TY - JOUR
T1 - Postoperative Urinary Retention Rates after Autofill versus Backfill Void Trial following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - Farag, Sara
AU - Padilla, Pamela Frazzini
AU - Smith, Katherine A.
AU - Zimberg, Stephen E.
AU - Sprague, Michael L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 AAGL
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Study Objective: To compare the rate of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) using the autofill vs the backfill void trial. Secondary objectives were to compare the time to discharge from the recovery room, rate of postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI), perceived bladder condition, the effect of bladder function on life, and patient satisfaction. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Single academic medical center. Patients: Women who underwent TLH by conventional laparoscopy or robotic-assisted laparoscopy for benign non-urogynecologic indications. Interventions: After TLH, participants were randomized to have an autofill void trial (group A) or a backfill void trial once they were able to ambulate (group B). Failure rate, time to discharge, and UTI rate were assessed. Participants completed the patient perception of bladder condition and the incontinence impact questionnaire-short form questionnaires. Patient satisfaction was assessed. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of POUR. Measurements and Main Results: Eighty-two participants completed the study after randomization, 42 in group A and 40 in group B. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic or perioperative outcomes. Seven participants had POUR in group A (16.7%) and 11 in group B (27.5%) (p =.36), respectively. The median time to discharge was 176 minutes for group A (160.5, 255.5) and 218 minutes for group B (180, 265) (p =.01), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in rate of postoperative UTI (p >.99), patient perception of bladder condition scores (p =.24), incontinence impact questionnaire-short form scores (p =.23), and patient satisfaction scores (p =.26). A stepwise logistic regression analysis did not demonstrate any predictors of POUR. Conclusion: Backfill void trial once the participant was able to ambulate was not superior to the autofill void trial with respect to the rate of POUR. The autofill void trial resulted in faster same-day discharge.
AB - Study Objective: To compare the rate of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) using the autofill vs the backfill void trial. Secondary objectives were to compare the time to discharge from the recovery room, rate of postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI), perceived bladder condition, the effect of bladder function on life, and patient satisfaction. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Single academic medical center. Patients: Women who underwent TLH by conventional laparoscopy or robotic-assisted laparoscopy for benign non-urogynecologic indications. Interventions: After TLH, participants were randomized to have an autofill void trial (group A) or a backfill void trial once they were able to ambulate (group B). Failure rate, time to discharge, and UTI rate were assessed. Participants completed the patient perception of bladder condition and the incontinence impact questionnaire-short form questionnaires. Patient satisfaction was assessed. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of POUR. Measurements and Main Results: Eighty-two participants completed the study after randomization, 42 in group A and 40 in group B. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic or perioperative outcomes. Seven participants had POUR in group A (16.7%) and 11 in group B (27.5%) (p =.36), respectively. The median time to discharge was 176 minutes for group A (160.5, 255.5) and 218 minutes for group B (180, 265) (p =.01), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in rate of postoperative UTI (p >.99), patient perception of bladder condition scores (p =.24), incontinence impact questionnaire-short form scores (p =.23), and patient satisfaction scores (p =.26). A stepwise logistic regression analysis did not demonstrate any predictors of POUR. Conclusion: Backfill void trial once the participant was able to ambulate was not superior to the autofill void trial with respect to the rate of POUR. The autofill void trial resulted in faster same-day discharge.
KW - Autofill void trial
KW - Minimally invasive hysterectomy
KW - Retrograde void trial
KW - Same day discharge
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090126692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090126692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 32712322
AN - SCOPUS:85090126692
SN - 1553-4650
VL - 28
SP - 829
EP - 837
JO - Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
JF - Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
IS - 4
ER -