Predicting outcome on admission and post-admission for acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure using classification and regression tree models

US Acute Liver Failure Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aim: Assessing prognosis for acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure (APAP-ALF) patients often presents significant challenges. King's College (KCC) has been validated on hospital admission, but little has been published on later phases of illness. We aimed to improve determinations of prognosis both at the time of and following admission for APAP-ALF using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) models. Methods: CART models were applied to US ALFSG registry data to predict 21-day death or liver transplant early (on admission) and post-admission (days 3-7) for 803 APAP-ALF patients enrolled 01/1998-09/2013. Accuracy in prediction of outcome (AC), sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), and area under receiver-operating curve (AUROC) were compared between 3 models: KCC (INR, creatinine, coma grade, pH), CART analysis using only KCC variables (KCC-CART) and a CART model using new variables (NEW-CART). Results: Traditional KCC yielded 69% AC, 90% SP, 27% SN, and 0.58 AUROC on admission, with similar performance post-admission. KCC-CART at admission offered predictive 66% AC, 65% SP, 67% SN, and 0.74 AUROC. Post-admission, KCC-CART had predictive 82% AC, 86% SP, 46% SN and 0.81 AUROC. NEW-CART models using MELD (Model for end stage liver disease), lactate and mechanical ventilation on admission yielded predictive 72% AC, 71% SP, 77% SN and AUROC 0.79. For later stages, NEW-CART (MELD, lactate, coma grade) offered predictive AC 86%, SP 91%, SN 46%, AUROC 0.73. Conclusion: CARTs offer simple prognostic models for APAP-ALF patients, which have higher AUROC and SN than KCC, with similar AC and negligibly worse SP. Admission and post-admission predictions were developed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0122929
JournalPLoS One
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 17 2015

Fingerprint

acetaminophen
liver failure
Acute Liver Failure
Acetaminophen
Liver
prognosis
Sensitivity and Specificity
coma
End Stage Liver Disease
liver diseases
Coma
lactates
Lactic Acid
liver transplant
Transplants
International Normalized Ratio
prediction
Artificial Respiration
creatinine
Registries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Predicting outcome on admission and post-admission for acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure using classification and regression tree models. / US Acute Liver Failure Study Group.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 10, No. 4, e0122929, 17.04.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0c8b110eda254469a3062a7d8b734f29,
title = "Predicting outcome on admission and post-admission for acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure using classification and regression tree models",
abstract = "Background/Aim: Assessing prognosis for acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure (APAP-ALF) patients often presents significant challenges. King's College (KCC) has been validated on hospital admission, but little has been published on later phases of illness. We aimed to improve determinations of prognosis both at the time of and following admission for APAP-ALF using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) models. Methods: CART models were applied to US ALFSG registry data to predict 21-day death or liver transplant early (on admission) and post-admission (days 3-7) for 803 APAP-ALF patients enrolled 01/1998-09/2013. Accuracy in prediction of outcome (AC), sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), and area under receiver-operating curve (AUROC) were compared between 3 models: KCC (INR, creatinine, coma grade, pH), CART analysis using only KCC variables (KCC-CART) and a CART model using new variables (NEW-CART). Results: Traditional KCC yielded 69{\%} AC, 90{\%} SP, 27{\%} SN, and 0.58 AUROC on admission, with similar performance post-admission. KCC-CART at admission offered predictive 66{\%} AC, 65{\%} SP, 67{\%} SN, and 0.74 AUROC. Post-admission, KCC-CART had predictive 82{\%} AC, 86{\%} SP, 46{\%} SN and 0.81 AUROC. NEW-CART models using MELD (Model for end stage liver disease), lactate and mechanical ventilation on admission yielded predictive 72{\%} AC, 71{\%} SP, 77{\%} SN and AUROC 0.79. For later stages, NEW-CART (MELD, lactate, coma grade) offered predictive AC 86{\%}, SP 91{\%}, SN 46{\%}, AUROC 0.73. Conclusion: CARTs offer simple prognostic models for APAP-ALF patients, which have higher AUROC and SN than KCC, with similar AC and negligibly worse SP. Admission and post-admission predictions were developed.",
author = "{US Acute Liver Failure Study Group} and Speiser, {Jaime Lynn} and Lee, {William M.} and Karvellas, {Constantine J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0122929",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting outcome on admission and post-admission for acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure using classification and regression tree models

AU - US Acute Liver Failure Study Group

AU - Speiser, Jaime Lynn

AU - Lee, William M.

AU - Karvellas, Constantine J.

PY - 2015/4/17

Y1 - 2015/4/17

N2 - Background/Aim: Assessing prognosis for acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure (APAP-ALF) patients often presents significant challenges. King's College (KCC) has been validated on hospital admission, but little has been published on later phases of illness. We aimed to improve determinations of prognosis both at the time of and following admission for APAP-ALF using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) models. Methods: CART models were applied to US ALFSG registry data to predict 21-day death or liver transplant early (on admission) and post-admission (days 3-7) for 803 APAP-ALF patients enrolled 01/1998-09/2013. Accuracy in prediction of outcome (AC), sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), and area under receiver-operating curve (AUROC) were compared between 3 models: KCC (INR, creatinine, coma grade, pH), CART analysis using only KCC variables (KCC-CART) and a CART model using new variables (NEW-CART). Results: Traditional KCC yielded 69% AC, 90% SP, 27% SN, and 0.58 AUROC on admission, with similar performance post-admission. KCC-CART at admission offered predictive 66% AC, 65% SP, 67% SN, and 0.74 AUROC. Post-admission, KCC-CART had predictive 82% AC, 86% SP, 46% SN and 0.81 AUROC. NEW-CART models using MELD (Model for end stage liver disease), lactate and mechanical ventilation on admission yielded predictive 72% AC, 71% SP, 77% SN and AUROC 0.79. For later stages, NEW-CART (MELD, lactate, coma grade) offered predictive AC 86%, SP 91%, SN 46%, AUROC 0.73. Conclusion: CARTs offer simple prognostic models for APAP-ALF patients, which have higher AUROC and SN than KCC, with similar AC and negligibly worse SP. Admission and post-admission predictions were developed.

AB - Background/Aim: Assessing prognosis for acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure (APAP-ALF) patients often presents significant challenges. King's College (KCC) has been validated on hospital admission, but little has been published on later phases of illness. We aimed to improve determinations of prognosis both at the time of and following admission for APAP-ALF using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) models. Methods: CART models were applied to US ALFSG registry data to predict 21-day death or liver transplant early (on admission) and post-admission (days 3-7) for 803 APAP-ALF patients enrolled 01/1998-09/2013. Accuracy in prediction of outcome (AC), sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), and area under receiver-operating curve (AUROC) were compared between 3 models: KCC (INR, creatinine, coma grade, pH), CART analysis using only KCC variables (KCC-CART) and a CART model using new variables (NEW-CART). Results: Traditional KCC yielded 69% AC, 90% SP, 27% SN, and 0.58 AUROC on admission, with similar performance post-admission. KCC-CART at admission offered predictive 66% AC, 65% SP, 67% SN, and 0.74 AUROC. Post-admission, KCC-CART had predictive 82% AC, 86% SP, 46% SN and 0.81 AUROC. NEW-CART models using MELD (Model for end stage liver disease), lactate and mechanical ventilation on admission yielded predictive 72% AC, 71% SP, 77% SN and AUROC 0.79. For later stages, NEW-CART (MELD, lactate, coma grade) offered predictive AC 86%, SP 91%, SN 46%, AUROC 0.73. Conclusion: CARTs offer simple prognostic models for APAP-ALF patients, which have higher AUROC and SN than KCC, with similar AC and negligibly worse SP. Admission and post-admission predictions were developed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929484506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929484506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0122929

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0122929

M3 - Article

C2 - 25885260

AN - SCOPUS:84929484506

VL - 10

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 4

M1 - e0122929

ER -