Prehospital management of trauma

A tale of three cities

Paul E. Pepe, Ronald D. Stewart, Michael K. Copass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The controversies that have surrounded the prehospital management of trauma stem not only from a lack of appropriate evaluation data, but also from a lack of medical accountability and "street-wise," academic physician involvement within emergency medical services (EMS) systems. As a result, the approach to EMS trauma care has often been over-generalized and debated in terms of simplistic, unidimensional concepts, such as "scoop and run" versus "field stabilization," without any regard for the type and anatomic location of injury involved, the efficiency and skill of rescuers, the proximity and actual capabilities of definitive care resources, and the logistics of the prehospital setting. The failure to understand and delineate these variables has led to conflicting studies and has confused the analysis of potential therapeutic modalities and management strategies. In view of this, a survey is provided of three major cities, each with intensive, academic physician involvement in their EMS systems, and the approach and rationale for their prehospital care strategies are summarized. In all three systems, patients generally are categorized according to three major injury types (penetrating, blunt, and thermal) and then further subcategorized with regard to anatomical involvement, specifically those involving potential (or known) internal truncal injuries versus those with isolated head trauma or isolated extremity injury. For all three, high-flow O2 delivery and aggressive, advanced airway management (by endotracheal intubation whenever feasible) are keystones of management. In cases of potential or known internal truncal injury, the priority is also expeditious transport to facilities with definitive surgical care with the establishment of IV access and rapid fluid infusions en route. However, in the majority of cases encountered by EMS personnel, careful and meticulous splinting, extrication, and cervical spine immobilization are indicated prior to patient movement. Therefore, rapid evacuation is not always recommended, particularly in those victims of low-velocity vehicular accidents, beatings, or falls who are alert, unintoxicated, and free of any symptoms or findings suggestive of truncal injury. IV fluid resuscitation can also be initiated on-scene in the majority of patients with controlled or self-limited non-truncal hemorrhage. The unconscious patient with blunt head trauma is perhaps the most challenging in prehospital care. While emphasis must be placed primarily on the provision of adequate lung inflation (tidal volume of 15 mL/kg) with high O2 flows, the maintenance of adequate blood pressure, and cervical immobilization, followed by attempts at mild hyperventilation (usually rates of 15 to 18 breaths/min), these critical interventions must be balanced with the need for rapid evacuation as the noncommunicative patient must always be assumed to have potential internal truncal injuries and/or hemorrhage. The decision to transport to a trauma center should not be based solely on injury scoring indices, but must also take into consideration the mechanism of injury. Rural EMS care must be recognized as unique and deserving of special study. Interpretations of studies evaluating the efficacy of aeromedical programs must take into account multiple variables, including injury types, speed of evacuation to trauma centers, level of care provided by air and ground crews, and other medical elements of the system. Outcome data should be collected and analyzed in terms of the patient's return to previous employment and social status, as well as in-hospital morbidity and costs of medical care. The intense involvement of "street-wise" physicians who are familiar with the prehospital environment appears to enhance the efficacy of prehospital system design and medical care. Emergency medical curricula should reflect the growing need to provide role models and train physicians to assume leadership roles in prehospital medical management and research. Responsible EMS research will be crucial in answering the many questions and uncertainties sorrounding prehospital trauma care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1484-1490
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume15
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Emergency Medical Services
Physicians
Trauma Centers
Craniocerebral Trauma
Immobilization
Biomedical Research
Hemorrhage
Nonpenetrating Wounds
Airway Management
Intratracheal Intubation
Hyperventilation
Hospital Costs
Tidal Volume
Social Responsibility
Economic Inflation
Systems Analysis
Resuscitation
Curriculum
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • prehospital care, trauma
  • trauma, prehospital management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Prehospital management of trauma : A tale of three cities. / Pepe, Paul E.; Stewart, Ronald D.; Copass, Michael K.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 12, 1986, p. 1484-1490.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pepe, Paul E. ; Stewart, Ronald D. ; Copass, Michael K. / Prehospital management of trauma : A tale of three cities. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1986 ; Vol. 15, No. 12. pp. 1484-1490.
@article{d020fbc0e2dc4e75a47e7baba19aff8d,
title = "Prehospital management of trauma: A tale of three cities",
abstract = "The controversies that have surrounded the prehospital management of trauma stem not only from a lack of appropriate evaluation data, but also from a lack of medical accountability and {"}street-wise,{"} academic physician involvement within emergency medical services (EMS) systems. As a result, the approach to EMS trauma care has often been over-generalized and debated in terms of simplistic, unidimensional concepts, such as {"}scoop and run{"} versus {"}field stabilization,{"} without any regard for the type and anatomic location of injury involved, the efficiency and skill of rescuers, the proximity and actual capabilities of definitive care resources, and the logistics of the prehospital setting. The failure to understand and delineate these variables has led to conflicting studies and has confused the analysis of potential therapeutic modalities and management strategies. In view of this, a survey is provided of three major cities, each with intensive, academic physician involvement in their EMS systems, and the approach and rationale for their prehospital care strategies are summarized. In all three systems, patients generally are categorized according to three major injury types (penetrating, blunt, and thermal) and then further subcategorized with regard to anatomical involvement, specifically those involving potential (or known) internal truncal injuries versus those with isolated head trauma or isolated extremity injury. For all three, high-flow O2 delivery and aggressive, advanced airway management (by endotracheal intubation whenever feasible) are keystones of management. In cases of potential or known internal truncal injury, the priority is also expeditious transport to facilities with definitive surgical care with the establishment of IV access and rapid fluid infusions en route. However, in the majority of cases encountered by EMS personnel, careful and meticulous splinting, extrication, and cervical spine immobilization are indicated prior to patient movement. Therefore, rapid evacuation is not always recommended, particularly in those victims of low-velocity vehicular accidents, beatings, or falls who are alert, unintoxicated, and free of any symptoms or findings suggestive of truncal injury. IV fluid resuscitation can also be initiated on-scene in the majority of patients with controlled or self-limited non-truncal hemorrhage. The unconscious patient with blunt head trauma is perhaps the most challenging in prehospital care. While emphasis must be placed primarily on the provision of adequate lung inflation (tidal volume of 15 mL/kg) with high O2 flows, the maintenance of adequate blood pressure, and cervical immobilization, followed by attempts at mild hyperventilation (usually rates of 15 to 18 breaths/min), these critical interventions must be balanced with the need for rapid evacuation as the noncommunicative patient must always be assumed to have potential internal truncal injuries and/or hemorrhage. The decision to transport to a trauma center should not be based solely on injury scoring indices, but must also take into consideration the mechanism of injury. Rural EMS care must be recognized as unique and deserving of special study. Interpretations of studies evaluating the efficacy of aeromedical programs must take into account multiple variables, including injury types, speed of evacuation to trauma centers, level of care provided by air and ground crews, and other medical elements of the system. Outcome data should be collected and analyzed in terms of the patient's return to previous employment and social status, as well as in-hospital morbidity and costs of medical care. The intense involvement of {"}street-wise{"} physicians who are familiar with the prehospital environment appears to enhance the efficacy of prehospital system design and medical care. Emergency medical curricula should reflect the growing need to provide role models and train physicians to assume leadership roles in prehospital medical management and research. Responsible EMS research will be crucial in answering the many questions and uncertainties sorrounding prehospital trauma care.",
keywords = "prehospital care, trauma, trauma, prehospital management",
author = "Pepe, {Paul E.} and Stewart, {Ronald D.} and Copass, {Michael K.}",
year = "1986",
doi = "10.1016/S0196-0644(86)80949-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1484--1490",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prehospital management of trauma

T2 - A tale of three cities

AU - Pepe, Paul E.

AU - Stewart, Ronald D.

AU - Copass, Michael K.

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - The controversies that have surrounded the prehospital management of trauma stem not only from a lack of appropriate evaluation data, but also from a lack of medical accountability and "street-wise," academic physician involvement within emergency medical services (EMS) systems. As a result, the approach to EMS trauma care has often been over-generalized and debated in terms of simplistic, unidimensional concepts, such as "scoop and run" versus "field stabilization," without any regard for the type and anatomic location of injury involved, the efficiency and skill of rescuers, the proximity and actual capabilities of definitive care resources, and the logistics of the prehospital setting. The failure to understand and delineate these variables has led to conflicting studies and has confused the analysis of potential therapeutic modalities and management strategies. In view of this, a survey is provided of three major cities, each with intensive, academic physician involvement in their EMS systems, and the approach and rationale for their prehospital care strategies are summarized. In all three systems, patients generally are categorized according to three major injury types (penetrating, blunt, and thermal) and then further subcategorized with regard to anatomical involvement, specifically those involving potential (or known) internal truncal injuries versus those with isolated head trauma or isolated extremity injury. For all three, high-flow O2 delivery and aggressive, advanced airway management (by endotracheal intubation whenever feasible) are keystones of management. In cases of potential or known internal truncal injury, the priority is also expeditious transport to facilities with definitive surgical care with the establishment of IV access and rapid fluid infusions en route. However, in the majority of cases encountered by EMS personnel, careful and meticulous splinting, extrication, and cervical spine immobilization are indicated prior to patient movement. Therefore, rapid evacuation is not always recommended, particularly in those victims of low-velocity vehicular accidents, beatings, or falls who are alert, unintoxicated, and free of any symptoms or findings suggestive of truncal injury. IV fluid resuscitation can also be initiated on-scene in the majority of patients with controlled or self-limited non-truncal hemorrhage. The unconscious patient with blunt head trauma is perhaps the most challenging in prehospital care. While emphasis must be placed primarily on the provision of adequate lung inflation (tidal volume of 15 mL/kg) with high O2 flows, the maintenance of adequate blood pressure, and cervical immobilization, followed by attempts at mild hyperventilation (usually rates of 15 to 18 breaths/min), these critical interventions must be balanced with the need for rapid evacuation as the noncommunicative patient must always be assumed to have potential internal truncal injuries and/or hemorrhage. The decision to transport to a trauma center should not be based solely on injury scoring indices, but must also take into consideration the mechanism of injury. Rural EMS care must be recognized as unique and deserving of special study. Interpretations of studies evaluating the efficacy of aeromedical programs must take into account multiple variables, including injury types, speed of evacuation to trauma centers, level of care provided by air and ground crews, and other medical elements of the system. Outcome data should be collected and analyzed in terms of the patient's return to previous employment and social status, as well as in-hospital morbidity and costs of medical care. The intense involvement of "street-wise" physicians who are familiar with the prehospital environment appears to enhance the efficacy of prehospital system design and medical care. Emergency medical curricula should reflect the growing need to provide role models and train physicians to assume leadership roles in prehospital medical management and research. Responsible EMS research will be crucial in answering the many questions and uncertainties sorrounding prehospital trauma care.

AB - The controversies that have surrounded the prehospital management of trauma stem not only from a lack of appropriate evaluation data, but also from a lack of medical accountability and "street-wise," academic physician involvement within emergency medical services (EMS) systems. As a result, the approach to EMS trauma care has often been over-generalized and debated in terms of simplistic, unidimensional concepts, such as "scoop and run" versus "field stabilization," without any regard for the type and anatomic location of injury involved, the efficiency and skill of rescuers, the proximity and actual capabilities of definitive care resources, and the logistics of the prehospital setting. The failure to understand and delineate these variables has led to conflicting studies and has confused the analysis of potential therapeutic modalities and management strategies. In view of this, a survey is provided of three major cities, each with intensive, academic physician involvement in their EMS systems, and the approach and rationale for their prehospital care strategies are summarized. In all three systems, patients generally are categorized according to three major injury types (penetrating, blunt, and thermal) and then further subcategorized with regard to anatomical involvement, specifically those involving potential (or known) internal truncal injuries versus those with isolated head trauma or isolated extremity injury. For all three, high-flow O2 delivery and aggressive, advanced airway management (by endotracheal intubation whenever feasible) are keystones of management. In cases of potential or known internal truncal injury, the priority is also expeditious transport to facilities with definitive surgical care with the establishment of IV access and rapid fluid infusions en route. However, in the majority of cases encountered by EMS personnel, careful and meticulous splinting, extrication, and cervical spine immobilization are indicated prior to patient movement. Therefore, rapid evacuation is not always recommended, particularly in those victims of low-velocity vehicular accidents, beatings, or falls who are alert, unintoxicated, and free of any symptoms or findings suggestive of truncal injury. IV fluid resuscitation can also be initiated on-scene in the majority of patients with controlled or self-limited non-truncal hemorrhage. The unconscious patient with blunt head trauma is perhaps the most challenging in prehospital care. While emphasis must be placed primarily on the provision of adequate lung inflation (tidal volume of 15 mL/kg) with high O2 flows, the maintenance of adequate blood pressure, and cervical immobilization, followed by attempts at mild hyperventilation (usually rates of 15 to 18 breaths/min), these critical interventions must be balanced with the need for rapid evacuation as the noncommunicative patient must always be assumed to have potential internal truncal injuries and/or hemorrhage. The decision to transport to a trauma center should not be based solely on injury scoring indices, but must also take into consideration the mechanism of injury. Rural EMS care must be recognized as unique and deserving of special study. Interpretations of studies evaluating the efficacy of aeromedical programs must take into account multiple variables, including injury types, speed of evacuation to trauma centers, level of care provided by air and ground crews, and other medical elements of the system. Outcome data should be collected and analyzed in terms of the patient's return to previous employment and social status, as well as in-hospital morbidity and costs of medical care. The intense involvement of "street-wise" physicians who are familiar with the prehospital environment appears to enhance the efficacy of prehospital system design and medical care. Emergency medical curricula should reflect the growing need to provide role models and train physicians to assume leadership roles in prehospital medical management and research. Responsible EMS research will be crucial in answering the many questions and uncertainties sorrounding prehospital trauma care.

KW - prehospital care, trauma

KW - trauma, prehospital management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023008511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023008511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0196-0644(86)80949-0

DO - 10.1016/S0196-0644(86)80949-0

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 1484

EP - 1490

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 12

ER -