Potential impact of adjusting the threshold of the quantitative D-dimer based on pretest probability of acute pulmonary embolism

Christopher Kabrhel, D. Mark Courtney, Carlos A. Camargo, Christopher L. Moore, Peter B. Richman, Michael C. Plewa, Kristen E. Nordenholtz, Howard A. Smithline, Daren M. Beam, Michael D. Brown, Jeffrey A. Kline

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The utility of D-dimer testing for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) can be limited by test specificity. The authors tested if the threshold of the quantitative D-dimer can be varied according to pretest probability (PTP) of PE to increase specificity while maintaining a negative predictive value (NPV) of >99%. Methods: This was a prospective, observational multicenter study of emergency department (ED) patients in the United States. Eligible patients had a diagnostic study ordered to evaluate possible PE. PTP was determined by the clinician's unstructured estimate and the Wells score. Five different D-dimer assays were used. D-dimer test performance was measured using 1) standard thresholds and 2) variable threshold values: twice (for low PTP patients), equal (intermediate PTP patients), or half (high PTP patients) of standard threshold. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) within 45 days required positive imaging plus decision to treat. Results: The authors enrolled 7,940 patients tested for PE, and clinicians ordered a quantitative D-dimer for 4,357 (55%) patients who had PTPs distributed as follows: low (74%), moderate (21%), or high (4%). At standard cutoffs, across all PTP strata, quantitative D-dimer testing had a test sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 91% to 97%), specificity of 58% (95% CI = 56% to 60%), and NPV of 99.5% (95% CI = 99.1% to 99.7%). If variable cutoffs had been used the overall sensitivity would have been 88% (95% CI = 83% to 92%), specificity 75% (95% CI = 74% to 76%), and NPV 99.1% (95% CI = 98.7% to 99.4%). Conclusions: This large multicenter observational sample demonstrates that emergency medicine clinicians currently order a D-dimer in the majority of patients tested for PE, including a large proportion with intermediate PTP and high PTP. Varying the D-dimer's cutoff according to PTP can increase specificity with no measurable decrease in NPV.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-332
Number of pages8
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • D-dimer
  • Decision-making
  • Emergency department
  • Venous thromboembolism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Potential impact of adjusting the threshold of the quantitative D-dimer based on pretest probability of acute pulmonary embolism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kabrhel, C., Courtney, D. M., Camargo, C. A., Moore, C. L., Richman, P. B., Plewa, M. C., Nordenholtz, K. E., Smithline, H. A., Beam, D. M., Brown, M. D., & Kline, J. A. (2009). Potential impact of adjusting the threshold of the quantitative D-dimer based on pretest probability of acute pulmonary embolism. Academic Emergency Medicine, 16(4), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00368.x