Prehospital countershock treatment of pediatric asystole

Joseph D. Losek, Halim Hennes, Peter W. Glaeser, Douglas S. Smith, Gail Hendley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prehospital care was retrospectively reviewed in 117 pulseless nonbreathing (PNB) pediatric patients (0 to 18 years of age) to determine the effects of immediate countershock treatment of asystole. Of 90 (77%) children with an initial rhythm of asystole, 49 (54%) received countershock treatment. Rhythm change occurred in ten (20%) of the asystolic children who received countershock treatment. Three of the countershocked asystolic children were successfully resuscitated, but none survived. Rhythm change occurred in nine (22%) of the asystolic children not countershocked. Six were successfully resuscitated, and one survived. The two groups (countershocked asystole v noncountershocked asystole) did not differ significantly in age, sex, witnessed arrest, witnessed arrest with bystander basic life support (BLS), prehospital endotracheal intubation, both intubation and vascular access success, or diagnosis. However, prehospital vascular access was successfully establlshed in a significantly greater number of countershocked patients (P < .05). The mean times to the scene, at the scene, and to the hospital for the countershocked v noncountershocked asystolic patients were 6.2, 23.8, and 6.1 v 5.9, 14.7 and 7.0 minutes. The mean time at the scene was significantly greater in the countershock group (P < .001). The successful performance of prehospital endotracheal intubation was significantly associated with rhythm change (P < .05). Patient's age, witnessed arrest, witnessed arrest with bystander BLS, successful establishment of prehospital vascular access, diagnosis, and countershock treatment were not significantly associated with rhythm change. In conclusion, prehospital countershock treatment prolonged prehospital care time and was not associated with rhythm change in asystolic children. Therefore, prehospital countershock treatment of asystolic children is not recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)571-575
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Heart Arrest
Pediatrics
Blood Vessels
Intratracheal Intubation
Therapeutics
Intubation

Keywords

  • asystole
  • Countershock

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Prehospital countershock treatment of pediatric asystole. / Losek, Joseph D.; Hennes, Halim; Glaeser, Peter W.; Smith, Douglas S.; Hendley, Gail.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 6, 1989, p. 571-575.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Losek, Joseph D. ; Hennes, Halim ; Glaeser, Peter W. ; Smith, Douglas S. ; Hendley, Gail. / Prehospital countershock treatment of pediatric asystole. In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 1989 ; Vol. 7, No. 6. pp. 571-575.
@article{1f9003477b804a0b9a1acab18e1a1175,
title = "Prehospital countershock treatment of pediatric asystole",
abstract = "Prehospital care was retrospectively reviewed in 117 pulseless nonbreathing (PNB) pediatric patients (0 to 18 years of age) to determine the effects of immediate countershock treatment of asystole. Of 90 (77{\%}) children with an initial rhythm of asystole, 49 (54{\%}) received countershock treatment. Rhythm change occurred in ten (20{\%}) of the asystolic children who received countershock treatment. Three of the countershocked asystolic children were successfully resuscitated, but none survived. Rhythm change occurred in nine (22{\%}) of the asystolic children not countershocked. Six were successfully resuscitated, and one survived. The two groups (countershocked asystole v noncountershocked asystole) did not differ significantly in age, sex, witnessed arrest, witnessed arrest with bystander basic life support (BLS), prehospital endotracheal intubation, both intubation and vascular access success, or diagnosis. However, prehospital vascular access was successfully establlshed in a significantly greater number of countershocked patients (P < .05). The mean times to the scene, at the scene, and to the hospital for the countershocked v noncountershocked asystolic patients were 6.2, 23.8, and 6.1 v 5.9, 14.7 and 7.0 minutes. The mean time at the scene was significantly greater in the countershock group (P < .001). The successful performance of prehospital endotracheal intubation was significantly associated with rhythm change (P < .05). Patient's age, witnessed arrest, witnessed arrest with bystander BLS, successful establishment of prehospital vascular access, diagnosis, and countershock treatment were not significantly associated with rhythm change. In conclusion, prehospital countershock treatment prolonged prehospital care time and was not associated with rhythm change in asystolic children. Therefore, prehospital countershock treatment of asystolic children is not recommended.",
keywords = "asystole, Countershock",
author = "Losek, {Joseph D.} and Halim Hennes and Glaeser, {Peter W.} and Smith, {Douglas S.} and Gail Hendley",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1016/0735-6757(89)90276-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "571--575",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prehospital countershock treatment of pediatric asystole

AU - Losek, Joseph D.

AU - Hennes, Halim

AU - Glaeser, Peter W.

AU - Smith, Douglas S.

AU - Hendley, Gail

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Prehospital care was retrospectively reviewed in 117 pulseless nonbreathing (PNB) pediatric patients (0 to 18 years of age) to determine the effects of immediate countershock treatment of asystole. Of 90 (77%) children with an initial rhythm of asystole, 49 (54%) received countershock treatment. Rhythm change occurred in ten (20%) of the asystolic children who received countershock treatment. Three of the countershocked asystolic children were successfully resuscitated, but none survived. Rhythm change occurred in nine (22%) of the asystolic children not countershocked. Six were successfully resuscitated, and one survived. The two groups (countershocked asystole v noncountershocked asystole) did not differ significantly in age, sex, witnessed arrest, witnessed arrest with bystander basic life support (BLS), prehospital endotracheal intubation, both intubation and vascular access success, or diagnosis. However, prehospital vascular access was successfully establlshed in a significantly greater number of countershocked patients (P < .05). The mean times to the scene, at the scene, and to the hospital for the countershocked v noncountershocked asystolic patients were 6.2, 23.8, and 6.1 v 5.9, 14.7 and 7.0 minutes. The mean time at the scene was significantly greater in the countershock group (P < .001). The successful performance of prehospital endotracheal intubation was significantly associated with rhythm change (P < .05). Patient's age, witnessed arrest, witnessed arrest with bystander BLS, successful establishment of prehospital vascular access, diagnosis, and countershock treatment were not significantly associated with rhythm change. In conclusion, prehospital countershock treatment prolonged prehospital care time and was not associated with rhythm change in asystolic children. Therefore, prehospital countershock treatment of asystolic children is not recommended.

AB - Prehospital care was retrospectively reviewed in 117 pulseless nonbreathing (PNB) pediatric patients (0 to 18 years of age) to determine the effects of immediate countershock treatment of asystole. Of 90 (77%) children with an initial rhythm of asystole, 49 (54%) received countershock treatment. Rhythm change occurred in ten (20%) of the asystolic children who received countershock treatment. Three of the countershocked asystolic children were successfully resuscitated, but none survived. Rhythm change occurred in nine (22%) of the asystolic children not countershocked. Six were successfully resuscitated, and one survived. The two groups (countershocked asystole v noncountershocked asystole) did not differ significantly in age, sex, witnessed arrest, witnessed arrest with bystander basic life support (BLS), prehospital endotracheal intubation, both intubation and vascular access success, or diagnosis. However, prehospital vascular access was successfully establlshed in a significantly greater number of countershocked patients (P < .05). The mean times to the scene, at the scene, and to the hospital for the countershocked v noncountershocked asystolic patients were 6.2, 23.8, and 6.1 v 5.9, 14.7 and 7.0 minutes. The mean time at the scene was significantly greater in the countershock group (P < .001). The successful performance of prehospital endotracheal intubation was significantly associated with rhythm change (P < .05). Patient's age, witnessed arrest, witnessed arrest with bystander BLS, successful establishment of prehospital vascular access, diagnosis, and countershock treatment were not significantly associated with rhythm change. In conclusion, prehospital countershock treatment prolonged prehospital care time and was not associated with rhythm change in asystolic children. Therefore, prehospital countershock treatment of asystolic children is not recommended.

KW - asystole

KW - Countershock

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024417942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024417942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0735-6757(89)90276-3

DO - 10.1016/0735-6757(89)90276-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 2679575

AN - SCOPUS:0024417942

VL - 7

SP - 571

EP - 575

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 6

ER -