Postdischarge surveillance for infection following cesarean section: A prospective cohort study comparing methodologies

Muhammad A. Halwani, Alison E. Turnbull, Meredith Harris, Frank Witter, Trish M. Perl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To assess how enhanced postdischarge telephone follow-up calls would improve case finding for surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance after cesarean section. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of all patients who delivered by cesarean section between April 22 and August 22, 2010. In addition to our routine surveillance, using clinical databases and electronic patient records, we also made follow-up calls to the patients at 7, 14, and 30 days postoperation. A standard questionnaire with questions about symptoms of SSI, health-seeking behaviors, and treatment received was administered. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were performed to assess the effect of the enhanced surveillance. Results One hundred ninety-three patients underwent cesarean section during this study period. Standard surveillance identified 14 infections with telephone follow-ups identifying an additional 5 infections. Using the call as a gold standard, the sensitivity of the standard methodology to capture SSI was 73.3%. The duration of the calls ranged from 1 to 5 minutes and were well received by the patients. Conclusions Results suggest that follow-up telephone calls to patients following cesarean section identifies 26.3% of the total SSIs. Enhanced surveillance can provide more informed data to enhance performance and avoid underestimation of rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)455-457
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Cesarean Section
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies
Surgical Wound Infection
Infection
Telephone
Databases
Health

Keywords

  • Cesarean section infection
  • Post-discharge surveillance
  • Surgical site infections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Postdischarge surveillance for infection following cesarean section : A prospective cohort study comparing methodologies. / Halwani, Muhammad A.; Turnbull, Alison E.; Harris, Meredith; Witter, Frank; Perl, Trish M.

In: American Journal of Infection Control, Vol. 44, No. 4, 01.04.2016, p. 455-457.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Halwani, Muhammad A. ; Turnbull, Alison E. ; Harris, Meredith ; Witter, Frank ; Perl, Trish M. / Postdischarge surveillance for infection following cesarean section : A prospective cohort study comparing methodologies. In: American Journal of Infection Control. 2016 ; Vol. 44, No. 4. pp. 455-457.
@article{7279eb4f0b1546a69dab76ed963e7dfe,
title = "Postdischarge surveillance for infection following cesarean section: A prospective cohort study comparing methodologies",
abstract = "Objective To assess how enhanced postdischarge telephone follow-up calls would improve case finding for surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance after cesarean section. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of all patients who delivered by cesarean section between April 22 and August 22, 2010. In addition to our routine surveillance, using clinical databases and electronic patient records, we also made follow-up calls to the patients at 7, 14, and 30 days postoperation. A standard questionnaire with questions about symptoms of SSI, health-seeking behaviors, and treatment received was administered. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were performed to assess the effect of the enhanced surveillance. Results One hundred ninety-three patients underwent cesarean section during this study period. Standard surveillance identified 14 infections with telephone follow-ups identifying an additional 5 infections. Using the call as a gold standard, the sensitivity of the standard methodology to capture SSI was 73.3{\%}. The duration of the calls ranged from 1 to 5 minutes and were well received by the patients. Conclusions Results suggest that follow-up telephone calls to patients following cesarean section identifies 26.3{\%} of the total SSIs. Enhanced surveillance can provide more informed data to enhance performance and avoid underestimation of rates.",
keywords = "Cesarean section infection, Post-discharge surveillance, Surgical site infections",
author = "Halwani, {Muhammad A.} and Turnbull, {Alison E.} and Meredith Harris and Frank Witter and Perl, {Trish M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajic.2015.10.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "455--457",
journal = "American Journal of Infection Control",
issn = "0196-6553",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postdischarge surveillance for infection following cesarean section

T2 - A prospective cohort study comparing methodologies

AU - Halwani, Muhammad A.

AU - Turnbull, Alison E.

AU - Harris, Meredith

AU - Witter, Frank

AU - Perl, Trish M.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Objective To assess how enhanced postdischarge telephone follow-up calls would improve case finding for surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance after cesarean section. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of all patients who delivered by cesarean section between April 22 and August 22, 2010. In addition to our routine surveillance, using clinical databases and electronic patient records, we also made follow-up calls to the patients at 7, 14, and 30 days postoperation. A standard questionnaire with questions about symptoms of SSI, health-seeking behaviors, and treatment received was administered. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were performed to assess the effect of the enhanced surveillance. Results One hundred ninety-three patients underwent cesarean section during this study period. Standard surveillance identified 14 infections with telephone follow-ups identifying an additional 5 infections. Using the call as a gold standard, the sensitivity of the standard methodology to capture SSI was 73.3%. The duration of the calls ranged from 1 to 5 minutes and were well received by the patients. Conclusions Results suggest that follow-up telephone calls to patients following cesarean section identifies 26.3% of the total SSIs. Enhanced surveillance can provide more informed data to enhance performance and avoid underestimation of rates.

AB - Objective To assess how enhanced postdischarge telephone follow-up calls would improve case finding for surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance after cesarean section. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of all patients who delivered by cesarean section between April 22 and August 22, 2010. In addition to our routine surveillance, using clinical databases and electronic patient records, we also made follow-up calls to the patients at 7, 14, and 30 days postoperation. A standard questionnaire with questions about symptoms of SSI, health-seeking behaviors, and treatment received was administered. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were performed to assess the effect of the enhanced surveillance. Results One hundred ninety-three patients underwent cesarean section during this study period. Standard surveillance identified 14 infections with telephone follow-ups identifying an additional 5 infections. Using the call as a gold standard, the sensitivity of the standard methodology to capture SSI was 73.3%. The duration of the calls ranged from 1 to 5 minutes and were well received by the patients. Conclusions Results suggest that follow-up telephone calls to patients following cesarean section identifies 26.3% of the total SSIs. Enhanced surveillance can provide more informed data to enhance performance and avoid underestimation of rates.

KW - Cesarean section infection

KW - Post-discharge surveillance

KW - Surgical site infections

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954305061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954305061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.10.023

DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.10.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 26706153

AN - SCOPUS:84954305061

VL - 44

SP - 455

EP - 457

JO - American Journal of Infection Control

JF - American Journal of Infection Control

SN - 0196-6553

IS - 4

ER -