Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: Generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory

Kevin P. Weinfurt, Adrian F. Hernandez, Gloria D. Coronado, Lynn L. DeBar, Laura M. Dember, Beverly B. Green, Patrick J. Heagerty, Susan S. Huang, Kathryn T. James, Jeffrey G. Jarvik, Eric B. Larson, Vincent Mor, Richard Platt, Gary E. Rosenthal, Edward J. Septimus, Gregory E. Simon, Karen L. Staman, Jeremy Sugarman, Miguel Vazquez, Douglas ZatzickLesley H. Curtis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The clinical research enterprise is not producing the evidence decision makers arguably need in a timely and cost effective manner; research currently involves the use of labor-intensive parallel systems that are separate from clinical care. The emergence of pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) poses a possible solution: these large-scale trials are embedded within routine clinical care and often involve cluster randomization of hospitals, clinics, primary care providers, etc. Interventions can be implemented by health system personnel through usual communication channels and quality improvement infrastructure, and data collected as part of routine clinical care. However, experience with these trials is nascent and best practices regarding design operational, analytic, and reporting methodologies are undeveloped. Methods: To strengthen the national capacity to implement cost-effective, large-scale PCTs, the Common Fund of the National Institutes of Health created the Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory (Collaboratory) to support the design, execution, and dissemination of a series of demonstration projects using a pragmatic research design. Results: In this article, we will describe the Collaboratory, highlight some of the challenges encountered and solutions developed thus far, and discuss remaining barriers and opportunities for large-scale evidence generation using PCTs. Conclusion: A planning phase is critical, and even with careful planning, new challenges arise during execution; comparisons between arms can be complicated by unanticipated changes. Early and ongoing engagement with both health care system leaders and front-line clinicians is critical for success. There is also marked uncertainty when applying existing ethical and regulatory frameworks to PCTS, and using existing electronic health records for data capture adds complexity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number144
JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 18 2017

Keywords

  • Cluster randomized trials
  • Embedded clinical trials
  • Pragmatic clinical research
  • Pragmatic research
  • Stakeholder engagement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Informatics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: Generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Weinfurt, K. P., Hernandez, A. F., Coronado, G. D., DeBar, L. L., Dember, L. M., Green, B. B., Heagerty, P. J., Huang, S. S., James, K. T., Jarvik, J. G., Larson, E. B., Mor, V., Platt, R., Rosenthal, G. E., Septimus, E. J., Simon, G. E., Staman, K. L., Sugarman, J., Vazquez, M., ... Curtis, L. H. (2017). Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: Generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), [144]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0420-7