Provides Significantly Greater Reduction in Remnant Lipoprotein Cholesterol Compared with Pravastatin 40 mg: Results from the Short-term Phase IV PREVAIL US Trial in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia",
abstract = "Purpose Remnants are partially hydrolyzed, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins that are implicated in atherosclerosis. We assessed the adequacy of pitavastatin 4 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in reducing atherogenic lipid parameters beyond LDL-C, in particular remnant lipoprotein cholesterol (RLP-C). Methods From the Phase IV, multicenter, randomized, double-blind PREVAIL US (A Study of Pitavastatin 4 mg Vs. Pravastatin 40 mg in Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia) trial, we examined lipoprotein cholesterol subfractions using Vertical Auto Profile testing and apolipoproteins B and A-I at baseline and 12 weeks. Participants with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia had LDL-C levels of 130 to 220 mg/dL and triglyceride levels ≤400 mg/dL. In this post hoc analysis, changes in lipid parameters were compared by using ANCOVA. Findings Lipoprotein subfraction data were available in 312 patients (pitavastatin, n = 157; pravastatin, n = 155). Pitavastatin promoted a greater reduction in RLP-C than pravastatin (-13.6 [8.7] vs -9.3 [9.5] mg/dL). Furthermore, the pitavastatin group reported greater reductions in both components of RLP-C (both, P < 0.001): intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-9.5 [6.3] vs -6.4 [6.6] mg/dL) and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol subfraction 3 (-4.1 [3.5] vs -2.9 [3.8] mg/dL). There were also greater reductions in the major ratios of risk (apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A-I and total cholesterol/HDL-C) (both, P < 0.001). There were no significant changes in HDL-C, its subfractions, or natural log lipoprotein(a)-cholesterol. The mean age was 58.8 ± 8.9 years in the pitavastatin group and 57.0 ± 10.2 years in the pravastatin group. Implications Compared with pravastatin 40 mg daily, pitavastatin 4 mg provided superior reductions in atherogenic lipid parameters beyond LDL-C, including RLP-C. Future studies are needed investigate the clinical implications of lowering directly measured RLP-C as the principal target. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01256476.",
keywords = "Key words hyperlipidemia, mixed dyslipidemia, pitavastatin, pravastatin, remnant lipoprotein cholesterol",
author = "Miller, {P. Elliott} and Martin, {Seth S.} and Joshi, {Parag H.} and Jones, {Steven R.} and Massaro, {Joseph M.} and D'Agostino, {Ralph B.} and Sponseller, {Craig A.} and Toth, {Peter P.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.02.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "603--609",
journal = "Clinical Therapeutics",
issn = "0149-2918",
publisher = "Excerpta Medica",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pitavastatin 4 mg Provides Significantly Greater Reduction in Remnant Lipoprotein Cholesterol Compared with Pravastatin 40 mg

T2 - Results from the Short-term Phase IV PREVAIL US Trial in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia

AU - Miller, P. Elliott

AU - Martin, Seth S.

AU - Joshi, Parag H.

AU - Jones, Steven R.

AU - Massaro, Joseph M.

AU - D'Agostino, Ralph B.

AU - Sponseller, Craig A.

AU - Toth, Peter P.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Purpose Remnants are partially hydrolyzed, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins that are implicated in atherosclerosis. We assessed the adequacy of pitavastatin 4 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in reducing atherogenic lipid parameters beyond LDL-C, in particular remnant lipoprotein cholesterol (RLP-C). Methods From the Phase IV, multicenter, randomized, double-blind PREVAIL US (A Study of Pitavastatin 4 mg Vs. Pravastatin 40 mg in Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia) trial, we examined lipoprotein cholesterol subfractions using Vertical Auto Profile testing and apolipoproteins B and A-I at baseline and 12 weeks. Participants with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia had LDL-C levels of 130 to 220 mg/dL and triglyceride levels ≤400 mg/dL. In this post hoc analysis, changes in lipid parameters were compared by using ANCOVA. Findings Lipoprotein subfraction data were available in 312 patients (pitavastatin, n = 157; pravastatin, n = 155). Pitavastatin promoted a greater reduction in RLP-C than pravastatin (-13.6 [8.7] vs -9.3 [9.5] mg/dL). Furthermore, the pitavastatin group reported greater reductions in both components of RLP-C (both, P < 0.001): intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-9.5 [6.3] vs -6.4 [6.6] mg/dL) and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol subfraction 3 (-4.1 [3.5] vs -2.9 [3.8] mg/dL). There were also greater reductions in the major ratios of risk (apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A-I and total cholesterol/HDL-C) (both, P < 0.001). There were no significant changes in HDL-C, its subfractions, or natural log lipoprotein(a)-cholesterol. The mean age was 58.8 ± 8.9 years in the pitavastatin group and 57.0 ± 10.2 years in the pravastatin group. Implications Compared with pravastatin 40 mg daily, pitavastatin 4 mg provided superior reductions in atherogenic lipid parameters beyond LDL-C, including RLP-C. Future studies are needed investigate the clinical implications of lowering directly measured RLP-C as the principal target. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01256476.

AB - Purpose Remnants are partially hydrolyzed, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins that are implicated in atherosclerosis. We assessed the adequacy of pitavastatin 4 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in reducing atherogenic lipid parameters beyond LDL-C, in particular remnant lipoprotein cholesterol (RLP-C). Methods From the Phase IV, multicenter, randomized, double-blind PREVAIL US (A Study of Pitavastatin 4 mg Vs. Pravastatin 40 mg in Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia) trial, we examined lipoprotein cholesterol subfractions using Vertical Auto Profile testing and apolipoproteins B and A-I at baseline and 12 weeks. Participants with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia had LDL-C levels of 130 to 220 mg/dL and triglyceride levels ≤400 mg/dL. In this post hoc analysis, changes in lipid parameters were compared by using ANCOVA. Findings Lipoprotein subfraction data were available in 312 patients (pitavastatin, n = 157; pravastatin, n = 155). Pitavastatin promoted a greater reduction in RLP-C than pravastatin (-13.6 [8.7] vs -9.3 [9.5] mg/dL). Furthermore, the pitavastatin group reported greater reductions in both components of RLP-C (both, P < 0.001): intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-9.5 [6.3] vs -6.4 [6.6] mg/dL) and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol subfraction 3 (-4.1 [3.5] vs -2.9 [3.8] mg/dL). There were also greater reductions in the major ratios of risk (apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A-I and total cholesterol/HDL-C) (both, P < 0.001). There were no significant changes in HDL-C, its subfractions, or natural log lipoprotein(a)-cholesterol. The mean age was 58.8 ± 8.9 years in the pitavastatin group and 57.0 ± 10.2 years in the pravastatin group. Implications Compared with pravastatin 40 mg daily, pitavastatin 4 mg provided superior reductions in atherogenic lipid parameters beyond LDL-C, including RLP-C. Future studies are needed investigate the clinical implications of lowering directly measured RLP-C as the principal target. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01256476.

KW - Key words hyperlipidemia

KW - mixed dyslipidemia

KW - pitavastatin

KW - pravastatin

KW - remnant lipoprotein cholesterol

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960798659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960798659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.02.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 26922296

AN - SCOPUS:84960798659

VL - 38

SP - 603

EP - 609

JO - Clinical Therapeutics

JF - Clinical Therapeutics

SN - 0149-2918

IS - 3

ER -