Playing in their sandbox: Professional obligations of mental health professionals in custody cases

Lyn R. Greenberg, Dianna J. Gould-Saltman, Michael C. Gottlieb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mental health professionals (MHPs) working with court-involved families practice at the interface of psychology and law. MHPs practicing in the legal context are governed by the ethics codes and standards of their profession, but must also adjust their practices to the expectations and standards of the legal arena. The judicial system, mental health, legal and interdisciplinary organizations may present different ethical standards/recommendations, leading to tension and controversy among the various professionals' obligations and concerns. In this article, the authors identify core ethical issues and concepts that underlie most professional practice standards applicable to MHPs in family law cases. Case examples are presented that demonstrate common ethical dilemmas and proactive, effective approaches to avoiding or resolving them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)192-216
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Child Custody
Volume5
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

child custody
health professionals
obligation
Mental Health
mental health
Codes of Ethics
family court
Professional Practice
family law
Family Practice
Ethics
psychology
profession
moral philosophy
Organizations
Psychology
Law

Keywords

  • Boundaries
  • Child custody
  • Ethics
  • Professional relationships
  • Professional responsibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Playing in their sandbox : Professional obligations of mental health professionals in custody cases. / Greenberg, Lyn R.; Gould-Saltman, Dianna J.; Gottlieb, Michael C.

In: Journal of Child Custody, Vol. 5, No. 3-4, 2008, p. 192-216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3931d0662a6948e6b7d8be4c80f85df2,
title = "Playing in their sandbox: Professional obligations of mental health professionals in custody cases",
abstract = "Mental health professionals (MHPs) working with court-involved families practice at the interface of psychology and law. MHPs practicing in the legal context are governed by the ethics codes and standards of their profession, but must also adjust their practices to the expectations and standards of the legal arena. The judicial system, mental health, legal and interdisciplinary organizations may present different ethical standards/recommendations, leading to tension and controversy among the various professionals' obligations and concerns. In this article, the authors identify core ethical issues and concepts that underlie most professional practice standards applicable to MHPs in family law cases. Case examples are presented that demonstrate common ethical dilemmas and proactive, effective approaches to avoiding or resolving them.",
keywords = "Boundaries, Child custody, Ethics, Professional relationships, Professional responsibility",
author = "Greenberg, {Lyn R.} and Gould-Saltman, {Dianna J.} and Gottlieb, {Michael C.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/15379410802583684",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "192--216",
journal = "Journal of Child Custody",
issn = "1537-9418",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Playing in their sandbox

T2 - Professional obligations of mental health professionals in custody cases

AU - Greenberg, Lyn R.

AU - Gould-Saltman, Dianna J.

AU - Gottlieb, Michael C.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Mental health professionals (MHPs) working with court-involved families practice at the interface of psychology and law. MHPs practicing in the legal context are governed by the ethics codes and standards of their profession, but must also adjust their practices to the expectations and standards of the legal arena. The judicial system, mental health, legal and interdisciplinary organizations may present different ethical standards/recommendations, leading to tension and controversy among the various professionals' obligations and concerns. In this article, the authors identify core ethical issues and concepts that underlie most professional practice standards applicable to MHPs in family law cases. Case examples are presented that demonstrate common ethical dilemmas and proactive, effective approaches to avoiding or resolving them.

AB - Mental health professionals (MHPs) working with court-involved families practice at the interface of psychology and law. MHPs practicing in the legal context are governed by the ethics codes and standards of their profession, but must also adjust their practices to the expectations and standards of the legal arena. The judicial system, mental health, legal and interdisciplinary organizations may present different ethical standards/recommendations, leading to tension and controversy among the various professionals' obligations and concerns. In this article, the authors identify core ethical issues and concepts that underlie most professional practice standards applicable to MHPs in family law cases. Case examples are presented that demonstrate common ethical dilemmas and proactive, effective approaches to avoiding or resolving them.

KW - Boundaries

KW - Child custody

KW - Ethics

KW - Professional relationships

KW - Professional responsibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650297492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650297492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15379410802583684

DO - 10.1080/15379410802583684

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67650297492

VL - 5

SP - 192

EP - 216

JO - Journal of Child Custody

JF - Journal of Child Custody

SN - 1537-9418

IS - 3-4

ER -