Prenatal depression in women hospitalized for obstetric risk

Anna R. Brandon, Madhukar H. Trivedi, Linda S. Hynan, Paula D. Miltenberger, Dana Broussard Labat, Jamie B. Rifkin, C. Allen Stringer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Little is known about depression during pregnancy in women with high maternal or fetal risk, as this population is often excluded from research samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate depressive symptoms and known risk factors for depression in a group of women hospitalized with severe obstetric risk. Method: In the antenatal unit, 129 inpatients completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), and the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS) from October 2005 through December 2006. A subset of women were administered the Mood Disorders module of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders based on a score of ≥ 11 on the EPDS. Obstetric complications were classified according to the Hobel Risk Assessment for Prematurity. Results: Fifty-seven of the 129 women (44.2%) scored 11 or greater on the EPDS, and at least 25/129 (19.4%) met the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder. Mothers reporting high attachment to the fetus on the MAAS reported lower severity of depressive symptoms (rho = -0.33, p < .0001); those reporting interpersonal relationship dissatisfaction on the DAS endorsed higher depressive severity (rho = -0.21, p = .02). Severity of obstetric risk was unrelated to depression, but one complication, incompetent cervix, was positively associated with level of depressive symptomatology. Conclusion: Findings indicate a higher prevalence rate of major depressive disorder in women with severe obstetric risk than that reported in low-risk pregnancy samples, suggesting the need for routine depression screening to identify those who need treatment. Fewer depressive symptoms were reported by mothers reporting strong maternal fetal attachment and greater relationship satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)635-643
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychiatry
Volume69
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Obstetrics
Depression
Mothers
Postpartum Depression
Social Adjustment
Major Depressive Disorder
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Uterine Cervical Incompetence
Pregnancy
Mood Disorders
Inpatients
Fetus
Interviews
Research
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Brandon, A. R., Trivedi, M. H., Hynan, L. S., Miltenberger, P. D., Labat, D. B., Rifkin, J. B., & Stringer, C. A. (2008). Prenatal depression in women hospitalized for obstetric risk. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69(4), 635-643.

Prenatal depression in women hospitalized for obstetric risk. / Brandon, Anna R.; Trivedi, Madhukar H.; Hynan, Linda S.; Miltenberger, Paula D.; Labat, Dana Broussard; Rifkin, Jamie B.; Stringer, C. Allen.

In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 69, No. 4, 04.2008, p. 635-643.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brandon, AR, Trivedi, MH, Hynan, LS, Miltenberger, PD, Labat, DB, Rifkin, JB & Stringer, CA 2008, 'Prenatal depression in women hospitalized for obstetric risk', Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 635-643.
Brandon AR, Trivedi MH, Hynan LS, Miltenberger PD, Labat DB, Rifkin JB et al. Prenatal depression in women hospitalized for obstetric risk. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;69(4):635-643.
Brandon, Anna R. ; Trivedi, Madhukar H. ; Hynan, Linda S. ; Miltenberger, Paula D. ; Labat, Dana Broussard ; Rifkin, Jamie B. ; Stringer, C. Allen. / Prenatal depression in women hospitalized for obstetric risk. In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2008 ; Vol. 69, No. 4. pp. 635-643.
@article{61006662e71d4e138ac4c30df7d954be,
title = "Prenatal depression in women hospitalized for obstetric risk",
abstract = "Objective: Little is known about depression during pregnancy in women with high maternal or fetal risk, as this population is often excluded from research samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate depressive symptoms and known risk factors for depression in a group of women hospitalized with severe obstetric risk. Method: In the antenatal unit, 129 inpatients completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), and the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS) from October 2005 through December 2006. A subset of women were administered the Mood Disorders module of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders based on a score of ≥ 11 on the EPDS. Obstetric complications were classified according to the Hobel Risk Assessment for Prematurity. Results: Fifty-seven of the 129 women (44.2{\%}) scored 11 or greater on the EPDS, and at least 25/129 (19.4{\%}) met the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder. Mothers reporting high attachment to the fetus on the MAAS reported lower severity of depressive symptoms (rho = -0.33, p < .0001); those reporting interpersonal relationship dissatisfaction on the DAS endorsed higher depressive severity (rho = -0.21, p = .02). Severity of obstetric risk was unrelated to depression, but one complication, incompetent cervix, was positively associated with level of depressive symptomatology. Conclusion: Findings indicate a higher prevalence rate of major depressive disorder in women with severe obstetric risk than that reported in low-risk pregnancy samples, suggesting the need for routine depression screening to identify those who need treatment. Fewer depressive symptoms were reported by mothers reporting strong maternal fetal attachment and greater relationship satisfaction.",
author = "Brandon, {Anna R.} and Trivedi, {Madhukar H.} and Hynan, {Linda S.} and Miltenberger, {Paula D.} and Labat, {Dana Broussard} and Rifkin, {Jamie B.} and Stringer, {C. Allen}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "635--643",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Psychiatry",
issn = "0160-6689",
publisher = "Physicians Postgraduate Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prenatal depression in women hospitalized for obstetric risk

AU - Brandon, Anna R.

AU - Trivedi, Madhukar H.

AU - Hynan, Linda S.

AU - Miltenberger, Paula D.

AU - Labat, Dana Broussard

AU - Rifkin, Jamie B.

AU - Stringer, C. Allen

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Objective: Little is known about depression during pregnancy in women with high maternal or fetal risk, as this population is often excluded from research samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate depressive symptoms and known risk factors for depression in a group of women hospitalized with severe obstetric risk. Method: In the antenatal unit, 129 inpatients completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), and the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS) from October 2005 through December 2006. A subset of women were administered the Mood Disorders module of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders based on a score of ≥ 11 on the EPDS. Obstetric complications were classified according to the Hobel Risk Assessment for Prematurity. Results: Fifty-seven of the 129 women (44.2%) scored 11 or greater on the EPDS, and at least 25/129 (19.4%) met the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder. Mothers reporting high attachment to the fetus on the MAAS reported lower severity of depressive symptoms (rho = -0.33, p < .0001); those reporting interpersonal relationship dissatisfaction on the DAS endorsed higher depressive severity (rho = -0.21, p = .02). Severity of obstetric risk was unrelated to depression, but one complication, incompetent cervix, was positively associated with level of depressive symptomatology. Conclusion: Findings indicate a higher prevalence rate of major depressive disorder in women with severe obstetric risk than that reported in low-risk pregnancy samples, suggesting the need for routine depression screening to identify those who need treatment. Fewer depressive symptoms were reported by mothers reporting strong maternal fetal attachment and greater relationship satisfaction.

AB - Objective: Little is known about depression during pregnancy in women with high maternal or fetal risk, as this population is often excluded from research samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate depressive symptoms and known risk factors for depression in a group of women hospitalized with severe obstetric risk. Method: In the antenatal unit, 129 inpatients completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), and the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS) from October 2005 through December 2006. A subset of women were administered the Mood Disorders module of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders based on a score of ≥ 11 on the EPDS. Obstetric complications were classified according to the Hobel Risk Assessment for Prematurity. Results: Fifty-seven of the 129 women (44.2%) scored 11 or greater on the EPDS, and at least 25/129 (19.4%) met the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder. Mothers reporting high attachment to the fetus on the MAAS reported lower severity of depressive symptoms (rho = -0.33, p < .0001); those reporting interpersonal relationship dissatisfaction on the DAS endorsed higher depressive severity (rho = -0.21, p = .02). Severity of obstetric risk was unrelated to depression, but one complication, incompetent cervix, was positively associated with level of depressive symptomatology. Conclusion: Findings indicate a higher prevalence rate of major depressive disorder in women with severe obstetric risk than that reported in low-risk pregnancy samples, suggesting the need for routine depression screening to identify those who need treatment. Fewer depressive symptoms were reported by mothers reporting strong maternal fetal attachment and greater relationship satisfaction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44849129896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44849129896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 635

EP - 643

JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

SN - 0160-6689

IS - 4

ER -